This article is part of the highway renumbering series. | |
---|---|
Alabama | 1928, 1957 |
Arkansas | 1926 |
California | 1964 |
Colorado | 1953, 1968 |
Connecticut | 1932, 1963 |
Florida | 1945 |
Indiana | 1926 |
Iowa | 1926, 1969 |
Louisiana | 1955 |
Maine | 1933 |
Massachusetts | 1933 |
Minnesota | 1934 |
Missouri | 1926 |
Montana | 1932 |
Nebraska | 1926 |
Nevada | 1976 |
New Jersey | 1927, 1953 |
New Mexico | 1988 |
New York | 1927, 1930 |
North Carolina | 1934, 1937, 1940, 1961 |
Ohio | 1923, 1927, 1962 |
Pennsylvania | 1928, 1961 |
Puerto Rico | 1953 |
South Carolina | 1928, 1937 |
South Dakota | 1927, 1975 |
Tennessee | 1983 |
Texas | 1939 |
Utah | 1962, 1977 |
Virginia | 1923, 1928, 1933, 1940, 1958 |
Washington | 1964 |
Wisconsin | 1926 |
Wyoming | 1927 |
In 1963 and 1964, the California Division of Highways, at the behest of the California State Legislature, implemented a major renumbering of its state highways. The majority of sign routes—those marked for the public—kept their numbers; the main changes were to the legislative routes, which had their numbers changed to match the sign routes. Many formerly unsigned routes received sign numbers corresponding to their new legislative numbers. A smaller change was the removal and truncating of many U.S. Routes in favor of the Interstate Highways (designated in 1959), and the renumbering of State Routes that conflicted with Interstate numbers. Some U.S. Routes that were officially removed continued to be signed until the replacement Interstates were completed.
The state law authorizing the renumbering was passed by the Legislature on September 20, 1963. Signage changes took place by July 1, 1964.[1]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/1Views:2 214 867
-
The Cold War: Crash Course US History #37
Transcription
Hi I’m John Green; this is Crash Course U.S. history and today we’re gonna talk about the Cold War. The Cold War is called “Cold” because it supposedly never heated up into actual armed conflict, which means, you know, that it wasn’t a war. Mr. Green, Mr. Green, but if the War on Christmas is a war and the War on Drugs is a war… You’re not going to hear me say this often in your life, Me from the Past, but that was a good point. At least the Cold War was not an attempt to make war on a noun, which almost never works, because nouns are so resilient. And to be fair, the Cold War did involve quite a lot of actual war, from Korea to Afghanistan, as the world’s two superpowers, the United States and the U.S.S.R., sought ideological and strategic influence throughout the world. So perhaps it’s best to think of the Cold War as an era, lasting roughly from 1945 to 1990. Discussions of the Cold War tend to center on international and political history and those are very important, which is why we’ve talked about them in the past. This, however, is United States history, so let us heroically gaze--as Americans so often do--at our own navel. (Libertage.) Stan, why did you turn the globe to the Green Parts of Not-America? I mean, I guess to be fair, we were a little bit obsessed with this guy. So, the Cold War gave us great spy novels, independence movements, an arms race, cool movies like Dr. Strangelove and War Games, one of the most evil mustaches in history. But it also gave us a growing awareness that the greatest existential threat to human beings is ourselves. It changed the way we imagine the world and humanity’s role in it. In his Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, William Faulkner famously said, “Our tragedy today is a general and universal physical fear so long sustained by now that we can even bear it. There are no longer problems of the spirit. There is only the question: When will I be blown up?” So, today we’re gonna look at how that came to be the dominant question of human existence, and whether we can ever get past it. intro So after WWII the U.S. and the USSR were the only two nations with any power left. The United States was a lot stronger – we had atomic weapons, for starters, and also the Soviets had lost 20 million people in the war and they were led by a sociopathic mustachioed Joseph Stalin. But the U.S. still had worries: we needed a strong, free-market-oriented Europe (and to a lesser extent Asia) so that all the goods we were making could find happy homes. The Soviets, meanwhile, were concerned with something more immediate, a powerful Germany invading them. Again. Germany--and please do not take this personally, Germans--was very, very slow to learn the central lesson of world history: Do not invade Russia. Unless you’re the Mongols. (Mongoltage.) So at the end of World War II, the USSR “encouraged” the creation of pro-communist governments in Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland--which was a relatively easy thing to encourage, because those nations were occupied by Soviet troops. The idea for the Soviets was to create a communist buffer between them and Germany, but to the U.S. it looked like communism might just keep expanding, and that would be really bad for us, because who would buy all of our sweet, sweet industrial goods? So America responded with the policy of containment, as introduced in diplomat George F. Kennan’s famous Long Telegram. Communism could stay where it was, but it would not be allowed to spread. And ultimately this is why we fought very real wars in both Korea and Vietnam. As a government report from 1950 put it the goals of containment were: 1. Block further expansion of Soviet power 2. Expose the falsities of soviet pretensions 3. Induce a retraction of the Kremlin’s control and influence, and 4. In general, foster the seeds of destruction within the Soviet system. Harry Truman, who as you’ll recall, became President in 1945 after Franklin Delano Prez 4 Life Roosevelt died, was a big fan of containment, and the first real test of it came in Greece and Turkey in 1947. This was a very strategically valuable region because it was near the Middle East, and I don’t know if you’ve noticed this, but the United States has been just, like, a smidge interested in the Middle East the last several decades because of oil glorious oil. Right, so Truman announced the so-called Truman Doctrine, because you know why not name a doctrine after yourself, in which he pledged to support “freedom-loving peoples” against communist threats, which is all fine and good. But who will protect us against “peoples,” the pluralization of an already plural noun? Anyway, we eventually sent $400 million in aid to Greece and Turkey, and we were off to the Cold War races. The Truman Doctrine created the language through which Americans would view the world with America as free and communists as tyrannical. According to our old friend Eric Foner, “The speech set a precedent for American assistance to anticommunist regimes throughout the world, no matter how undemocratic, and for the creation of a set of global military alliances directed against the Soviet Union.”[1] It also led to the creation of a new security apparatus – the National Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Atomic Energy Commission, all of which were somewhat immune from government oversight and definitely not democratically elected. And the containment policy and the Truman Doctrine also laid the foundations for a military build-up – an arms race – which would become a key feature of the Cold War. But it wasn’t all about the military, at least at first. Like, the Marshall Plan was first introduced at Harvard’s Commencement address in June 1947 by, get this, George Marshall, in what turned out to be, like, the second most important commencement address in all of American history. Yes, yes, Stan, okay. It was a great speech, thank you for noticing. Alright, let’s go to the Thought Bubble. The Marshall Plan was a response to economic chaos in Europe brought on by a particularly harsh winter that strengthened support for communism in France and Italy. The plan sought to use US Aid to combat the economic instability that provided fertile fields for communism. As Marshall said “ our policy is not directed against any country or doctrine, but against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos.” [2] Basically it was a New Deal for Europe, and it worked; Western Europe was rebuilt so that by 1950 production levels in industry had eclipsed pre-war levels and Europe was on its way to becoming a U.S. style-capitalist-mass-consumer society. Which it still is, kind of. Japan, although not technically part of the Marshall Plan, was also rebuilt. General Douglas MacArthur was basically the dictator there, forcing Japan to adopt a new constitution, giving women the vote, and pledging that Japan would foreswear war, in exchange for which the United States effectively became Japan’s defense force. This allowed Japan to spend its money on other things, like industry, which worked out really well for them. Meanwhile Germany was experiencing the first Berlin crisis. At the end of the war, Germany was divided into East and West, and even though the capital, Berlin, was entirely in the east, it was also divided into east and west. This meant that West Berlin was dependent on shipments of goods from West Germany through East Germany. And then, in 1948, Stalin cut off the roads to West Berlin. So, the Americans responded with an 11-month-long airlift of supplies that eventually led to Stalin lifting the blockade in 1948 and building the Berlin Wall, which stood until 1991, when Kool Aid Guy--no, wait, wait, wait, wait, that wasn’t when the Berlin Wall was built. That was in 1961. I just wanted to give Thought Bubble the opportunity to make that joke. Thanks, Thought Bubble. So right, the Wall wasn’t built until 1961, but 1949 did see Germany officially split into two nations, and also the Soviets detonated their first atomic bomb, and NATO was established, AND the Chinese Revolution ended in communist victory. So, by the end of 1950, the contours of the Cold War had been established, West versus East, Capitalist Freedom versus Communist totalitarianism. At least from where I’m sitting. Although now apparently I’m going to change where I’m sitting because it’s time for the Mystery Document. The rules here are simple. I guess the author of the Mystery Document and about 55% of the time I get shocked by the shock pen. “We must organize and enlist the energies and resources of the free world in a positive program for peace which will frustrate the Kremlin design for world domination by creating a situation in the free world to which the Kremlin will be compelled to adjust. Without such a cooperative effort, led by the United States, we will have to make gradual withdrawals under pressure until we discover one day that we have sacrificed positions of vital interest. It is imperative that this trend be reversed by a much more rapid and concerted build-up of the actual strength of both the United States and the other nations of the free world.” I mean all I can say about it is that it sounds American and, like, it was written in, like, 1951 and it seems kind of like a policy paper or something really boring so I...I mean... Yeah, I’m just going to have to take the shock. AH! National Security Council report NSC-68? Are you kidding me, Stan? Not-not 64? Or 81? 68? This is ridiculous! I call injustice. Anyway, as the apparently wildly famous NSC-68 shows, the U.S. government cast the Cold War as a rather epic struggle between freedom and tyranny, and that led to remarkable political consensus--both democrats and republicans supported most aspects of cold war policy, especially the military build-up part. Now, of course, there were some critics, like Walter Lippmann who worried that casting foreign policy in such stark ideological terms would result in the U.S. getting on the wrong side of many conflicts, especially as former colonies sought to remove the bonds of empire and become independent nations. But yeah, no, nothing like that ever happened. Yeah, I mean, it’s not like that happened in Iran or Nicaragua or Argentina or Brazil or Guatemala or Stan are you really going to make me list all of them? Fine. Or Haiti or Paraguay or the Philippines or Chile or Iraq or Indonesia or Zaire or, I’m sorry, THERE WERE A LOT OF THEM, OKAY? But these interventions were viewed as necessary to prevent the spread of communism, which was genuinely terrifying to people and it’s important to understand that. Like, national security agencies pushed Hollywood to produce anticommunist movies like “The Red Menace,” which scared people. And the CIA funded magazines, news broadcasts, concerts, art exhibitions, that gave examples of American freedom. It even supported painters like Jackson Pollack and the Museum of Modern Art in New York because American expressionism was the vanguard of artistic freedom and the exact opposite of Soviet socialist realism. I mean, have you seen Soviet paintings? Look at the hearty ankles on these socialist comrade peasants. Also because the Soviets were atheists, at least in theory, Congress in 1954 added the words “under God” to the pledge of allegiance as a sign of America’s resistance to communism. The Cold War also shaped domestic policy--anti-communist sentiment, for instance, prevented Truman from extending the social policies of the New Deal. The program that he dubbed the Fair Deal would have increased the minimum wage, extended national health insurance and increased public housing, Social Security and aid to education. But the American Medical Association lobbied against Truman’s plan for national health insurance by calling it “socialized” medicine, and Congress was in no mood to pay money for socialized anything. That problem goes away. But the government did make some domestic investments as a result of the Cold War--in the name of national security the government spent money on education, research in science, technology like computers, and transportation infrastructure. In fact we largely have the Cold War to thank for our marvelous interstate highway system, although part of the reason Congress approved it was to set up speedy evacuation routes in the event of nuclear war. And, speaking of nuclear war, it’s worth noting that a big part of the reason the Soviets were able to develop nuclear weapons so quickly was thanks to espionage, like for instance by physicist and spy Klaus Fuchs. I think I’m pronouncing that right. Fuchs worked on the Manhattan Project and leaked information to the Soviets and then later helped the Chinese to build their first bomb. Julius Rosenberg also gave atomic secrets to the Soviets, and was eventually executed--as was his less-clearly-guilty wife, Ethel. And it’s important to remember all that when thinking about the United States’s obsessive fear that there were communists in our midst. This began in 1947 with Truman’s Loyalty Review System, which required government employees to prove their patriotism when accused of disloyalty. How do you prove your loyalty? Rat out your co-workers as communists. No seriously though, that program never found any communists. This all culminated of course with the Red Scare and the rise of Wisconsin senator Joseph McCarthy, an inveterate liar who became enormously powerful after announcing in February 1950 that he had a list of 205 communists who worked in the state department In fact, he had no such thing, and McCarthy never identified a single disloyal American, but the fear of communism continued. In 1951’s Dennis v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the notion that being a communist leader itself was a crime. In this climate of fear, any criticism of the government and its policies or the U.S. in general was seen as disloyalty. There was only one question--when will I be blown up--and it encouraged loyalty, because only the government could prevent the spread of communism and keep us from being blown up. We’ve talked a lot about different ways that Americans have imagined freedom this year, but this was a new definition of freedom--the government exists in part to keep us free from massive destruction. So, the Cold War changed America profoundly: The U.S. has remained a leader on the world stage and continued to build a large, powerful, and expensive national state. But it also changed the way we imagine what it means to be free, and what it means to be safe. Thanks for watching. I’ll see you next week. Crash Course is created by all of these nice people and it is possible because of you and your support through Subbable.com. Subbable is a crowdfunding website that allows you to support the stuff you love on a monthly basis. Our Subbable subscribers make this show possible. Thanks to them. If you value Crash Course, please check out our Subbable. There are great perks there. And thanks to all of you for watching. As we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be awesome...Wait, wait, wait Stan, is that music copyrighted? Alright. It’s not. Whew. That saved us a thousand dollars. ________________ [1] Foner. Give me Liberty ebook version p. 954 [2] ibid
Changes in sign routes
U.S. Routes
- U.S. Route 6 was truncated to Bishop. The part south of Bishop was replaced by U.S. Route 395, State Route 14, Interstate 5, State Route 11 (now renumbered Interstate 110), and State Route 1 to the old U.S. 6 terminus at the Los Alamitos Circle in Long Beach.
- U.S. Route 40 became Interstate 80.
- U.S. Route 40 Alternate became new State Route 113 and State Route 70.
- U.S. Route 40 Business became new State Route 123.
- U.S. Route 50 was truncated to Sacramento. West from Sacramento, it became new State Route 99, existing State Route 4, Interstate 5, Interstate 205, Interstate 580, and Interstate 80.
- U.S. Route 60 became Interstate 10 east of Beaumont and the new State Route 60 west from Beaumont to the East L.A. interchange.
- U.S. Route 66 was truncated to Pasadena, becoming State Route 159 (from U.S. Route 66 Alternate) and an extension of State Route 2. East of Pasadena, it was continued to be signed, but was officially State Route 248, Interstate 210, State Route 30 (extended from its pre-1964 route), State Route 66, Interstate 15 and Interstate 40.
- U.S. Route 66 Alternate became State Route 159.
- U.S. Route 70 became Interstate 10 and State Route 212 and was eliminated in California (it now terminates in Globe, Arizona).
- U.S. Route 80 became Interstate 8 and was deleted from California (its terminus is now in Dallas, Texas).
- U.S. Route 91 became existing State Route 19, new State Route 214, part of new State Route 91, and Interstate 15.
- U.S. Route 99 was eliminated, along with U.S. Route 99E and U.S. Route 99W. South of Sacramento, US 99 became an extended State Route 111, a new State Route 86, Interstate 10, Interstate 5, State Route 99, and a new State Route 204. US 99E became Interstate 80, an extended State Route 65, a new State Route 70, and State Route 99, while US 99W became Interstate 80, a new State Route 113, and Interstate 5. US 99 north of the merge also became Interstate 5.
- U.S. Route 101 was truncated to Los Angeles; the eliminated portion became part of Interstate 5 and a new State Route 72. Two parts became freeway; the old route became State Route 82 and State Route 254.
- U.S. Route 101 Bypass in the San Francisco Bay Area became a relocated U.S. Route 101.
- U.S. Route 101 Alternate in Southern California became part of an extended State Route 1.
- U.S. Route 101 from San Jose to San Francisco became a new State Route 82.
- U.S. Route 299 became the majority of the new State Route 299.
- U.S. Route 399 became an extension (and relocation) of State Route 33 and a new State Route 119.
- U.S. Route 466 became a relocation of State Route 41, a new State Route 46, a new State Route 58, and Interstate 15.
- U.S. Route 95, U.S. Route 97, U.S. Route 199 and U.S. Route 395 remained the same. (US 395 has since been truncated at Adelanto. and now part of Interstate 15 from Adelanto to its north junction with Interstate 215, Interstate 215 to its south junction with Interstate 15, Interstate 15 to State Route 163, and State Route 163 to Interstate 5 in San Diego.)
State Routes
All available numbers up to and including State Route 255 were assigned in 1964; State Route 256 and above were assigned starting in 1965.[2]
- State Route 1 was extended south along U.S. Route 101 Alternate. One section (Route 1 was split there and part was unbuilt) became State Route 208.
- State Route 2 was extended west along U.S. Route 66. The section east of State Route 138 was replaced by State Route 138.
- State Route 5 was replaced by State Route 35 because of Interstate 5.
- State Route 7 replaced State Route 15 because of Interstate 15. Former SR 7 became Interstate 405.
- State Route 8 was replaced by State Route 26 because of Interstate 8.
- State Route 9 was shortened and relocated along a formerly unsigned state route. The old route became part of State Route 85, State Route 237, part of State Route 17 (now Interstate 880), State Route 262, Interstate 680, and State Route 238.
- State Route 10 was replaced by State Route 42 several years before the 1964 renumbering, due to the closeness of Interstate 10.
- State Route 11 was relocated onto a freeway. The old route became State Route 159.
- State Route 12 was relocated along an unconstructed route. The old route to SR 1 became part of State Route 116
- State Route 14 replaced part of U.S. Route 6. Former SR 14 became part of State Route 91.
- State Route 15 was replaced by State Route 7 because of Interstate 15.
- State Route 18 replaced part of State Route 30 south of Big Bear Lake. The old route became part of State Route 38.
- State Route 24 was truncated and relocated along an unconstructed route; the old route was replaced by State Route 242, State Route 4, State Route 13, State Route 160, State Route 16, State Route 113, State Route 99, and State Route 70.
- State Route 26 replaced State Route 8 because of Interstate 8. Former SR 26 became part of Interstate 10 west of Downtown Los Angeles, and the remainder was deleted from the system.
- State Route 29 was rerouted along part of State Route 53 and along a formerly unsigned state route. The old route became part of State Route 175.
- State Route 30 was truncated, with one part being replaced by rerouted State Route 18.
- State Route 33 was extended south along U.S. Route 399. It was rerouted along a formerly unsigned route. The old route became State Route 207.
- State Route 35 replaced State Route 5 because of Interstate 5. Former SR 35 became Interstate 605.
- State Route 37 was rerouted over Former SR 48. The old route became State Route 121.
- State Route 38 had extended west over part of State Route 18.
- State Route 41 had been rerouted over part of U.S. Route 466. The old route became part of State Route 46.
- State Route 42 had replaced State Route 10 several years before the 1964 renumbering, due to the closeness of Interstate 10.
- State Route 46 replaced part of U.S. Route 466 and part of State Route 41.
- State Route 48 was reassigned to part of State Route 138 and a partially unconstructed route. Former SR 48 became part of rerouted State Route 37.
- State Route 53 was truncated. The deleted part became a rerouting of State Route 29.
- State Route 58 replaced part of U.S. Route 466 and part of State Route 178. The new number was the same as the old legislative number, possibly by coincidence.
- State Route 60 replaced part of U.S. Route 60, as well as a new alignment.
- State Route 65 was relocated and extended north to replace part of U.S. Route 99E. The old route was renumbered as State Route 69.
- State Route 66 replaced part of U.S. Route 66.
- State Route 69 replaced part of relocated State Route 65.
- State Route 70 replaced parts of truncated State Route 24 and former U.S. Route 40 Alternate.
- State Route 71 was rerouted onto a freeway. The old route became State Route 215.
- State Route 72 replaced part of relocated U.S. Route 101.
- State Route 79 was rerouted onto a previously unsigned state route. The old route became County Road R3.
- State Route 82 replaced part of relocated U.S. Route 101.
- State Route 85 replaced part of State Route 9.
- State Route 86 replaced part of U.S. Route 99.
- State Route 91 replaced State Route 14 and part of U.S. Route 91.
- State Route 99 replaced much of U.S. Route 99 and U.S. Route 99E, with a new alignment between Sacramento and Olivehurst.
- State Route 111 was extended south over part of U.S. Route 99.
- State Route 113 replaced parts of U.S. Route 99W, U.S. Route 40 Alternate, and State Route 24.
- State Route 116 replaced part of State Route 12.
- State Route 118 had sections replaced by I-210.
- State Route 119 replaced part of U.S. Route 399.
- State Route 123 replaced U.S. Route 40 Business.
- State Route 138 extended east over part of State Route 2 and was rerouted over an unconstructed route.
- State Route 150 was relocated along a previously unsigned route. The old route was renumbered as State Route 192.
- State Route 154 had one part renumbered as State Route 246.
- State Route 159 replaced part of State Route 11 and part of U.S. Route 66.
- State Route 178 was truncated. The deleted part was transferred to State Route 58.
- State Route 192 replaced part of State Route 150.
- State Route 204 replaced part of U.S. Route 99.
- State Route 207 replaced part of State Route 33.
- State Route 208 replaced part of State Route 1.
- State Route 212 replaced part of U.S. Route 60 and U.S. Route 70.
- State Route 214 replaced part of U.S. Route 91
- State Route 215 replaced part of State Route 71.
- State Route 237 replaced part of State Route 9.
- State Route 238 replaced part of State Route 9.
- State Route 246 replaced part of State Route 154.
- State Route 254 replaced part of relocated U.S. Route 101.
- State Route 299 replaced U.S. Route 299.
See also
References
- ^ "Route Renumbering: New Green Markers Will Replace Old Shields". California Highways and Public Works. 43 (3–4): 11–13. March–April 1964. ISSN 0008-1159. Retrieved March 8, 2012 – via Archive.org.
- ^ State Highway Routes, Selected Information - 1994 with 1995 Revisions (PDF)