To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

1932 United States presidential election in Texas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1932 United States presidential election in Texas

← 1928 November 8, 1932 1936 →
 
FDR in 1933.jpg
President Hoover portrait.jpg
Nominee Franklin D. Roosevelt Herbert Hoover
Party Democratic Republican
Home state New York California
Running mate John N. Garner Charles Curtis
Electoral vote 23 0
Popular vote 760,348 97,959
Percentage 88.06% 11.35%

Texas Presidential Election Results 1932.svg
County Results
Roosevelt
  60–70%
  70–80%
  80–90%
  90–100%


President before election

Herbert Hoover
Republican

Elected President

Franklin D. Roosevelt
Democratic

The 1932 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 8, 1932, as part of the 1932 United States presidential election, which was held throughout all contemporary 48 states. Voters chose 23 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Texas voted for the Democratic nominee, Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt of New York, over the Republican nominee, incumbent President Herbert Hoover of California. Roosevelt ran with Speaker of the House John Nance Garner, a Texas native while Hoover ran with incumbent Vice President Charles Curtis of Kansas.

Roosevelt defeated Hoover in the Lone Star State by a landslide margin of 76.71%. To date, this is the largest blowout victory by any major party presidential nominee in the state, and marks the only time following the GOP's creation that Gillespie County and Kendall County both failed to back their candidate.

With 88.06%, Texas would prove to be Roosevelt's fifth strongest state in popular vote percentage after South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana and Georgia.[1] As of the 2020 presidential election, this is the last election in which Kendall County voted for a Democratic presidential candidate.[2]

Results

1932 United States presidential election in Texas[3]
Party Candidate Votes Percentage Electoral votes
Democratic Franklin D. Roosevelt 760,348 88.06% 23
Republican Herbert Hoover 97,959 11.35% 0
Socialist Norman Thomas 4,450[a] 0.52% 0
Liberty William Hope Harvey 324[a] 0.04% 0
Communist William Z. Foster 207[a] 0.02% 0
Jacksonian Democrat No candidate 104[a] 0.01% 0
Write-ins Write-ins 34 0.00% 0
Totals 863,426 100.00% 23

Results by county

County Franklin D. Roosevelt
Democratic
Herbert Hoover
Republican
Norman Thomas[4]
Socialist
William Hope Harvey[4]
Liberty
William Z. Foster[4]
Communist
Margin Total votes cast[5]
# % # % # % # % # % # %
Anderson 4,354 94.10% 259 5.60% 14 0.30% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,095 88.50% 4,627
Andrews 186 96.37% 6 3.11% 0 0.00% 1 0.52% 0 0.00% 180 93.26% 193
Angelina 4,962 94.46% 287 5.46% 4 0.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,675 89.00% 5,253
Aransas 268 87.01% 39 12.66% 1 0.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 229 74.35% 308
Archer 1,555 94.01% 97 5.86% 2 0.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,458 88.15% 1,654
Armstrong 813 92.70% 63 7.18% 1 0.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 750 85.52% 877
Atascosa 2,101 91.07% 192 8.32% 14 0.61% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,909 82.75% 2,307
Austin 2,806 94.96% 142 4.81% 7 0.24% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,664 90.15% 2,955
Bailey 851 88.83% 104 10.86% 3 0.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 747 77.97% 958
Bandera 883 70.70% 359 28.74% 6 0.48% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 524 41.95% 1,249
Bastrop 3,077 94.42% 180 5.52% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 2,897 88.89% 3,259
Baylor 1,437 96.25% 55 3.68% 1 0.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,382 92.57% 1,493
Bee 2,180 80.03% 534 19.60% 8 0.29% 0 0.00% 2 0.07% 1,646 60.43% 2,724
Bell 7,607 91.06% 724 8.67% 23 0.28% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6,883 82.39% 8,354
Bexar 37,765 82.83% 7,466 16.37% 332 0.73% 18 0.04% 13 0.03% 30,299 66.45% 45,594
Blanco 1,233 90.20% 127 9.29% 7 0.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,106 80.91% 1,367
Borden 242 97.19% 7 2.81% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 235 94.38% 249
Bosque 3,214 92.12% 272 7.80% 3 0.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,942 84.32% 3,489
Bowie 5,269 90.39% 541 9.28% 19 0.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,728 81.11% 5,829
Brazoria 2,948 82.44% 617 17.25% 11 0.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,331 65.18% 3,576
Brazos 2,588 92.40% 195 6.96% 18 0.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,393 85.43% 2,801
Brewster 875 86.63% 130 12.87% 3 0.30% 2 0.20% 0 0.00% 745 73.76% 1,010
Briscoe 977 95.50% 42 4.11% 2 0.20% 2 0.20% 0 0.00% 935 91.40% 1,023
Brooks 608 87.23% 86 12.34% 3 0.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 522 74.89% 697
Brown 4,024 91.98% 330 7.54% 19 0.43% 1 0.02% 1 0.02% 3,694 84.43% 4,375
Burleson 2,423 95.21% 119 4.68% 2 0.08% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 2,304 90.53% 2,545
Burnet 1,904 92.88% 144 7.02% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 1 0.05% 1,760 85.85% 2,050
Caldwell 3,317 91.88% 291 8.06% 2 0.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,026 83.82% 3,610
Calhoun 834 88.35% 100 10.59% 10 1.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 734 77.75% 944
Callahan 2,133 93.23% 152 6.64% 3 0.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,981 86.58% 2,288
Cameron 7,146 79.53% 1,785 19.87% 51 0.57% 2 0.02% 1 0.01% 5,361 59.67% 8,985
Camp 1,416 94.97% 73 4.90% 2 0.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,343 90.07% 1,491
Carson 1,391 86.67% 212 13.21% 2 0.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,179 73.46% 1,605
Cass 3,135 93.33% 224 6.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,911 86.66% 3,359
Castro 949 92.77% 66 6.45% 8 0.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 883 86.31% 1,023
Chambers 843 89.78% 91 9.69% 5 0.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 752 80.09% 939
Cherokee 4,125 94.44% 233 5.33% 9 0.21% 1 0.02% 0 0.00% 3,892 89.10% 4,368
Childress 2,072 92.58% 153 6.84% 13 0.58% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,919 85.75% 2,238
Clay 2,365 93.74% 151 5.98% 7 0.28% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,214 87.75% 2,523
Cochran 345 88.92% 31 7.99% 12 3.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 314 80.93% 388
Coke 983 93.89% 57 5.44% 6 0.57% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 926 88.44% 1,047
Coleman 2,881 92.10% 235 7.51% 12 0.38% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,646 84.59% 3,128
Collin 6,059 90.46% 589 8.79% 50 0.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5,470 81.67% 6,698
Collingsworth 1,753 93.29% 115 6.12% 8 0.43% 2 0.11% 1 0.05% 1,638 87.17% 1,879
Colorado 2,715 88.47% 331 10.79% 22 0.72% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 2,384 77.68% 3,069
Comal 2,211 92.05% 176 7.33% 13 0.54% 1 0.04% 1 0.04% 2,035 84.72% 2,402
Comanche 3,134 93.86% 192 5.75% 13 0.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,942 88.11% 3,339
Concho 1,126 95.91% 44 3.75% 4 0.34% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,082 92.16% 1,174
Cooke 3,775 88.51% 470 11.02% 20 0.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,305 77.49% 4,265
Coryell 3,347 94.52% 191 5.39% 3 0.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,156 89.13% 3,541
Cottle 1,196 96.92% 38 3.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,158 93.84% 1,234
Crane 416 91.63% 37 8.15% 1 0.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 379 83.48% 454
Crockett 329 66.20% 168 33.80% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 161 32.39% 497
Crosby 1,590 93.64% 108 6.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,482 87.28% 1,698
Culberson 285 93.75% 18 5.92% 0 0.00% 1 0.33% 0 0.00% 267 87.83% 304
Dallam 1,935 84.13% 341 14.83% 21 0.91% 2 0.09% 1 0.04% 1,594 69.30% 2,300
Dallas 37,363 80.09% 8,919 19.12% 354 0.76% 9 0.02% 8 0.02% 28,444 60.97% 46,653
Dawson 1,659 91.51% 153 8.44% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,506 83.07% 1,813
Deaf Smith 1,307 86.84% 198 13.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,109 73.69% 1,505
Delta 2,013 95.81% 87 4.14% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,926 91.67% 2,101
Denton 5,115 90.10% 520 9.16% 39 0.69% 3 0.05% 0 0.00% 4,595 80.94% 5,677
De Witt 3,206 91.05% 309 8.78% 4 0.11% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% 2,897 82.28% 3,521
Dickens 1,491 95.45% 63 4.03% 7 0.45% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 1,428 91.42% 1,562
Dimmit 843 77.34% 241 22.11% 5 0.46% 1 0.09% 0 0.00% 602 55.23% 1,090
Donley 1,626 91.71% 141 7.95% 5 0.28% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 1,485 83.76% 1,773
Duval 1,566 98.12% 30 1.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,536 96.24% 1,596
Eastland 4,958 89.24% 598 10.76% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,360 78.47% 5,556
Ector 530 89.08% 37 6.22% 1 0.17% 19 3.19% 8 1.34% 493 82.86% 595
Edwards 575 71.52% 224 27.86% 4 0.50% 1 0.12% 0 0.00% 351 43.66% 804
Ellis 7,033 92.49% 527 6.93% 39 0.51% 0 0.00% 5 0.07% 6,506 85.56% 7,604
El Paso 11,336 78.77% 2,841 19.74% 214 1.49% 1 0.01% 0 0.00% 8,495 59.03% 14,392
Erath 3,319 91.46% 284 7.83% 20 0.55% 5 0.14% 1 0.03% 3,035 83.63% 3,629
Falls 3,896 95.40% 181 4.43% 7 0.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,715 90.96% 4,084
Fannin 5,338 91.80% 460 7.91% 16 0.28% 0 0.00% 1 0.02% 4,878 83.89% 5,815
Fayette 4,985 95.26% 245 4.68% 3 0.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,740 90.58% 5,233
Fisher 1,395 92.63% 105 6.97% 6 0.40% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,290 85.66% 1,506
Floyd 1,976 92.94% 145 6.82% 4 0.19% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,831 86.12% 2,126
Foard 882 93.04% 53 5.59% 13 1.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 829 87.45% 948
Fort Bend 3,109 95.22% 148 4.53% 8 0.25% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,961 90.69% 3,265
Franklin 1,305 95.81% 56 4.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.07% 1,249 91.70% 1,362
Freestone 2,481 93.41% 170 6.40% 5 0.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,311 87.01% 2,656
Frio 998 87.54% 142 12.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 856 75.09% 1,140
Gaines 510 90.75% 44 7.83% 8 1.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 466 82.92% 562
Galveston 10,491 83.38% 2,011 15.98% 71 0.56% 4 0.03% 5 0.04% 8,480 67.40% 12,582
Garza 812 89.82% 87 9.62% 5 0.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 725 80.20% 904
Gillespie 2,642 79.65% 662 19.96% 12 0.36% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 1,980 59.69% 3,317
Glasscock 212 83.46% 42 16.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 170 66.93% 254
Goliad 1,542 89.76% 170 9.90% 1 0.06% 4 0.23% 1 0.06% 1,372 79.86% 1,718
Gonzales 3,384 90.77% 337 9.04% 5 0.13% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% 3,047 81.73% 3,728
Gray 3,446 86.69% 505 12.70% 22 0.55% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% 2,941 73.99% 3,975
Grayson 9,631 87.62% 1,317 11.98% 42 0.38% 2 0.02% 0 0.00% 8,314 75.64% 10,992
Gregg 5,204 93.38% 341 6.12% 20 0.36% 0 0.00% 8 0.14% 4,863 87.26% 5,573
Grimes 2,065 92.89% 153 6.88% 4 0.18% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 1,912 86.01% 2,223
Guadalupe 3,751 84.27% 691 15.52% 9 0.20% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,060 68.75% 4,451
Hale 3,029 88.13% 369 10.74% 39 1.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,660 77.39% 3,437
Hall 2,114 95.31% 91 4.10% 13 0.59% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,023 91.21% 2,218
Hamilton 2,474 93.64% 164 6.21% 2 0.08% 1 0.04% 1 0.04% 2,310 87.43% 2,642
Hansford 803 89.12% 67 7.44% 30 3.33% 1 0.11% 0 0.00% 736 81.69% 901
Hardeman 1,985 92.97% 145 6.79% 5 0.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,840 86.18% 2,135
Hardin 2,783 94.53% 161 5.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,622 89.06% 2,944
Harris 46,886 83.77% 8,604 15.37% 426 0.76% 9 0.02% 45 0.08% 38,282 68.40% 55,970
Harrison 4,057 88.12% 528 11.47% 19 0.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,529 76.65% 4,604
Hartley 586 88.79% 74 11.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 512 77.58% 660
Haskell 2,330 93.20% 154 6.16% 16 0.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,176 87.04% 2,500
Hays 1,822 88.88% 220 10.73% 7 0.34% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,602 78.15% 2,050
Hemphill 918 87.26% 133 12.64% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 785 74.62% 1,052
Henderson 3,522 93.67% 219 5.82% 19 0.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,303 87.85% 3,760
Hidalgo 9,695 75.84% 2,969 23.22% 100 0.78% 14 0.11% 6 0.05% 6,726 52.61% 12,784
Hill 5,297 93.55% 360 6.36% 4 0.07% 1 0.02% 0 0.00% 4,937 87.20% 5,662
Hockley 1,513 93.22% 76 4.68% 34 2.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,437 88.54% 1,623
Hood 1,119 90.98% 106 8.62% 5 0.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,013 82.36% 1,230
Hopkins 4,891 94.81% 261 5.06% 7 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,630 89.75% 5,159
Houston 3,087 94.84% 165 5.07% 3 0.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,922 89.77% 3,255
Howard 2,733 94.40% 149 5.15% 13 0.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,584 89.26% 2,895
Hudspeth 341 91.42% 31 8.31% 0 0.00% 1 0.27% 0 0.00% 310 83.11% 373
Hunt 6,856 93.41% 465 6.34% 13 0.18% 0 0.00% 6 0.08% 6,391 87.07% 7,340
Hutchinson 1,976 78.79% 505 20.14% 26 1.04% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 1,471 58.65% 2,508
Irion 398 87.28% 47 10.31% 11 2.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 351 76.97% 456
Jack 1,429 87.45% 189 11.57% 14 0.86% 0 0.00% 2 0.12% 1,240 75.89% 1,634
Jackson 1,030 84.84% 182 14.99% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 848 69.85% 1,214
Jasper 1,990 95.49% 93 4.46% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,897 91.03% 2,084
Jeff Davis 252 83.44% 46 15.23% 4 1.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 206 68.21% 302
Jefferson 17,129 82.09% 3,584 17.18% 145 0.69% 1 0.00% 6 0.03% 13,545 64.92% 20,865
Jim Hogg 428 89.35% 51 10.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 377 78.71% 479
Jim Wells 1,449 89.39% 162 9.99% 8 0.49% 0 0.00% 2 0.12% 1,287 79.40% 1,621
Johnson 4,858 89.88% 530 9.81% 17 0.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,328 80.07% 5,405
Jones 2,934 92.03% 224 7.03% 14 0.44% 12 0.38% 4 0.13% 2,710 85.01% 3,188
Karnes 2,458 92.75% 186 7.02% 4 0.15% 2 0.08% 0 0.00% 2,272 85.74% 2,650
Kaufman 4,116 93.78% 268 6.11% 5 0.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,848 87.67% 4,389
Kendall 1,185 73.65% 416 25.85% 5 0.31% 2 0.12% 1 0.06% 769 47.79% 1,609
Kenedy 123 95.35% 5 3.88% 0 0.00% 1 0.78% 0 0.00% 118 91.47% 129
Kent 561 95.57% 23 3.92% 3 0.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 538 91.65% 587
Kerr 2,165 77.21% 623 22.22% 15 0.53% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 1,542 54.99% 2,804
Kimble 890 87.77% 121 11.93% 3 0.30% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 769 75.84% 1,014
King 224 98.25% 4 1.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 220 96.49% 228
Kinney 678 88.28% 89 11.59% 0 0.00% 1 0.13% 0 0.00% 589 76.69% 768
Kleberg 1,727 88.56% 198 10.15% 23 1.18% 2 0.10% 0 0.00% 1,529 78.41% 1,950
Knox 1,600 93.79% 102 5.98% 4 0.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,498 87.81% 1,706
Lamar 5,911 93.72% 375 5.95% 16 0.25% 5 0.08% 0 0.00% 5,536 87.78% 6,307
Lamb 2,978 90.57% 271 8.24% 39 1.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,707 82.33% 3,288
Lampasas 1,824 93.83% 120 6.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,704 87.65% 1,944
La Salle 810 89.50% 92 10.17% 3 0.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 718 79.34% 905
Lavaca 4,378 94.91% 224 4.86% 9 0.20% 2 0.04% 0 0.00% 4,154 90.05% 4,613
Lee 1,831 94.33% 110 5.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,721 88.67% 1,941
Leon 1,958 94.32% 108 5.20% 9 0.43% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 1,850 89.11% 2,076
Liberty 2,527 90.38% 247 8.83% 18 0.64% 0 0.00% 4 0.14% 2,280 81.55% 2,796
Limestone 4,416 95.28% 215 4.64% 3 0.06% 1 0.02% 0 0.00% 4,201 90.64% 4,635
Lipscomb 865 68.06% 349 27.46% 19 1.49% 0 0.00% 38 2.99% 516 40.60% 1,271
Live Oak 1,070 89.77% 114 9.56% 7 0.59% 0 0.00% 1 0.08% 956 80.20% 1,192
Llano 1,229 91.92% 108 8.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,121 83.84% 1,337
Loving 187 86.98% 27 12.56% 1 0.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 160 74.42% 215
Lubbock 5,330 89.53% 590 9.91% 29 0.49% 1 0.02% 3 0.05% 4,740 79.62% 5,953
Lynn 1,930 94.24% 110 5.37% 8 0.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,820 88.87% 2,048
McCulloch 2,006 88.10% 265 11.64% 6 0.26% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,741 76.46% 2,277
McLennan 11,972 90.80% 1,108 8.40% 100 0.76% 1 0.01% 4 0.03% 10,864 82.40% 13,185
McMullen 258 95.56% 12 4.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 246 91.11% 270
Madison 1,344 98.53% 20 1.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,324 97.07% 1,364
Marion 861 90.54% 84 8.83% 6 0.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 777 81.70% 951
Martin 694 93.28% 44 5.91% 2 0.27% 4 0.54% 0 0.00% 650 87.37% 744
Mason 828 72.57% 309 27.08% 4 0.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 519 45.49% 1,141
Matagorda 2,039 82.85% 408 16.58% 14 0.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,631 66.27% 2,461
Maverick 847 80.21% 199 18.84% 10 0.95% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 648 61.36% 1,056
Medina 2,516 82.87% 515 16.96% 3 0.10% 2 0.07% 0 0.00% 2,001 65.91% 3,036
Menard 901 85.57% 150 14.25% 2 0.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 751 71.32% 1,053
Midland 1,245 88.80% 136 9.70% 4 0.29% 15 1.07% 2 0.14% 1,109 79.10% 1,402
Milam 4,676 94.22% 264 5.32% 0.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,412 88.90% 4,963
Mills 1,434 91.51% 133 8.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,301 83.02% 1,567
Mitchell 1,490 90.85% 148 9.02% 2 0.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,342 81.83% 1,640
Montague 3,090 91.39% 262 7.75% 0.77% 3 0.09% 0 0.00% 2,828 83.64% 3,381
Montgomery 1,971 93.90% 126 6.00% 2 0.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,845 87.90% 2,099
Moore 549 90.44% 56 9.23% 2 0.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 493 81.22% 607
Morris 1,253 97.06% 38 2.94% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,215 94.11% 1,291
Motley 900 96.15% 34 3.63% 1 0.11% 1 0.11% 0 0.00% 866 92.52% 936
Nacogdoches 3,603 96.70% 117 3.14% 6 0.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,486 93.56% 3,726
Navarro 6,392 92.44% 512 7.40% 11 0.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5,880 85.03% 6,915
Newton 1,586 97.00% 46 2.81% 2 0.12% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 1,540 94.19% 1,635
Nolan 2,453 91.70% 219 8.19% 2 0.07% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,234 83.51% 2,675
Nueces 6,659 86.91% 967 12.62% 35 0.46% 1 0.01% 0 0.00% 5,692 74.29% 7,662
Ochiltree 1,097 84.97% 183 14.18% 11 0.85% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 914 70.80% 1,291
Oldham 432 87.63% 61 12.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 371 75.25% 493
Orange 2,830 91.94% 244 7.93% 4 0.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,586 84.02% 3,078
Palo Pinto 2,722 87.02% 392 12.53% 14 0.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,330 74.49% 3,128
Panola 2,630 97.08% 50 1.85% 29 1.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,580 95.24% 2,709
Parker 3,074 88.28% 372 10.68% 36 1.03% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,702 77.60% 3,482
Parmer 1,154 87.49% 148 11.22% 16 1.21% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 1,006 76.27% 1,319
Pecos 1,261 87.09% 180 12.43% 7 0.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,081 74.65% 1,448
Polk 2,117 94.98% 110 4.93% 2 0.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,007 90.04% 2,229
Potter 6,366 83.29% 1,233 16.13% 40 0.52% 3 0.04% 1 0.01% 5,133 67.16% 7,643
Presidio 863 88.33% 112 11.46% 1 0.10% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 751 76.87% 977
Rains 937 95.13% 41 4.16% 7 0.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 896 90.96% 985
Randall 1,394 85.10% 231 14.10% 10 0.61% 2 0.12% 1 0.06% 1,163 71.00% 1,638
Reagan 681 84.28% 124 15.35% 3 0.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 557 68.94% 808
Real 335 79.01% 89 20.99% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 246 58.02% 424
Red River 3,181 95.44% 145 4.35% 7 0.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,036 91.09% 3,333
Reeves 1,085 89.60% 122 10.07% 4 0.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 963 79.52% 1,211
Refugio 1,201 86.15% 172 12.34% 3 0.22% 18 1.29% 0 0.00% 1,029 73.82% 1,394
Roberts 451 91.85% 36 7.33% 3 0.61% 1 0.20% 0 0.00% 415 84.52% 491
Robertson 2,396 94.18% 148 5.82% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,248 88.36% 2,544
Rockwall 1,237 95.23% 62 4.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,175 90.45% 1,299
Runnels 2,975 92.39% 235 7.30% 10 0.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,740 85.09% 3,220
Rusk 5,074 91.16% 483 8.68% 9 0.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,591 82.48% 5,566
Sabine 1,789 96.76% 57 3.08% 3 0.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,732 93.67% 1,849
San Augustine 1,802 98.96% 19 1.04% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,783 97.91% 1,821
San Jacinto 828 97.64% 16 1.89% 4 0.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 812 95.75% 848
San Patricio 2,142 83.48% 407 15.86% 13 0.51% 4 0.16% 0 0.00% 1,735 67.61% 2,566
San Saba 1,904 93.89% 122 6.02% 2 0.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,782 87.87% 2,028
Schleicher 516 87.16% 76 12.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 440 74.32% 592
Scurry 1,604 93.75% 105 6.14% 2 0.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,499 87.61% 1,711
Shackelford 1,316 91.52% 117 8.14% 3 0.21% 1 0.07% 1 0.07% 1,199 83.38% 1,438
Shelby 3,594 96.25% 120 3.21% 20 0.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,474 93.04% 3,734
Sherman 515 84.56% 91 14.94% 3 0.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 424 69.62% 609
Smith 7,424 90.53% 750 9.15% 25 0.30% 0 0.00% 2 0.02% 6,674 81.38% 8,201
Somervell 561 89.90% 43 6.89% 20 3.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 518 83.01% 624
Starr 754 95.93% 32 4.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 722 91.86% 786
Stephens 2,684 90.40% 256 8.62% 23 0.77% 1 0.03% 5 0.17% 2,428 81.78% 2,969
Sterling 354 96.46% 13 3.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 341 92.92% 367
Stonewall 976 95.13% 50 4.87% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 926 90.25% 1,026
Sutton 372 76.70% 113 23.30% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 259 53.40% 485
Swisher 1,448 88.78% 166 10.18% 16 0.98% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 1,282 78.60% 1,631
Tarrant 27,836 83.06% 5,251 15.67% 423 1.26% 0 0.00% 3 0.01% 22,585 67.39% 33,513
Taylor 5,235 88.95% 639 10.86% 10 0.17% 0 0.00% 1 0.02% 4,596 78.10% 5,885
Terrell 479 78.14% 133 21.70% 1 0.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 346 56.44% 613
Terry 1,448 93.84% 87 5.64% 7 0.45% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 1,361 88.20% 1,543
Throckmorton 932 90.57% 95 9.23% 2 0.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 837 81.34% 1,029
Titus 2,523 96.96% 75 2.88% 3 0.12% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 2,448 94.08% 2,602
Tom Green 4,957 86.75% 739 12.93% 16 0.28% 0 0.00% 2 0.04% 4,218 73.82% 5,714
Travis 11,718 87.60% 1,532 11.45% 123 0.92% 1 0.01% 2 0.01% 10,186 76.15% 13,376
Trinity 1,514 95.70% 65 4.11% 3 0.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,449 91.59% 1,582
Tyler 1,450 96.99% 44 2.94% 1 0.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,406 94.05% 1,495
Upshur 2,900 95.39% 129 4.24% 0.23% 4 0.13% 0 0.00% 2,771 91.15% 3,040
Upton 1,012 91.17% 92 8.29% 5 0.45% 1 0.09% 0 0.00% 920 82.88% 1,110
Uvalde 1,759 80.47% 422 19.30% 4 0.18% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 1,337 61.16% 2,186
Val Verde 1,412 76.86% 421 22.92% 2 0.11% 0 0.00% 2 0.11% 991 53.95% 1,837
Van Zandt 4,203 94.92% 190 4.29% 35 0.79% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,013 90.63% 4,428
Victoria 2,777 93.44% 190 6.39% 0.10% 2 0.07% 0 0.00% 2,587 87.05% 2,972
Walker 1,811 95.17% 83 4.36% 8 0.42% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,728 90.80% 1,903
Waller 1,192 92.83% 89 6.93% 3 0.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,103 85.90% 1,284
Ward 678 89.80% 70 9.27% 3 0.40% 2 0.26% 2 0.26% 608 80.53% 755
Washington 3,443 97.12% 99 2.79% 2 0.06% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 3,344 94.33% 3,545
Webb 4,299 86.52% 657 13.22% 8 0.16% 5 0.10% 0 0.00% 3,642 73.29% 4,969
Wharton 3,357 88.53% 405 10.68% 28 0.74% 0 0.00% 2 0.05% 2,952 77.85% 3,792
Wheeler 2,263 92.56% 165 6.75% 16 0.65% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 2,098 85.81% 2,445
Wichita 8,889 85.36% 1,479 14.20% 42 0.40% 1 0.01% 2 0.02% 7,410 71.16% 10,413
Wilbarger 3,397 94.13% 199 5.51% 12 0.33% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 3,198 88.61% 3,609
Willacy 1,042 80.03% 259 19.89% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 783 60.14% 1,302
Williamson 6,783 94.03% 418 5.79% 13 0.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6,365 88.23% 7,214
Wilson 2,435 93.22% 174 6.66% 3 0.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,261 86.56% 2,612
Winkler 642 88.19% 78 10.71% 6 0.82% 2 0.27% 0 0.00% 564 77.47% 728
Wise 2,681 89.97% 286 9.60% 13 0.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,395 80.37% 2,980
Wood 3,308 94.08% 189 5.38% 18 0.51% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 3,119 88.71% 3,516
Yoakum 245 95.33% 11 4.28% 1 0.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 234 91.05% 257
Young 3,156 90.64% 320 9.19% 5 0.14% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 2,836 81.45% 3,482
Zapata 271 91.86% 24 8.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 247 83.73% 295
Zavala 783 82.16% 166 17.42% 4 0.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 617 64.74% 953
Totals 771,109 88.19% 98,218 11.23% 4,421[a] 0.51% 235[a] 0.03% 224[a] 0.03% 672,891 76.95% 874,398[b]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g There are significant differences between totals for minor parties given in Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas, America at the Polls and Géoelections.
  2. ^ This total includes 157 “Jacksonian” and 34 write-in votes not separated by county.[6]

References

  1. ^ "1932 Presidential Election Statistics". Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved 2018-03-05.
  2. ^ Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
  3. ^ "1932 Presidential General Election Results – Texas". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved 2013-02-07.
  4. ^ a b c Géoelections; 1932 Presidential Election Popular Vote (.xlsx file for €15 on request with full Thomas and Harvey data)
  5. ^ Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920–1964; pp. 431–435 ISBN 0405077114
  6. ^ Scammon; America at the Polls, p. 456
This page was last edited on 25 November 2020, at 03:18
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.