To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

1918 United States Senate election in Massachusetts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1918 United States Senate election in Massachusetts

← 1913 November 5, 1918 1924 →
 
Nominee David I. Walsh John W. Weeks Thomas W. Lawson
Party Democratic Republican Independent
Popular vote 207,478 188,287 21,985
Percentage 49.66% 45.06% 5.26%

County results
Walsh:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%
Weeks:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%

Senator before election

John W. Weeks
Republican

Elected Senator

David I. Walsh
Democratic

The United States Senate election of 1918 in Massachusetts was held on November 5. Incumbent Republican Senator John W. Weeks ran for a second term in office but was defeated by Democratic former Governor David I. Walsh.

Primaries were held September 24. Both Walsh and Weeks were unopposed after their respective opponents, former Boston mayor John F. Fitzgerald and Governor Samuel W. McCall, withdrew from the race.

Walsh became the first U.S. Senator from Massachusetts elected to a full term as a member of the modern Democratic Party. (A previous Democratic U.S. Senator, Robert Rantoul Jr., served only one month in 1851 after winning a special election.) This was the only senate seat that Democrats flipped during this cycle. This was the first time that this seat was won by a non-Republican since 1855.

Background

The election was held mid-way through President Woodrow Wilson's second term in office. Following the sinking of the passenger ship Lusitania and two years of debate, the United States entered World War I with a declaration of war on Germany on April 6, 1917, and spent much of 1917 and 1918 building up a sufficient fighting force to contribute to the Allied effort in Europe.

Senator John Wingate Weeks had been a leading conservative critic of the Wilson administration and a candidate for president in 1916, though his appeal was limited to New England.[1] He failed to win the Republican nomination when the national convention settled on Charles Evans Hughes, who lost narrowly to Wilson. Weeks kept up his criticism of Wilson as American war involvement grew, calling Secretary of War Newton Baker a "pacifist by nature" and publicly calling the president's management of materiel and domestic coal into question.[2]

Republican primary

Candidates

Withdrew

Campaign

Early in the campaign,[when?] progressives hoped that Governor Samuel W. McCall would seek a rematch of the 1913 race, when he lost a protracted battle for the Republican nomination to Weeks on the thirty-first ballot.[3] That election, which was decided by a caucus of the Republican state legislators, was held before the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the direct primary system in Massachusetts, both progressive reforms which ostensibly gave McCall a comparative advantage. Weeks's anemic showing in the presidential campaign also hinted that he could be vulnerable.[1]

McCall formally announced his intent to seek the Senate seat in August, criticizing Weeks as one of a class of Senators who represented capital over the interests of the people. His campaign also accused Weeks of vote buying for hosting dinners for various ethnic societies. McCall's campaign also argued that among the ethnic minorities, the Polish community of Massachusetts would support McCall.[a][4]

The governor's campaign was aggressive but surprisingly brief; he withdrew by the end of the month, shocking observers.[5] His decision was made upon determination that the conservative W. Murray Crane wing of the party remained loyal to Weeks and would ensure his re-nomination.[1]

Results

Senator Weeks was unopposed for re-nomination.

1918 Republican U.S. Senate primary[6]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican John W. Weeks (incumbent) 77,659 99.90%
Write-in All others 79 0.10%
Total votes 77,738 100.00%

Democratic primary

Candidates

Withdrew

Results

Walsh was unopposed for the Democratic nomination.

1918 Democratic U.S. Senate primary[8]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic David I. Walsh 46,356 99.98%
Write-in All others 10 0.02%
Total votes 46,366 100.00%

General election

Candidates

Campaign

Walsh formally accepted the Democratic nomination at the state convention in Worcester on October 23. He pledged to "endeavor with all the ability and strength which I possess to assist... President Wilson in the... solution of those great problems... when peace shall come." He promised "unwavering support to President Wilson and his world work" and vowed to leave "nothing undone to help lighten the burdens ... of him whom Providence has chosen to direct us in these momentous times."[9]

Days later, Weeks responded to the implicit criticism that he had obstructed the war effort: "I do not know of a man in the Senate who wants to do anything that might in any way interfere with the war's progress, but while conceding that government by dictation is necessary, I am not ready to abnegate my right to form my own judgments."[10]

Despite abandoning his challenge, Governor McCall refused to campaign for Weeks in the general election; in addition to dividing the Republican vote, McCall thereby deprived Weeks, considered a drab speaker, of his widely regarded oratory talent.[1]

Results

General election [11]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic David I. Walsh 207,478 49.66%
Republican John W. Weeks (incumbent) 188,287 45.06%
Independent Thomas W. Lawson 21,985 5.26%
Write-in All others 92 0.02%
Total votes 417,842 100.00%

Walsh defeated Weeks by nearly 20,000 votes, making him the only candidate to be elected on the Democratic Party ticket in the state.[1]

Walsh's victory was credited to his progressive record as governor, his ability as an orator, and his Catholicism, as well as the personal support of President Wilson in contrast to Weeks's strident opposition. Walsh was the lone gain for the Democratic Party in the 1918 Senate elections.[12] Observers also credited the result to the active campaign against Weeks by advocates of a federal amendment to guarantee women's suffrage.[13]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ At the time, as a result of World War I, Poland was a renewed state and the Polish–Soviet War was developing, heightening Polish concerns in politics.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Sobel, Robert (1998). Coolidge: An American Enigma. pp. 109–115. Retrieved October 6, 2022.
  2. ^ "WEEKS DECLARES SEC BAKER A PACIFIST". The Boston Globe. February 16, 1918. p. 11. Retrieved October 6, 2022.
  3. ^ "REPUBLICANS READY TO ELECT MR. WEEKS BAY STATE SENATOR". The Christian Science Monitor. January 14, 1913. p. 1.
  4. ^ "Lines for Campaign of Gov. McCall Forming". The Greenfield Recorder. August 10, 1918. p. 7. Retrieved October 6, 2022.
  5. ^ "A "BOLT FROM THE BLUE"". Fall River Evening News. August 29, 1918. p. 8. Retrieved October 6, 2022.
  6. ^ Office of the Secretary of Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1918). Number of assessed polls, registered voters and persons who voted in each voting precinct in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts at the state, city and town elections.
  7. ^ "David I. Walsh to Run for Senate". The Christian Science Monitor. July 30, 1918. p. 5.
  8. ^ Office of the Secretary of Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1918). Number of assessed polls, registered voters and persons who voted in each voting precinct in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts at the state, city and town elections.
  9. ^ Flannagan 1968, p. 483.
  10. ^ "Weeks and Coolidge Heard at Luncheon". October 25, 1918. p. 9. Retrieved October 6, 2022.
  11. ^ Office of the Secretary of State of Massachusetts (1918). Number of assessed polls, registered voters and persons who voted in each voting precinct in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts at the state, city and town elections.
  12. ^ Flannagan 1968, p. 484.
  13. ^ Ray 1919, p. 81.

Bibliography

This page was last edited on 4 January 2024, at 10:48
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.