To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

How to transfigure the Wikipedia

Would you like Wikipedia to always look as professional and up-to-date? We have created a browser extension. It will enhance any encyclopedic page you visit with the magic of the WIKI 2 technology.

Try it — you can delete it anytime.

Install in 5 seconds
4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
Great Wikipedia has got greater.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

1916 United States presidential election in Texas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main article: 1916 United States presidential election
1916 United States presidential election in Texas
← 1912 November 7, 1916 1920 →
 
Woodrow Wilson-H&E.jpg
Governor Charles Evans Hughes.jpg
Allan Louis Benson (1871–1940) circa 1915 (cropped).jpg
Nominee Woodrow Wilson Charles Evans Hughes Allan L. Benson
Party Democratic Republican Socialist
Home state New Jersey New York New York
Running mate Thomas R. Marshall Charles W. Fairbanks George Ross Kirkpatrick
Electoral vote 20 0 0
Popular vote 286,514 64,999 1,985
Percentage 76.92% 17.45% 5.09%
President before election

Woodrow Wilson
Democratic

Elected President

Woodrow Wilson
Democratic

Elections in Texas
Category Government

The 1916 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 7, 1916. All contemporary forty-eight states were part of the 1916 United States presidential election. State voters chose twenty electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Texas was overwhelmingly won by incumbent president Woodrow Wilson. Wilson defeated Charles Evans Hughes by a landslide margin of 59.47 percentage points.

With 76.92 percent of the popular vote, Texas would prove to be Wilson's fifth strongest in terms of popular vote percentage after South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana and Georgia.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    41 090
    131 823
    520
    5 293
    26 876
  • ✪ The American Presidential Election of 1932
  • ✪ The American Presidential Election of 2016
  • ✪ United States presidential election, 1960
  • ✪ Rare Photographs of American Troops Defending the US-Mexico Border (1910's)
  • ✪ The American Presidential Election of 1904

Transcription

Contents

Results

1916 United States presidential election in Texas[2]
Party Candidate Votes Percentage Electoral votes
Democratic Woodrow Wilson 286,514 76.92% 20
Republican Charles Evans Hughes 64,999 17.45% 0
Socialist Allan L. Benson 18,963 5.09% 0
Prohibition Frank Hanly 1,985 0.53% 0
Totals 372,461 100.00% 20

Results by county

County Thomas Woodrow Wilson
Democratic 		Charles Evans Hughes
Republican 		Allan Louis Benson
Socialist 		James Franklin Hanly
Prohibition 		Margin Total votes cast[3]
# % # % # % # % # %
Anderson 1,984 74.11% 501 18.71% 187 6.99% 5 0.19% 1,483 55.40% 2,677
Andrews 71 95.95% 0 0.00% 3 4.05% 0 0.00% 68[a] 91.89% 74
Angelina 1,344 76.54% 75 4.27% 335 19.08% 2 0.11% 1,009[a] 57.46% 1,756
Aransas 179 84.83% 24 11.37% 6 2.84% 2 0.95% 155 73.46% 211
Archer 527 78.54% 104 15.50% 34 5.07% 6 0.89% 423 63.04% 671
Armstrong 353 86.73% 43 10.57% 6 1.47% 5 1.23% 310 76.17% 407
Atascosa 635 78.40% 119 14.69% 44 5.43% 12 1.48% 516 63.70% 810
Austin 960 58.43% 673 40.96% 10 0.61% 0 0.00% 287 17.47% 1,643
Bandera 537 71.41% 168 22.34% 44 5.85% 3 0.40% 369 49.07% 752
Bastrop 1,335 69.93% 550 28.81% 21 1.10% 3 0.16% 785 41.12% 1,909
Baylor 711 85.05% 47 5.62% 74 8.85% 4 0.48% 637[a] 76.20% 836
Bee 584 76.14% 152 19.82% 29 3.78% 2 0.26% 432 56.32% 767
Bell 3,615 86.75% 356 8.54% 162 3.89% 34 0.82% 3,259 78.21% 4,167
Bexar 7,008 55.12% 5,483 43.13% 187 1.47% 36 0.28% 1,525 11.99% 12,714
Blanco 628 70.96% 235 26.55% 19 2.15% 3 0.34% 393 44.41% 885
Borden 84 92.31% 1 1.10% 3 3.30% 3 3.30% 81[a] 89.01% 91
Bosque 1,561 85.91% 179 9.85% 73 4.02% 4 0.22% 1,382 76.06% 1,817
Bowie 1,941 73.69% 414 15.72% 273 10.36% 6 0.23% 1,527 57.97% 2,634
Brazoria 1,033 59.78% 581 33.62% 80 4.63% 34 1.97% 452 26.16% 1,728
Brazos 1,027 78.52% 273 20.87% 3 0.23% 5 0.38% 754 57.65% 1,308
Brewster 207 80.23% 43 16.67% 7 2.71% 1 0.39% 164 63.57% 258
Briscoe 260 90.91% 4 1.40% 22 7.69% 0 0.00% 238[a] 83.22% 286
Brooks 101 60.48% 63 37.72% 1 0.60% 2 1.20% 38 22.75% 167
Brown 1,986 87.22% 181 7.95% 104 4.57% 6 0.26% 1,805 79.27% 2,277
Burleson 1,208 80.80% 262 17.53% 23 1.54% 2 0.13% 946 63.28% 1,495
Burnet 913 86.29% 115 10.87% 23 2.17% 7 0.66% 798 75.43% 1,058
Caldwell 1,216 83.40% 225 15.43% 15 1.03% 2 0.14% 991 67.97% 1,458
Calhoun 388 71.32% 84 15.44% 64 11.76% 8 1.47% 304 55.88% 544
Callahan 959 85.55% 74 6.60% 83 7.40% 5 0.45% 876[a] 78.14% 1,121
Cameron 1,260 73.43% 420 24.48% 25 1.46% 11 0.64% 840 48.95% 1,716
Camp 721 74.79% 206 21.37% 35 3.63% 2 0.21% 515 53.42% 964
Carson 326 78.74% 78 18.84% 7 1.69% 3 0.72% 248 59.90% 414
Cass 1,505 64.43% 707 30.27% 124 5.31% 0 0.00% 798 34.16% 2,336
Castro 176 69.84% 69 27.38% 5 1.98% 2 0.79% 107 42.46% 252
Chambers 239 61.92% 101 26.17% 43 11.14% 3 0.78% 138 35.75% 386
Cherokee 2,002 80.34% 241 9.67% 245 9.83% 4 0.16% 1,757[a] 70.51% 2,492
Childress 948 89.52% 31 2.93% 77 7.27% 3 0.28% 871[a] 82.25% 1,059
Clay 1,324 84.87% 177 11.35% 54 3.46% 5 0.32% 1,147 73.53% 1,560
Coke 484 86.74% 29 5.20% 42 7.53% 3 0.54% 442[a] 79.21% 558
Coleman 1,700 85.86% 96 4.85% 182 9.19% 2 0.10% 1,518[a] 76.67% 1,980
Collin 4,141 83.94% 594 12.04% 190 3.85% 8 0.16% 3,547 71.90% 4,933
Collingsworth 589 86.62% 31 4.56% 54 7.94% 6 0.88% 535[a] 78.68% 680
Colorado 1,041 70.29% 358 24.17% 76 5.13% 6 0.41% 683 46.12% 1,481
Comal 432 35.61% 743 61.25% 38 3.13% 0 0.00% -311 -25.64% 1,213
Comanche 1,494 76.38% 148 7.57% 301 15.39% 13 0.66% 1,193[a] 60.99% 1,956
Concho 418 82.12% 36 7.07% 53 10.41% 2 0.39% 365[a] 71.71% 509
Cooke 2,273 83.11% 353 12.91% 106 3.88% 3 0.11% 1,920 70.20% 2,735
Coryell 1,802 87.26% 188 9.10% 72 3.49% 3 0.15% 1,614 78.16% 2,065
Cottle 455 85.05% 12 2.24% 67 12.52% 1 0.19% 388[a] 72.52% 535
Crockett 65 75.58% 16 18.60% 5 5.81% 0 0.00% 49 56.98% 86
Crosby 456 85.55% 31 5.82% 46 8.63% 0 0.00% 410[a] 76.92% 533
Culberson 124 97.64% 2 1.57% 1 0.79% 0 0.00% 122 96.06% 127
Dallam 363 74.08% 81 16.53% 39 7.96% 7 1.43% 282 57.55% 490
Dallas 13,410 82.51% 2,554 15.71% 184 1.13% 105 0.65% 10,856 66.79% 16,253
Dawson 288 90.57% 14 4.40% 14 4.40% 2 0.63% 274 86.16% 318
Deaf Smith 356 78.76% 77 17.04% 16 3.54% 3 0.66% 279 61.73% 452
Delta 1,254 86.48% 72 4.97% 115 7.93% 9 0.62% 1,139[a] 78.55% 1,450
Denton 2,844 82.15% 451 13.03% 157 4.53% 10 0.29% 2,393 69.12% 3,462
De Witt 1,056 49.18% 1,068 49.74% 21 0.98% 2 0.09% -12 -0.56% 2,147
Dickens 389 87.81% 15 3.39% 39 8.80% 0 0.00% 350[a] 79.01% 443
Dimmit 193 72.01% 74 27.61% 0 0.00% 1 0.37% 119 44.40% 268
Donley 636 85.14% 42 5.62% 54 7.23% 15 2.01% 582[a] 77.91% 747
Duval 597 93.72% 37 5.81% 3 0.47% 0 0.00% 560 87.91% 637
Eastland 1,486 76.64% 146 7.53% 294 15.16% 13 0.67% 1,192[a] 61.47% 1,939
Ector 120 98.36% 2 1.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 118 96.72% 122
Edwards 299 79.10% 73 19.31% 5 1.32% 1 0.26% 226 59.79% 378
Ellis 3,603 65.30% 1,770 32.08% 111 2.01% 34 0.62% 1,833 33.22% 5,518
El Paso 4,718 92.02% 324 6.32% 74 1.44% 11 0.21% 4,394 85.70% 5,127
Erath 2,024 80.57% 184 7.32% 287 11.43% 17 0.68% 1,737[a] 69.15% 2,512
Falls 2,037 67.56% 729 24.18% 232 7.69% 17 0.56% 1,308 43.38% 3,015
Fannin 3,493 82.99% 471 11.19% 236 5.61% 9 0.21% 3,022 71.80% 4,209
Fayette 1,902 60.19% 1,212 38.35% 40 1.27% 6 0.19% 690 21.84% 3,160
Fisher 950 77.17% 46 3.74% 229 18.60% 6 0.49% 721[a] 58.57% 1,231
Floyd 600 81.86% 48 6.55% 78 10.64% 7 0.95% 522[a] 71.21% 733
Foard 475 78.64% 41 6.79% 88 14.57% 0 0.00% 387[a] 64.07% 604
Fort Bend 788 69.12% 329 28.86% 16 1.40% 7 0.61% 459 40.26% 1,140
Franklin 684 86.80% 62 7.87% 42 5.33% 0 0.00% 622 78.93% 788
Freestone 1,575 68.15% 637 27.56% 98 4.24% 1 0.04% 938 40.59% 2,311
Frio 410 87.05% 55 11.68% 4 0.85% 2 0.42% 355 75.37% 471
Gaines 80 95.24% 0 0.00% 4 4.76% 0 0.00% 76[a] 90.48% 84
Galveston 3,543 71.94% 1,263 25.64% 73 1.48% 46 0.93% 2,280 46.29% 4,925
Garza 330 92.18% 14 3.91% 14 3.91% 0 0.00% 316 88.27% 358
Gillespie 405 21.52% 1,463 77.74% 12 0.64% 2 0.11% -1,058 -56.22% 1,882
Glasscock 96 88.89% 8 7.41% 4 3.70% 0 0.00% 88 81.48% 108
Goliad 605 49.71% 548 45.03% 59 4.85% 5 0.41% 57 4.68% 1,217
Gonzales 1,675 70.35% 649 27.26% 51 2.14% 6 0.25% 1,026 43.09% 2,381
Gray 482 81.97% 69 11.73% 35 5.95% 2 0.34% 413 70.24% 588
Grayson 5,092 79.30% 1,024 15.95% 285 4.44% 20 0.31% 4,068 63.35% 6,421
Gregg 820 81.51% 159 15.81% 25 2.49% 2 0.20% 661 65.71% 1,006
Grimes 1,108 89.14% 108 8.69% 25 2.01% 2 0.16% 1,000 80.45% 1,243
Guadalupe 830 31.32% 1,812 68.38% 7 0.26% 1 0.04% -982 -37.06% 2,650
Hale 908 87.48% 80 7.71% 43 4.14% 7 0.67% 828 79.77% 1,038
Hall 925 86.61% 49 4.59% 88 8.24% 6 0.56% 837[a] 78.37% 1,068
Hamilton 1,231 84.26% 201 13.76% 28 1.92% 1 0.07% 1,030 70.50% 1,461
Hansford 166 70.34% 47 19.92% 14 5.93% 9 3.81% 119 50.42% 236
Hardeman 932 80.69% 94 8.14% 123 10.65% 6 0.52% 809[a] 70.04% 1,155
Hardin 1,279 83.38% 158 10.30% 90 5.87% 7 0.46% 1,121 73.08% 1,534
Harris 10,131 74.24% 3,009 22.05% 433 3.17% 74 0.54% 7,122 52.19% 13,647
Harrison 1,374 85.02% 172 10.64% 60 3.71% 10 0.62% 1,202 74.38% 1,616
Hartley 161 83.42% 30 15.54% 1 0.52% 1 0.52% 131 67.88% 193
Haskell 1,200 72.03% 95 5.70% 369 22.15% 2 0.12% 831 49.88% 1,666
Hays 995 87.82% 123 10.86% 10 0.88% 5 0.44% 872 76.96% 1,133
Hemphill 496 73.48% 141 20.89% 25 3.70% 13 1.93% 355 52.59% 675
Henderson 1,790 74.18% 268 11.11% 354 14.67% 1 0.04% 1,436[a] 59.51% 2,413
Hidalgo 1,364 82.32% 260 15.69% 26 1.57% 7 0.42% 1,104 66.63% 1,657
Hill 3,951 89.07% 382 8.61% 86 1.94% 17 0.38% 3,569 80.46% 4,436
Hood 693 82.30% 64 7.60% 84 9.98% 1 0.12% 609[a] 72.33% 842
Hopkins 2,568 84.72% 218 7.19% 231 7.62% 14 0.46% 2,337[a] 77.10% 3,031
Houston 1,730 76.38% 373 16.47% 162 7.15% 0 0.00% 1,357 59.91% 2,265
Howard 747 85.18% 30 3.42% 99 11.29% 1 0.11% 648[a] 73.89% 877
Hunt 4,242 87.68% 424 8.76% 155 3.20% 17 0.35% 3,818 78.92% 4,838
Hutchinson 114 75.50% 28 18.54% 6 3.97% 3 1.99% 86 56.95% 151
Irion 150 90.36% 5 3.01% 11 6.63% 0 0.00% 139[a] 83.73% 166
Jack 862 78.22% 121 10.98% 115 10.44% 4 0.36% 741 67.24% 1,102
Jackson 403 67.85% 123 20.71% 63 10.61% 5 0.84% 280 47.14% 594
Jasper 906 88.30% 75 7.31% 41 4.00% 4 0.39% 831 80.99% 1,026
Jeff Davis 234 75.24% 74 23.79% 1 0.32% 2 0.64% 160 51.45% 311
Jefferson 3,082 82.06% 488 12.99% 155 4.13% 31 0.83% 2,594 69.06% 3,756
Jim Hogg 187 94.44% 11 5.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 176 88.89% 198
Jim Wells 335 70.68% 100 21.10% 35 7.38% 4 0.84% 235 49.58% 474
Johnson 3,040 86.93% 275 7.86% 170 4.86% 12 0.34% 2,765 79.07% 3,497
Jones 1,798 84.18% 114 5.34% 214 10.02% 10 0.47% 1,584[a] 74.16% 2,136
Karnes 889 78.26% 238 20.95% 5 0.44% 4 0.35% 651 57.31% 1,136
Kaufman 2,780 82.25% 427 12.63% 172 5.09% 1 0.03% 2,353 69.62% 3,380
Kendall 232 27.92% 590 71.00% 5 0.60% 4 0.48% -358 -43.08% 831
Kent 212 88.70% 2 0.84% 25 10.46% 0 0.00% 187[a] 78.24% 239
Kerr 621 66.99% 272 29.34% 30 3.24% 4 0.43% 349 37.65% 927
Kimble 223 89.56% 13 5.22% 13 5.22% 0 0.00% 210 84.34% 249
King 47 94.00% 3 6.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 44 88.00% 50
Kinney 233 52.71% 201 45.48% 7 1.58% 1 0.23% 32 7.24% 442
Kleberg 427 73.88% 106 18.34% 44 7.61% 1 0.17% 321 55.54% 578
Knox 884 83.79% 64 6.07% 105 9.95% 2 0.19% 779[a] 73.84% 1,055
Lamar 3,412 89.23% 309 8.08% 96 2.51% 7 0.18% 3,103 81.15% 3,824
Lamb 150 87.21% 14 8.14% 4 2.33% 4 2.33% 136 79.07% 172
Lampasas 848 85.23% 113 11.36% 31 3.12% 3 0.30% 735 73.87% 995
La Salle 340 88.54% 40 10.42% 3 0.78% 1 0.26% 300 78.13% 384
Lavaca 1,784 60.13% 936 31.55% 241 8.12% 6 0.20% 848 28.58% 2,967
Lee 571 38.32% 836 56.11% 82 5.50% 1 0.07% -265 -17.79% 1,490
Leon 979 66.33% 335 22.70% 162 10.98% 0 0.00% 644 43.63% 1,476
Liberty 704 68.68% 235 22.93% 82 8.00% 4 0.39% 469 45.76% 1,025
Limestone 2,188 86.62% 225 8.91% 107 4.24% 6 0.24% 1,963 77.71% 2,526
Lipscomb 350 66.92% 116 22.18% 47 8.99% 10 1.91% 234 44.74% 523
Live Oak 397 69.16% 119 20.73% 51 8.89% 7 1.22% 278 48.43% 574
Llano 716 88.07% 72 8.86% 23 2.83% 2 0.25% 644 79.21% 813
Lubbock 633 90.69% 34 4.87% 27 3.87% 4 0.57% 599 85.82% 698
Lynn 331 93.50% 15 4.24% 8 2.26% 0 0.00% 316 89.27% 354
McCulloch 847 82.63% 61 5.95% 117 11.41% 0 0.00% 730[a] 71.22% 1,025
McLennan 4,979 82.26% 940 15.53% 122 2.02% 12 0.20% 4,039 66.73% 6,053
McMullen 115 79.86% 29 20.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 86 59.72% 144
Madison 730 81.38% 120 13.38% 41 4.57% 6 0.67% 610 68.00% 897
Marion 445 72.48% 166 27.04% 1 0.16% 2 0.33% 279 45.44% 614
Martin 125 77.64% 14 8.70% 22 13.66% 0 0.00% 103[a] 63.98% 161
Mason 386 67.13% 157 27.30% 32 5.57% 0 0.00% 229 39.83% 575
Matagorda 748 68.56% 252 23.10% 79 7.24% 12 1.10% 496 45.46% 1,091
Maverick 192 43.54% 246 55.78% 2 0.45% 1 0.23% -54 -12.24% 441
Medina 758 52.60% 650 45.11% 26 1.80% 7 0.49% 108 7.49% 1,441
Menard 267 77.84% 44 12.83% 32 9.33% 0 0.00% 223 65.01% 343
Midland 339 91.37% 24 6.47% 7 1.89% 1 0.27% 315 84.91% 371
Milam 2,198 73.07% 576 19.15% 230 7.65% 4 0.13% 1,622 53.92% 3,008
Mills 640 72.89% 129 14.69% 106 12.07% 3 0.34% 511 58.20% 878
Mitchell 803 87.00% 39 4.23% 80 8.67% 1 0.11% 723[a] 78.33% 923
Montague 1,803 78.56% 245 10.68% 242 10.54% 5 0.22% 1,558 67.89% 2,295
Montgomery 880 72.07% 197 16.13% 141 11.55% 3 0.25% 683 55.94% 1,221
Moore 103 94.50% 6 5.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 97 88.99% 109
Morris 689 64.57% 163 15.28% 52 4.87% 163 15.28% 526 49.30% 1,067
Motley 393 91.40% 9 2.09% 28 6.51% 0 0.00% 365[a] 84.88% 430
Nacogdoches 1,766 88.21% 92 4.60% 141 7.04% 3 0.15% 1,625[a] 81.17% 2,002
Navarro 3,527 89.81% 294 7.49% 100 2.55% 6 0.15% 3,233 82.33% 3,927
Newton 493 88.35% 34 6.09% 23 4.12% 8 1.43% 459 82.26% 558
Nolan 1,048 85.97% 91 7.47% 79 6.48% 1 0.08% 957 78.51% 1,219
Nueces 1,830 76.35% 404 16.85% 142 5.92% 21 0.88% 1,426 59.49% 2,397
Ochiltree 238 82.93% 41 14.29% 8 2.79% 0 0.00% 197 68.64% 287
Oldham 138 75.00% 42 22.83% 0 0.00% 4 2.17% 96 52.17% 184
Orange 758 85.84% 92 10.42% 0 0.00% 33 3.74% 666 75.42% 883
Palo Pinto 1,431 77.44% 124 6.71% 282 15.26% 11 0.60% 1,149[a] 62.18% 1,848
Panola 1,228 86.12% 125 8.77% 71 4.98% 2 0.14% 1,103 77.35% 1,426
Parker 1,797 80.69% 173 7.77% 240 10.78% 17 0.76% 1,557[a] 69.91% 2,227
Parmer 194 70.80% 64 23.36% 10 3.65% 6 2.19% 130 47.45% 274
Pecos 394 79.44% 96 19.35% 2 0.40% 4 0.81% 298 60.08% 496
Polk 918 80.60% 107 9.39% 113 9.92% 1 0.09% 805[a] 70.68% 1,139
Potter 1,288 82.62% 166 10.65% 99 6.35% 6 0.38% 1,122 71.97% 1,559
Presidio 245 89.74% 27 9.89% 0 0.00% 1 0.37% 218 79.85% 273
Rains 509 58.57% 71 8.17% 289 33.26% 0 0.00% 220[a] 25.32% 869
Randall 341 80.81% 63 14.93% 6 1.42% 12 2.84% 278 65.88% 422
Reagan 59 95.16% 2 3.23% 0 0.00% 1 1.61% 57 91.94% 62
Real 242 85.21% 14 4.93% 25 8.80% 3 1.06% 217[a] 76.41% 284
Red River 2,021 80.10% 356 14.11% 141 5.59% 5 0.20% 1,665 65.99% 2,523
Reeves 346 87.59% 43 10.89% 5 1.27% 1 0.25% 303 76.71% 395
Refugio 408 58.62% 232 33.33% 47 6.75% 9 1.29% 176 25.29% 696
Roberts 220 87.65% 27 10.76% 3 1.20% 1 0.40% 193 76.89% 251
Robertson 1,313 83.26% 218 13.82% 44 2.79% 2 0.13% 1,095 69.44% 1,577
Rockwall 828 94.95% 27 3.10% 0 0.00% 17 1.95% 801 91.86% 872
Runnels 1,487 81.66% 195 10.71% 133 7.30% 6 0.33% 1,292 70.95% 1,821
Rusk 1,849 72.00% 521 20.29% 196 7.63% 2 0.08% 1,328 51.71% 2,568
Sabine 681 89.72% 22 2.90% 54 7.11% 2 0.26% 627[a] 82.61% 759
San Augustine 682 90.69% 18 2.39% 51 6.78% 1 0.13% 631[a] 83.91% 752
San Jacinto 442 63.23% 255 36.48% 1 0.14% 1 0.14% 187 26.75% 699
San Patricio 594 74.53% 130 16.31% 65 8.16% 8 1.00% 464 58.22% 797
San Saba 935 85.31% 66 6.02% 90 8.21% 5 0.46% 845[a] 77.10% 1,096
Schleicher 163 92.09% 10 5.65% 1 0.56% 3 1.69% 153 86.44% 177
Scurry 994 89.15% 40 3.59% 78 7.00% 3 0.27% 916[a] 82.15% 1,115
Shackelford 378 80.94% 51 10.92% 36 7.71% 2 0.43% 327 70.02% 467
Shelby 1,767 84.99% 131 6.30% 175 8.42% 6 0.29% 1,592[a] 76.58% 2,079
Sherman 152 75.25% 39 19.31% 9 4.46% 2 0.99% 113 55.94% 202
Smith 2,422 69.58% 773 22.21% 270 7.76% 16 0.46% 1,649 47.37% 3,481
Somervell 278 72.77% 20 5.24% 84 21.99% 0 0.00% 194[a] 50.79% 382
Starr 516 81.77% 115 18.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 401 63.55% 631
Stephens 572 83.26% 12 1.75% 103 14.99% 0 0.00% 469[a] 68.27% 687
Sterling 205 96.70% 6 2.83% 0 0.00% 1 0.47% 199 93.87% 212
Stonewall 502 78.19% 21 3.27% 119 18.54% 0 0.00% 383[a] 59.66% 642
Sutton 130 90.91% 13 9.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 117 81.82% 143
Swisher 381 83.55% 62 13.60% 11 2.41% 2 0.44% 319 69.96% 456
Tarrant 10,269 84.08% 1,550 12.69% 329 2.69% 65 0.53% 8,719 71.39% 12,213
Taylor 2,134 89.89% 120 5.05% 118 4.97% 2 0.08% 2,014 84.84% 2,374
Terrell 181 74.79% 59 24.38% 2 0.83% 0 0.00% 122 50.41% 242
Terry 146 99.32% 1 0.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 145 98.64% 147
Throckmorton 333 79.29% 10 2.38% 76 18.10% 1 0.24% 257[a] 61.19% 420
Titus 1,164 79.18% 189 12.86% 95 6.46% 22 1.50% 975 66.33% 1,470
Tom Green 1,243 88.16% 92 6.52% 63 4.47% 12 0.85% 1,151 81.63% 1,410
Travis 3,682 82.54% 690 15.47% 71 1.59% 18 0.40% 2,992 67.07% 4,461
Trinity 906 78.44% 156 13.51% 91 7.88% 2 0.17% 750 64.94% 1,155
Tyler 635 92.03% 24 3.48% 31 4.49% 0 0.00% 604[a] 87.54% 690
Upshur 1,346 80.36% 198 11.82% 121 7.22% 10 0.60% 1,148 68.54% 1,675
Upton 42 85.71% 6 12.24% 1 2.04% 0 0.00% 36 73.47% 49
Uvalde 728 87.29% 92 11.03% 13 1.56% 1 0.12% 636 76.26% 834
Val Verde 446 75.85% 135 22.96% 5 0.85% 2 0.34% 311 52.89% 588
Van Zandt 2,040 69.60% 232 7.92% 648 22.11% 11 0.38% 1,392[a] 47.49% 2,931
Victoria 897 63.44% 476 33.66% 35 2.48% 6 0.42% 421 29.77% 1,414
Walker 763 69.17% 315 28.56% 24 2.18% 1 0.09% 448 40.62% 1,103
Waller 636 77.00% 182 22.03% 6 0.73% 2 0.24% 454 54.96% 826
Ward 178 84.36% 23 10.90% 8 3.79% 2 0.95% 155 73.46% 211
Washington 1,119 46.03% 1,306 53.72% 3 0.12% 3 0.12% -187 -7.69% 2,431
Webb 676 58.89% 472 41.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 204 17.77% 1,148
Wharton 948 67.67% 351 25.05% 85 6.07% 17 1.21% 597 42.61% 1,401
Wheeler 554 79.14% 56 8.00% 83 11.86% 7 1.00% 471[a] 67.29% 700
Wichita 2,108 81.80% 347 13.47% 94 3.65% 28 1.09% 1,761 68.34% 2,577
Wilbarger 1,242 85.13% 99 6.79% 116 7.95% 2 0.14% 1,126[a] 77.18% 1,459
Willacy 110 91.67% 10 8.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 100 83.33% 120
Williamson 2,701 78.27% 656 19.01% 80 2.32% 14 0.41% 2,045 59.26% 3,451
Wilson 869 69.41% 346 27.64% 30 2.40% 7 0.56% 523 41.77% 1,252
Winkler 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21 100.00% 21
Wise 2,023 82.57% 263 10.73% 9 0.37% 155 6.33% 1,760 71.84% 2,450
Wood 1,719 71.77% 248 10.35% 416 17.37% 12 0.50% 1,303[a] 54.41% 2,395
Yoakum 85 97.70% 1 1.15% 1 1.15% 0 0.00% 84 96.55% 87
Young 1,175 84.65% 71 5.12% 71 5.12% 71 5.12% 1,104 79.54% 1,388
Zapata 26 10.83% 214 89.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -188 -78.33% 240
Zavala 229 78.69% 43 14.78% 17 5.84% 2 0.69% 186 63.92% 291
Bailey[b] 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0
Cochran[b] 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0
Hockley[b] 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0
Totals 286,415 76.93% 64,999 17.46% 18,963 5.09% 1,929 0.52% 221,416 59.47% 372,306

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf In this county where Benson ran second ahead of Hughes, margin given is Wilson vote minus Benson vote and percentage margin Wilson percentage minus Benson percentage.
  2. ^ a b c No returns were canvassed for Bailey County, Cochran County or Hockley County. Whatever voters existed in these counties were listed in totals for neighbouring counties

References

  1. ^ "1916 Presidential Election Statistics". Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved 2018-03-05.
  2. ^ "1916 Presidential General Election Results – Texas". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved 2013-08-02.
  3. ^ Texas Secretary of State Elections Division; Supplemental Biennial Report of the Secretary of State 1916
This page was last edited on 31 December 2019, at 23:29
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.
Contact WIKI 2
Introduction
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Disclaimers