To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, an ∞-groupoid is an abstract homotopical model for topological spaces. One model uses Kan complexes which are fibrant objects in the category of simplicial sets (with the standard model structure).[1] It is an ∞-category generalization of a groupoid, a category in which every morphism is an isomorphism.

The homotopy hypothesis states that ∞-groupoids are equivalent to spaces up to homotopy.[2]: 2–3 [3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    3 535
    1 758
    6 893
    63 840
  • Weak Infinity Groupoids in HoTT - Guillaume Brunerie
  • Emily Riehl | Feb 16, 2021 | Elements of ∞-Category Theory
  • Dan Christensen: "Reasoning in an ∞-topos with homotopy type theory"
  • The synthetic theory of ∞-categories vs the synthetic theory of ∞-categories - Emily Riehl
  • Homeomorphism and the group structure on a circle | Algebraic Topology 2 | NJ Wildberger


Globular Groupoids

Alexander Grothendieck suggested in Pursuing Stacks[2]: 3–4, 201  that there should be an extraordinarily simple model of ∞-groupoids using globular sets, originally called hemispherical complexes. These sets are constructed as presheaves on the globular category . This is defined as the category whose objects are finite ordinals and morphisms are given by

such that the globular relations hold
These encode the fact that n-morphisms should not be able to see (n + 1)-morphisms. When writing these down as a globular set , the source and target maps are then written as
We can also consider globular objects in a category as functors
There was hope originally that such a strict model would be sufficient for homotopy theory, but there is evidence suggesting otherwise. It turns out for its associated homotopy -type can never be modeled as a strict globular groupoid for .[2]: 445 [4] This is because strict ∞-groupoids only model spaces with a trivial Whitehead product.[5]


Fundamental ∞-groupoid

Given a topological space there should be an associated fundamental ∞-groupoid where the objects are points , 1-morphisms are represented as paths, 2-morphisms are homotopies of paths, 3-morphisms are homotopies of homotopies, and so on. From this ∞-groupoid we can find an -groupoid called the fundamental -groupoid whose homotopy type is that of .

Note that taking the fundamental ∞-groupoid of a space such that is equivalent to the fundamental n-groupoid . Such a space can be found using the Whitehead tower.

Abelian globular groupoids

One useful case of globular groupoids comes from a chain complex which is bounded above, hence let's consider a chain complex .[6] There is an associated globular groupoid. Intuitively, the objects are the elements in , morphisms come from through the chain complex map , and higher -morphisms can be found from the higher chain complex maps . We can form a globular set with

and the source morphism is the projection map
and the target morphism is the addition of the chain complex map together with the projection map. This forms a globular groupoid giving a wide class of examples of strict globular groupoids. Moreover, because strict groupoids embed inside weak groupoids, they can act as weak groupoids as well.


Higher local systems

One of the basic theorems about local systems is that they can be equivalently described as a functor from the fundamental groupoid to the category of abelian groups, the category of -modules, or some other abelian category. That is, a local system is equivalent to giving a functor

generalizing such a definition requires us to consider not only an abelian category, but also its derived category. A higher local system is then an ∞-functor
with values in some derived category. This has the advantage of letting the higher homotopy groups to act on the higher local system, from a series of truncations. A toy example to study comes from the Eilenberg–MacLane spaces , or by looking at the terms from the Whitehead tower of a space. Ideally, there should be some way to recover the categories of functors from their truncations and the maps whose fibers should be the categories of -functors
Another advantage of this formalism is it allows for constructing higher forms of -adic representations by using the etale homotopy type of a scheme and construct higher representations of this space, since they are given by functors

Higher gerbes

Another application of ∞-groupoids is giving constructions of n-gerbes and ∞-gerbes. Over a space an n-gerbe should be an object such that when restricted to a small enough subset , is represented by an n-groupoid, and on overlaps there is an agreement up to some weak equivalence. Assuming the homotopy hypothesis is correct, this is equivalent to constructing an object such that over any open subset

is an n-group, or a homotopy n-type. Because the nerve of a category can be used to construct an arbitrary homotopy type, a functor over a site , e.g.
will give an example of a higher gerbe if the category lying over any point is a non-empty category. In addition, it would be expected this category would satisfy some sort of descent condition.

See also


  1. ^ "Kan complex in nLab".
  2. ^ a b c Grothendieck. "Pursuing Stacks". Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 Jul 2020. Retrieved 2020-09-17.
  3. ^ Maltsiniotis, Georges (2010), Grothendieck infinity groupoids and still another definition of infinity categories, arXiv:1009.2331, CiteSeerX
  4. ^ Simpson, Carlos (1998-10-09). "Homotopy types of strict 3-groupoids". arXiv:math/9810059.
  5. ^ Brown, Ronald; Higgins, Philip J. (1981). "The equivalence of $\infty $-groupoids and crossed complexes". Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques. 22 (4): 371–386.
  6. ^ Ara, Dimitri (2010). Sur les ∞-groupoïdes de Grothendieck et une variante ∞-catégorique (PDF) (PhD). Université Paris Diderot. Section 1.4.3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 Aug 2020.

Research articles

Applications in algebraic geometry

External links

This page was last edited on 8 March 2024, at 23:38
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.