To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power
AuthorBenjamin K. Sovacool
SubjectNuclear power
PublisherWorld Scientific
Publication date
2011
Pages296
ISBN978-981-4322-75-1
OCLC741924362

Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy is a 2011 book by Benjamin K. Sovacool, published by World Scientific. Sovacool's book addresses the current status of the global nuclear power industry, its fuel cycle, nuclear accidents, environmental impacts, social risks, energy payback, nuclear power economics, and industry subsidies. There is a postscript on the Japanese 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster.[1] Based on detailed analysis, Sovacool concludes "that a global nuclear renaissance would bring immense technical, economic, environmental, political, and social costs". He says that it is renewable energy technologies which will enhance energy security, and which have many other advantages.[1][2][3][4]

The book says the marginal levelized cost for "a 1,000-MWe facility built in 2009 would be 41.2 to 80.3 cents/kWh, presuming one actually takes into account construction, operation and fuel, reprocessing, waste storage, and decommissioning."[5]

In a review by author Mark Diesendorf the book "reviews the little-known research which shows that the life-cycle CO2 emissions of nuclear power may become comparable with those of fossil power as high-grade uranium ore is used up over the next several decades and low-grade uranium is mined and milled using fossil fuels".[1] Diesendorf says that one weakness of the book is the limited coverage of nuclear weapons proliferation. He says that governments of several countries (e.g., France, India, North Korea, Pakistan) have used nuclear power and/or research reactors to assist nuclear weapons development or to contribute to their supplies of nuclear explosives from military reactors.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    332
    18 452
    1 841 869
  • India-China Strategic Relations and the Nuclear Dimension - Part 2
  • WHY KINETIC ENERGY PROJECTILE OF U.S IS STRONG ANSWER TO RUSSIA’S TACTICAL NUKE?
  • WORLDS MOST POWERFUL GUN !! US Secret Military Weapons # FULL VIDEO

Transcription

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Mark Diesendorf (2013). "Book review: Contesting the future of nuclear power" (PDF). Energy Policy.
  2. ^ Benjamin K. Sovacool (2011). "The "Self-Limiting" Future of Nuclear Power" (PDF). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power. World Scientific. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-05-15. Retrieved 2011-07-29.
  3. ^ Dave Elliot (25 June 2011). "Nuclear – a powerful case against". Environmental Research Web.
  4. ^ Annabelle Quince (30 March 2011). "The history of nuclear power". ABC Radio National.
  5. ^ Sovacool, p. 126.

External links


This page was last edited on 4 December 2023, at 06:05
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.