To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1967

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

UN Security Council
Resolution 1967
Date19 January 2011
Meeting no.6,469
CodeS/RES/1967 (Document)
SubjectThe situation in Côte d'Ivoire
Voting summary
  • 15 voted for
  • None voted against
  • None abstained
ResultAdopted
Security Council composition
Permanent members
Non-permanent members
← 1966 Lists of resolutions 1968 →

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1967, adopted unanimously on January 19, 2011, after recalling previous resolutions on the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast), including resolutions 1933 (2010), 1942 (2010), 1946 (2010), 1951 (2010) and 1962 (2010), the Council increased the number of forces in the United Nations Operation in Côte d'Ivoire (UNOCI) by 2,000.[1] It was the first Security Council resolution adopted in 2011.

The resolution would bolster the United Nations peacekeeping forces to 12,000.[2]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/2
    Views:
    788
    315
  • U.N. (SC) Resolution 242
  • Resolution 242

Transcription

Resolution

Observations

In the preamble of the resolution, the Council recalled that the Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon had recommended the deployment of 2,000 additional peacekeepers on a temporary basis until June 30, 2011, in addition to those authorised in Resolution 1942. The troops may be redeployed between the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) and UNOCI, in accordance with Resolution 1609 (2005).

Meanwhile, there was concern at the human rights situation in Côte d'Ivoire and ongoing violence.

Acts

Acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Council authorised an additional 2,000 troops for UNOCI to remain in the country, along with those authorised in Resolution 1942, until June 30, 2011. Three infantry companies and an aviation unit from UNMIL were authorised to remain in Côte d'Ivoire for a further four weeks if necessary, while three armed helicopters were to be transferred from UNMIL to UNOCI for the same period. The resolution also authorised the deployment of 60 additional police to deal with unarmed crowds.[3] All temporary arrangements would be reviewed by the Secretary-General by March 31, 2011.

The Council demanded that all parties respect the safety and freedom of movement of UNOCI, other United Nations personnel and supporting French forces. Furthermore, it demanded that, without prejudice to freedom of expression, that state media including Radiodiffusion Télévision Ivoirienne, cease propagating false information about the United Nations and incitement to hatred and violence. The Council reiterated the threat of sanctions for those that impeded the work of UNOCI.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Amid deteriorating security situation, ongoing political impasse in Côte d'Ivoire, Security Council bolsters peacekeeping mission there by 2,000 additional troops". United Nations. January 19, 2011.
  2. ^ "UN to boost Cote d'Ivoire forces". Al Jazeera. January 19, 2011.
  3. ^ Lynch, Colum (January 20, 2011). "U.N. to send more peacekeepers to Ivory Coast". The Washington Post.

External links

This page was last edited on 3 February 2024, at 05:13
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.