To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

The T.J. Hooper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

THE T. J. HOOPER; THE NORTHERN NO. 30 AND NO. 17; THE MONTROSE; In re EASTERN TRANSP. CO.; NEW ENGLAND COAL & COKE CO. v. NORTHERN BARGE CORPORATION; H. N. HARTWELL & SON, Inc., v. SAME.
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Full case nameThe T.J. Hooper
DecidedJuly 21 1932
Citation(s)The T. J. Hooper, 60 F.2d 737, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 2592
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingLearned Hand, Thomas Walter Swan, Augustus Noble Hand
Case opinions
MajorityHand, joined by Swan, Hand

The T.J. Hooper, 60 F.2d 737 (2d. Cir. 1932)[1] is a 1932 admiralty law decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.[2] The case is commonly known by the name of one of the vessels involved.

Background

In March 1928, two barges, belonging to the Northern Barge Company, had lifted cargoes of coal at Norfolk, Virginia, for New York. They were towed by tugboats, the "Montrose" and the "Hooper," and were lost off the Jersey Coast on March tenth, in an easterly gale.

As a result, the cargo owners sued the barges, the owner of the barges sued the tugs, and the owner of the tug filed a petition to limit its liability.

Ruling

Judge Learned Hand wrote the majority opinion for the court; he stated that even though there was not a custom for these ships to be equipped with a radio at the time, it was unreasonable for them not to.

References

  1. ^ The T.J. Hooper, 60 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1932)
  2. ^ Richard Epstein (1991). "The Path to The T. J. Hooper: The Theory and History of Custom in the Law of Tort". University of Chicago Law School. University of Chicago. Retrieved 3 December 2020.
This page was last edited on 16 May 2022, at 18:07
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.