To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

The Crest of the Peacock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics
AuthorGeorge Gheverghese Joseph
LanguageEnglish
SubjectHistory of mathematics
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication date
1991
Pages592
ISBN9780691135267

The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics is a book authored by George Gheverghese Joseph, and was first published by Princeton University Press in 1991. The book was brought out as a response to view of the history of mathematics epitomized by Morris Kline's statement that, comparing to what the Greeks achieved, "the mathematics of Egyptians and Babylonians is the scrawling of children just learning to write, as opposed to great literature",[1] criticised by Joseph as "Eurocentric".[2] The third edition of the book was released in 2011.[3]

The book is divided into 11 chapters. Chapter 1 provides a lengthy justification for the book. Chapter 2 is devoted to a discussion of the mathematics of Native Americans and Chapter 3 to the mathematics of ancient Egyptians. The next two chapters consider the mathematics of Mesopotamia, then there are two chapters on Chinese mathematics, three chapters on Indian mathematics, and the final chapter discusses Islamic mathematics.

Plagiarism

C. K. Raju accused Joseph and Dennis Almerida of plagiarism [4] of his decade long scholastic work [5] that began in 1998 for the Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture funded by the Indian Academy of Sciences concerning Indian mathematics and its possible knowledge transfer. An ethics investigation of the research team of George Gheverghese Joseph and Dennis Almeida led to the dismissal of Dennis Almeida by University of Exeter [6] and the University of Manchester posting an erratum and acknowledgement of C.K. Raju's work.[7]

G. G. Joseph denies the charges.[8][9]

Reviews

References

  1. ^ Joseph (1991), p. 177 misquotes Kline by replacing "Babylonians" by "Mesopotamians". The actual quote from Kline is "Compared with the accomplishments of their immediate successors, the Greeks, the mathematics of the Egyptians and Babylonians is the scrawling of children just learning to write as opposed to great literature." Morris Kline (1962). Mathematics: A Cultural Approach. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. p. 14., Mathematics for Liberal Arts (1967), re-published as Mathematics for the Nonmathematician (1985), p. 14.
  2. ^ Clemency Montelle (December 2013). "Book Review" (PDF). Notices of the AMS: 1459–1463. Retrieved 5 March 2016.
  3. ^ The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics Third Edition. Princeton University. 24 October 2010. ISBN 9780691135267. Retrieved 5 March 2016.
  4. ^ "Summary table of plagiarism by Joseph and Almeida" (PDF).
  5. ^ C.K. Raju. (2007). Cultural Foundations of Mathematics. Pearson Longman. ISBN 978-81-317-0871-2
  6. ^ "Prof Raju's charge of plagiarism found correct" (PDF).
  7. ^ "Indians predated Newton 'discovery' by 250 years".
  8. ^ "Indian claims Brit study on calculus was plagiarised" Times of India/ Hindustan Times (Aug 20, 2007)
  9. ^ "Hindustan Times Correction". 2007-08-25.


This page was last edited on 16 October 2023, at 12:12
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.