Telecommunications policy of the United States

The telecommunications policy of the United States is a framework of law directed by government and the regulatory commissions, most notably the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Two landmark acts prevail today, the Communications Act of 1934 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The latter was intended to revise the first act and specifically to foster competition in the telecommunications industry.^[1]

Aims

In the name of public interest, a large proportion of telecommunications policy is concerned with the economic regulation of interstate and international communication. This includes all communication by radio, telephone, wire, cable and satellite.^[2] Telecommunications policy outlines antitrust laws as is common for industries with large barriers to entry. Other features of the policies addressed include common carrier laws which controls access to networks. While the telephone providers are required to be common carriers, there is an ongoing net neutrality debate about the obligations of ISP's.^[3]

Telecommunication policy addresses the management of government-owned resources such as the spectrum, which facilitates all wireless communications. There is a naturally limited quantity of usable spectrum that exists, therefore the market demand is immense, especially as use of mobile technology, which uses the electromagnetic spectrum, expands. One of the goals of the FCC is to best utilize this limited resource in such a way will bring about the "highest and best use".^[4] License to use spectrum was originally determined by committee, however, since 1993 it has been determined by an auction to assure that the licensee is both qualified and motivated to make best use of this commodity.^[5]

• For example, an FM station in Iowa was recently auctioned for $4,397,250.^[6]

The famous American Telephone & Telegraph (AT&T) empire was once based on the concept that they had the duty and honor of serving the public people in return for their monopoly on the telecommunication industry.^[7]

• National Security: With the recent events of our world, such as the September 11 attacks, Hurricane Katrina, and others it has been deemed essential that we have in place a dedicated network with ample spectrum for crisis communication. The National Telecommunication and Information Administration (NTIA) manages spectrum used by the Federal government such as air traffic control and national defense. The FCC is responsible for spectrum used by others, including individuals and public safety and health officials like police and emergency medical technicians.^[8]

Institutional framework in the U.S.

• Independent Regulatory Commissions
• FCC, state PUCs (Public Utility Commissions)
• Delegation Doctrine: statutory authority
  • quasi-legislative, executive and judicial functions
• Legislative role (delegation, oversight, budget)
• Executive role (appointment, budget)
• Judicial role (review commission decisions)

The hallmark event in the history of the US telecommunication industry was the breakup of the Bell System into regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) or "Baby Bells" in the early 1980s.

The challenge since remains preserving competition and no longer allowing monopolies.^{[citation needed]}

There are a number of agencies concerned with telecommunication policy:

• The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
• The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

Broadband deployment policy objectives

The FCC derives its jurisdiction to facilitate the deployment of broadband to Americans in Section 706 in the Telecommunications act of 1996. In this section the code states that the FCC is to “encourage the deployment on a reasonable and timely basis of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans.”^[9] They currently want to advocate the following objectives:

• Broaden the deployment of broadband technologies
• Define broadband to include any platform capable of transmitting high-bandwidth intensive services
• Ensure harmonized regulatory treatment of competing broadband services
• Encourage and facilitate an environment that stimulates investment and innovation in broadband technologies and services^[10]

Current challenges

• Regulation of Internet Protocol (IP) transport
• Is Unbundled Network Element (UNE) competition viable?
• Is there really room for multiple fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) networks?
• Interconnection and "open access"
• Content/conduit bundling
• FCC spectrum policy: evolution of flexibility of use
• How to regulate the bottleneck using the LoopCo regulatory regime.
• How should municipal broadband networks be regulated?
• Cyber warfare and electronic privacy rights
• Fighting the duopoly battle- Unfortunately many users in the United States are presented with only two service provider options, cable modem or DSL. In some cases, they may not even have that choice.^[11]

Wire line and wireless telecommunication policy

Currently,^[when?] the policy being set forth by the FCC has two different levels of regulation. One for fixed line, wire line communications and the other for wireless communications. Their current tenets strictly regulate network neutrality on wire line networks.

However the commission is placing as many mandates on wireless communications. This means that wireless telecommunications providers are not permitted to block any website, but they may block applications and services unless they are direct competitors to the provider's content or services. This difference between the two technologies creates a major loophole in telecommunications policy, as most providers have already begun the shift from wired to wireless network infrastructures.^[12]

See also

References

This page was last edited on 17 March 2024, at 23:50