Silverman v. United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued December 5, 1960 Decided March 6, 1961 | |
Full case name | Silverman v. United States |
Citations | 365 U.S. 505 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. |
Holding | |
A federal officer may not, without warrant, physically entrench into a person's office or home to secretly observe or listen and relate at the man's subsequent criminal trial what was seen or heard. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stewart, joined unanimously |
Concurrence | Douglas |
Concurrence | Clark, joined by Whittaker |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV |
Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505 (1961), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that a federal officer may not, without warrant, physically place themselves into the space of a person's office or home to secretly observe or listen and relate at the man's subsequent criminal trial what was seen or heard.
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:20 9168 0925 485
-
Is Christianity Good for America? David Silverman vs Alex McFarland
-
White People in Solidarity Against Racism: Dara Silverman and Chris Crass
-
David Silverman Debate: Evolution & "Morality" of the Bible Part 1
Transcription
External links
- Text of Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505 (1961) is available from: Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
![](/s/i/modif.png)