To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Red Sea Dam
The proposal is to dam the narrow inlet to the Red Sea, shown at the bottom-right of the image.
LocationDjibouti
Yemen
Coordinates12°33′25″N 43°22′20″E / 12.55694°N 43.37222°E / 12.55694; 43.37222
Dam and spillways
ImpoundsBab-el-Mandeb Strait
Length29 km (18 mi)
Power Station
Installed capacity50,000 MW

The Red Sea Dam is a speculative macro-engineering proposal put forward in 2007 by a group of scientists and engineers.[1] Although the authors' intentions are to explore "the ethical and environmental dilemmas and some of the political implications of macro-engineering", the proposal has attracted both criticism and ridicule.[2]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    8 387 307
    4 910 134
    6 726 100
  • Africa’s $5BN Megadam Will Block the Nile
  • Engineering Connections: Earthquake Proof Bridge (Richard Hammond) | Science Documentary
  • The Engineering Marvel called Panama Canal

Transcription

Proposal

The idea is to dam the Red Sea at its southern end where the Bab-al-Mandab Strait is only 29 km (18 mi) wide. Natural evaporation would rapidly lower the level of the enclosed Red Sea, by about 2.1 meters per year (6.8 feet per year).[3] Water rushing back into the sea would then drive turbines to generate electricity. The dam would have the potential to generate 50 gigawatts of emissions-free hydroelectric power. In comparison, the largest nuclear power plant in the United States has an output of 3.2 gigawatts.[4]

Implications

The proposal's authors point out that "Macro-engineering projects of this size cause massive destruction of existing ecologies", a point emphasized by critics[5] who note the damage caused by current, far smaller schemes.

The authors also note the benefits of the project. Besides helping to satisfy the region's growing energy needs, there are environmental benefits to the scheme: "On the positive side of the environmental scale, however, are the big reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and the reduced pace of fossil hydrocarbon resource exhaustion".

Peter Bosshard,[6] policy director of International Rivers in California, an anti-dam organization, condemned the scheme as ludicrous.

See also

References

  1. ^ Power from closing the Red Sea: Economic and ecological costs and benefits following the isolation of the Red Sea by Roelof Dirk Schuiling, Viorel Badescu, Richard B. Cathcart, Jihan Seoud, Jaap C. Hanekamp
  2. ^ New Scientist critique
  3. ^ Andrea Thompson published (2007-12-06). "Dam on Red Sea Would Harm Environment". livescience.com. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
  4. ^ Ling, Frank. "Dam the Red Sea for power?". CNET. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
  5. ^ Live Science on the environmental impact
  6. ^ Red Sea mega-dam would be 'irresponsible' New Scientist, 07 December 2007 by Phil McKenna

External links

This page was last edited on 23 December 2023, at 00:47
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.