To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Pedimental sculpture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neoclassical pediment of La Madeleine Church, Paris, with sculpture (1826–1834) by Philippe Joseph Henri Lemaire[1]

Pedimental sculpture is a form of architectural sculpture designed for installation in the tympanum, the space enclosed by the architectural element called the pediment. Originally a feature of Ancient Greek architecture, pedimental sculpture started as a means to decorate a pediment in its simplest form: a low triangle, like a gable, above an horizontal base or entablature.[2] However, as classical architecture developed from the basis of Ancient Greek and Roman architecture, the varieties of pedimental sculpture also developed. The sculpture can be either freestanding or relief sculpture, in which case it is attached to the back wall of the pediment. Harris in The Illustrated Dictionary of Historic Architecture defines pediment as "In classical architecture, the triangular gable end of the roof above the horizontal cornice, often filled with sculpture." Pediments can also be used to crown doors or windows.[3]

Reconstruction, including casts, of the East pediment of the Temple of Zeus, Olympia, c. 460 BCE, Pushkin Museum, Moscow

In Romanesque architecture, and very often in Gothic architecture, the tympanum is usually semi-circular at the top, and the sculptural groups, usually with religious subjects, adapted to fit the new spaces. In the Renaissance triangular pediments returned, as gradually did sculptural groups within them, becoming very popular for important buildings in the 19th century.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    75 232
    90 727
    346
    1 391
    38 526
  • East and West Pediments, Temple of Aphaia, Aegina
  • Phidias, Parthenon sculptures
  • Ancient Greek Art: The Pediment from the Temple of Artemis at Corcyra
  • 'George Segal: Body Language' Tour
  • Siphnian Treasury, Delphi

Transcription

(lighthearted music) Man: We're in the Glyphtothek in Munich. This is an extraordinary museum devoted to ancient Greek and Roman antiquities. Woman: That's all thanks to Prince Ludwig of Bavaria, who in the early 19th century, said he wanted to found a collection of antique works of sculpture, because, as he said, "We must also have in Munich "what in Rome in known as a museum." Man: I love that. Museum wasn't even a commonly used word. The idea of a public collection was just coming into being in Britain, in France, and here in Germany. Woman: Ludwig was ambitious for Munich; he wrote, "I will turn Munich into a city of the arts, so that no one can claim to know Germany who has not also seen Munich." Man: Art was a way of really putting a city on a map. It spoke to its cultural superiority. Ludwig put together an incredible collection. Woman: We're looking now at one of the great treasures of the museum, the sculptures from the pediment of the temple of Aphaia, on the island of Aegina, just off the coast of Greece. Man: This is an island that's visible from Athens, so it's very close to the Greek mainland; and we really shouldn't say 'pediment', we should say 'pediments'. Let's impact that just a little bit. On a Greek temple, imagine the Parthenon. This is a long structure, with a gable at either end that is above the column head. At either short end of the temple there is a low triangle. Historically, those were areas that were filled with sculpture. Woman: On the Temple of Aphaia there was a pediment on the east side and on the west side, on the two short ends of the temple. The sculptures that filled these pediments were discovered in the early 19th century when some German architects were surveying the ruins of the temple, and they were soon put on auction, and Ludwig was very pleased to acquire them for his new museum. Man: The pediment sculptures were not made at the same moment, and that makes them even more interesting, because it helps us see the evolution of Greek sculpture. The west pediment [with] earlier, and we think that those sculptures were carved when the temple was actually built, about 490 B.C.E. The east side were later, and what's really intresting is those older west sculptures are in the archaic tradition, but the east pediment sculptures are just taking on the characteristics of the style that we'll come to know as the classical. Woman: We can say it's an early moment of the classical for the sculptures on the east pediment. Man: It's this moment of transition, as the style is just really being invented. Woman: Now, the subject for both pediments was the Trojan war, the War between the Trojans and the Greeks. Man: Now, this war is really a mythic war, but we know about it because it is the subject of Homer's great epic poem, "The Iliad." Woman: Some of the heroes of the Trojan War were from the island of Aegina, so it makes sense that they would make an appearance on the pediment. Man: Let's start off by looking at the sculptures on the western pediment. In terms of being a space that gets filled with sculpture, a pediment is an awkward environment. Woman: It's incredibly awkward, because you have these two narrow areas of the triangle that are very hard to fill. One of the ways that you can do that is to have reclining figures. Man: That's right. It's almost as if the sculptures have to play limbo, they get lower and lower as you move to the edges. But, in this case, the sculptor has really been inventive, and has found a marvelous solution. In the very center of the pediment, on both the east and the west sides, we have a standing figure, noble, looking outward, the goddess Athena. Woman: Athena was known as the goddess of war, in addition to being the goddess of wisdom. Man: On the west pediment, we see Athena now holding a modern shaft that is meant to represent a spear that would have originally been there, perhaps in wood, more likely in bronze or some other metal. Woman: When we look at Athena, we see a figure who looks typically archaic in style. She is frontal, she's rather rigid, fairly symetrical, and there's a lineal quality to her drapery. She has that typical archaic smile that removes her from emotion, removes her from the everyday world. She seems like a transcendent goddess. Man: On either side of the standing Athena are two warriors, and they move outward. They're actually lunging with the spears. One has their shield facing us, one is turned in the other direction, the shield is facing away from us; but they move our eye in either direction outward with real energy, real velocity, and of course, they are both slightly lower since their knees are bent so that they fit under the eave of the gable. Woman: On either side of those figures, we see kneeling archers, who are shooting bows. Man: The archer on the left, we can actually identify as Paris, and we can see his cap is tied in the back, his weight is on one knee and on one heel. The bow is missing, but we can certainly see an arm movement that suggests that he was in the middle of loosing his arrow. Woman: Behind him, a striding figure with a weapon who's attacking a figure who's falling to the ground. Man: Look at the complexity of that group of three in the way in which they overlap. There's a real sense of energy. There's a real sense of dynamism. Just pretty extraordinary for the archaic moment. Woman: On the far left corner, another wounded figure just fits into that corner space. Man: Let's focus for a moment on the wounded warrior that is on the right side of the west pediment. You can see that he's fallen back. He's on his left hip and he's on his left elbow, and his right hand seems to be clutching, or perhaps trying to remove a spear that has wounded him. Woman: Let me stop you for a moment, because he doesn't really look like he's in the position of a wounded warrior. His knee is bent, it comes over his left leg, he's propped up on his left arm, and his right elbow comes up in a rather awkward way. This figure really doesn't seem believable in terms of what he's supposed to be doing, pulling this spear from his body. Man:That's right, this must be tremendously painful, and probably will kill him, and yet, look at his face; he still retains the archaic smile, but for all of this it's important to remember that this is not naturalism, this is not an attempt to render the feelings of the human body. This is a highly stylized [for a schematic] structure. Woman: In a way, the figure is a symbol more than a real figure; a symbol of a fallen warrior in the Trojan War. Man: One art historian is likened this figure to face painting, where there was an attempt often to raise torsos up so that you could see the full musculature in the entire front; so, this is not about naturalism, it's about revealing the body in a way. Woman: The same art historian likened this figure to a reclining kouros, and that's exactly how he looks. It's as though a standing kouros figure has been tipped over. This is so different than what we see on the east pediment, which dates from only about a decade or two later, where we see the beginnings of the classical style. Man: Let's go take a look. Now, the east pediment is much more fragmentary on the left side, but the one figure of the fallen soldier is in great condition, and it's so different from what we saw, the earlier archaic west facade. Woman: While this figure still has a bit of that archaic smile, everything else about the position of his body tells us that this is a wounded figure taking his last breath. Man: You can see that he is holding his sword with his right hand, but he's also trying to push himself back up, but he doesn't seem to be able to do it. His left arm is still in the shield, and he seems to be balancing himself. You know it's just a moment before that shield falls over with a bang. Woman: There's a sense that he's propping himself up, but he's also falling at the same time, lowering his body as he dies. Man: He's looking down at the ground, and his body is more mature than the other figure, it's also much more naturalistically rendered. We're seeing that origin of the classical tradition. Woman: In the archaic period, we see the hard divisions between the muscles and the parts of the body, outlines almost, to parts of the body, and here, one muscle flows into another, and there's a real sense of skin lying over a skeletal structure. Man: That's right. A moment ago, you had said that the archaic sculpture was nothing but really a set of symbols, and here it's as if the artist has actually observed a human body and thought about what it must be like for a figure to fall. Woman: Instead of having that back leg coming over the front leg in a very unnatural way, and instead of having that elbow lifted up, the right arm of the figure comes over his torso fully; there's no attempt to reveal the whole body tipped forward to us the way we had in the archaic figure. Man: Now look at the torso. Look at the muscles of the leg. This is a far, more complex rendering of the human body in a complex pose. Woman: Just like on the west pediment, as we look at the east pediment, we've got a central figure again, Athena. Man: To the right of Athena, we have figures that are much more in tact. We have a lunging figure, we saw that on the west pediment as well, who is in the process of impaling a man who has lost his helmet, his shield is falling off his arm, and he is tottering, he has lost his balance. Woman: He looks as though he's about to collapse. Man: We know he's lost his helmet because the young man who's in back of him who seems to be trying to aid him and running towards him, is holding a fragment that we know would have originally been his helmet. Woman: His body forms a diagonal in that lunge, and so it fits nicely into that triangular space of the pediment. Behind him is another archer just like we saw on the west pediment. Man: Archaeologists think that archer is actually the one who has hit the wounded warrior on the opposite side. Woman: The one who we were discussing before. Man: That's right. Woman: So, we have this wonderful unification of action among all of these figures on the east pediment. Man: We have this more complex narrative, even though the same story is being told. We have a much more complex musculature, much more careful attention to the human experience. This makes us ask what has changed? This just been a few years between these pediments, and yet they are so different. Woman: This is always the questions that art historians ask as we look at works of art that are separated not by a very long period of time, in this case. What has happened in the values of ancient Greek culture that has led them to represent the human figure so differently. Man: If you go back in Greek history, the Greeks were deeply influenced by monumental Egyptian sculpture. You can still get a sense of a trace of that in the archaic tradition, but now there's a sense of self-awareness. These are mobile figrues out in the world that are almost enacting human emotion, human expression, and human experience. That is so different from the idea of representation as symbolic, which it so informed earlier Greek art. Woman: In the classical period, we have figures who we can believe are part of a story, it's a story that we can begin to feel for them, we can sympathize with them as we watch them. This is a moement in ancient Greek history when the Greeks have just defeated the Persians in battle; this is an epic victory for Greek culture when many of the Greek city states united to fight their enemy, the Persians. Man: Right, this common enemy that really should have been victorious, the Persians should have won, it was a much larger army; and the Greeks knew it, and the fact that they were victorious suggested to them that there was a kind of order in the universe. Woman: There's a sense now that the world is into place that just operates arbitrarily according to the laws of the gods, but it's a place that the human mind, with its sense of the rational, can understand. Man: So, there is a much greater burden placed on the Greeks with this realization. They are now responsible for their own society. They're not part of a random order, they are part of an order that they actually devise. Woman: Art historians see the origins of the classical style in this historical moment. We have an obligation, even here in the 21st century, to try to put ourselves, even though it's an impossible task, in the minds of the ancient Greeks, and to truly understand these works of arts from their point of view. It's really important ot remember that these sculptures were painted just like all ancient Greek sculptures, and with very bright colors. Man: This completely destroys our image of Greek art. When we think about Greek art, we think about these pristine, brillian, white marble surfaces, and they were garish; they were yellow, they were blue, they were green. Woman: Art historians and archaeologists have done scientific analyses of these sculptures, and found traces and residues of pigments and been able to determine it pretty acurately, at least the red and blues that we find here in some of the geometric patterns. Man: It's so jarring for me to try to imagine these colors back, and it's not just that the figures themselves were painted, but the architectural spaces in which these figures were placed was painted as well. Woman: There are so many ways that we're not looking at these the way that the ancient Greeks did. First of all, these were outside in the open air. They were high up on a pediment on this island. Man: Certainly the color would have made it much easier to see these figures, would try to have been in the shade of architecture. There's another element that we can re-imagine, which is that these figures not only holding things that have since disappeared, they were holding spears, and bows and arrows, but they also had other pieces of metal work that have since been lost. There was hair, sometimes actually hanging like bangs over the forehead, and also long locks that came down and framed the faces. In this case, they were made out of lead, and we can actually see little pieces of the remaining lead that are still there, and so we know precisely where they came out of stone, and that would have helped, I think, create not these figures as single stone objects the way that we see them, but as these much more complex figures that interact with their architectural environments. Woman: Let's not forget, too, that these are temples. These are places of religious worship, and that they were homes to the gods, and that the central figure on both the east and west pediment is the goddess Athena; and of course, the Greek idea of gods and goddesses is entirely different from our own Judeo-Christian tradition. These are all important things to keep in mind as we look at the Greek sculptures in museums. (lighthearted music)

History

The "earliest pedimental composition to have survived," from the Early Archaic Period, from the Temple of Artemis, Corfu, about 580–570 BCE, now Archaeological Museum of Corfu.

Ancient Greek architecture

The pediment begins in Ancient Greek architecture; according to the mid-fifth century BCE poet Pindar, it was a Corinthian invention.[4] It is possible that it was devised specifically to contain sculpture, which from the early 6th century became "customary (though never obligatory)" in Doric temples; in Ionic ones it was a "rarity".[5] A difference between the ancient Greek temple and temples of other, older, cultures of the Near East was that the visual effect and decoration of the exterior exceeded that of the interiors and exteriors behind the main facade.[6] Like the other forms of exterior decoration such as statues, antefixes, and acroteria, the pedimental sculptures were originally in terracotta and coloured.[7]

The "earliest pedimental composition to have survived," from the Early Archaic Period, was from the Temple of Artemis, Corfu, about 580–570 BCE.[8][9] Large parts of the sculptural group are in the Archaeological Museum of Corfu, including the central figure of the winged gorgon Medusa, flanked by two crouching lions. Richter points out that the "weak points are the lack of concerted action and unity as well as the ludicrously small scale of the side figures compared with the central Gorgon."[9]

Gorgons and gorgon heads were the most common early pedimental sculptures, as an architectural version of the gorgoneion apotropaic amulet, which both Athena and Zeus are said to have worn as a pendant.[10] Greek temples with pediment sculptures usually had them at both ends of the temple, and tended to have contrasting scenes, one perhaps a peaceful scene with deities, and the other with a battle or dramatic scene from mythology.

Apollo struggling with Heracles, Siphnian Treasury at Delphi (about 525 BCE)

Over the next decades refinements were made in the design and carving of pedimental sculpture, the small "Hydra pediment" in Athens (about 570 BCE), the "Bluebeard pediment from the 'old Athena temple' the Siphnian Treasury at Delphi (about 525 BCE), the Megarian Treasury at Olympia (about 520–510 BCE), the temple to Aphaia at Aigina (about 500–480 BCE), the Temple of Zeus at Olympia (about 465–460 BCE, the remains of the Eastern pediment of the Temple of Zeus at Olympia are in the site museum) and others, but "they did not satisfy the Greek sculptor for long." Finally, in the Parthenon pediments (about 438–432) "we reach the climax of Greek pedimental composition". After the Parthenon there is no outstanding pedimental composition, at least now known.[9]

In the late or Hellenistic phase of Etruscan art, after about 300 BCE, Greek-style groups were introduced, but in terracotta rather than stone; some large fragments of these have survived.[11] The Romans also used terracotta,[12] but also stone for the grandest temples. An Amazonomachy in marble on the Temple of Apollo Sosianus in Rome, whose fragments were excavated in the 1930s, is thought to be a Greek work of the 5th century BCE, removed by the Romans from a temple there in the 1st century CE. Allusions to the recent Battle of Actium have been proposed.[13] The group on the final rebuilding of the Capitoline Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus is known from literary descriptions and depictions in other works of art, but none of it is known to survive.[14]

The Parthenon

Triglyphs and metopes in place on the west pediment; the 3rd and 4th figures from the left below.

The Parthenon's west pediment depicted the contest between Athena and Poseidon over Attica and the east pediment the birth of Athena.[15] Classical archeologists since Johann Joachim Winckelmann's Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums (published 1764) have recognized Greek pediment sculpture, in particular the pediments of the Parthenon, as the standard of the highest-quality art in antiquity.[16] For Martin Schede, writing in 1923, the remains of limestone pediments, although "badly shattered indeed," represented "the highest artistic achievement of two generations of a most artistic people," the value of which was impossible to overestimate.[17] The travel writer Solomon Charles Kaines Smith specifically named the "Three Fates" of the east pediment the "highest surviving achievement of Greek sculpture,"[18] and for Wincklemann's contemporary Ennio Quirino Visconti the Parthenon pediments "met the criteria for the best artists of the best period."[19] The Parthenon compositions are considered to be the magnum opus of Classical pedimental decoration.[20]

Awareness of the Parthenon pediments, almost the only classical example to substantially survive in situ to the Renaissance, and eventually highly influential, increased only gradually in Western Europe. They were first drawn, not accurately, in 1436 by Ciriaco de' Pizzicolli. It grew significantly over the 17th century, especially as numerous careful drawings were made in Athens in 1674 by Jacques Carrey, a member of Charles Le Brun's workshop, who was sent in the suite of Charles Marie François Olier, marquis de Nointel, the French ambassador to Constantinople to make drawings. These were made before the sculptures were greatly damaged in an explosion in 1687. The drawings had all reached Paris by Carrey's return in 1679, and contain crucial evidence as to the original appearance of the portions that were destroyed.[21]

The British Museum holds 17 figurative pedimental sculptures from the Parthenon, as part of the so-called Elgin Marbles, in their permanent collection.[22] The rest of the pedimental sculpture from the Parthenon is now on display in the Acropolis Museum at Athens.

Reconstruction of the sculptures on the west pediment of the Parthenon; the quarrel between Athena and Poseidon to be the tutelary deity of Athens.

Post-classical

Sculptures above lintels continued to be produced, indeed became more common, in post-classical architectural styles, but in recent times the medieval examples tend not to be called "pedimental sculptures", although it is technically correct to do so. "Tympanum reliefs" is a more common term, as these are now mostly in a relatively low relief, and less than life-size, as they are lower down the building, over doorways, and so closer to the observer than on classical temples. They are typically framed by round tops in Romanesque architecture, and pointed Gothic arch shapes in Gothic architecture. In both cases the composition was often arranged in tiers, with many small figures making up a Christian scene, sometimes dominated by a much larger Christ in Majesty or a Virgin Mary. There are often supporting figures on the archivolts to the sides, and on the lintel below.

Renaissance and Baroque

Andrea Palladio's Tempietto Barbaro (c. 1583)

The low triangular pediment was revived, initially mainly for the main facade of churches, in Renaissance architecture, but at first the triangular tympanum was left plain or only decorated with a round window, or sometimes a round motif such as a star. The cathedral at Pienza (c. 1460), with the coat of arms of Pope Pius II is one of the earliest examples to feature the arms of the donor of the church. This became common by the next century, as at Saint Peter's Basilica and the Church of the Gesù (completed 1584), both in Rome. Heraldic sculpture was to remain extremely common in tympani, especially as the triangular pediment spread to large houses.[2]

Most buildings with pediments by Andrea Palladio followed the simpler formulae, but some of his villas around the Veneto feature large sprawling figures supporting the coat of arms, so that most of the tympanum is filled. Examples are the Villa Barbaro (completed c. 1558) and Villa Emo (by 1561). The small Tempietto Barbaro near the villa (c. 1583) has a composition in stucco with eight figures filling the space; like some other examples this seems to have been added after the rest of the building was finished, and the designer and sculptor are unknown.

Such compositions remained uncommon in Baroque architecture, even in the grandest buildings, and somewhat unexpectedly are found more often north of the Alps, with many in Protestant countries. Examples include crowded scenes, all in relief, at Saint Paul's Cathedral (Conversion of Saint Paul), the south front of Hampton Court Palace (Hercules Triumphing Over Envy, by Caius Cibber),[23] both buildings by Christopher Wren, and the Royal Palace of Amsterdam (1655, built as the City Hall). The expansion of the Louvre Palace under Louis XIV included much pedimental sculpture filling various shapes of tympanum. Buildings with military connections could surround heraldic devices with trophies of arms and armour to fill the whole space, as at Blenheim Palace and many Central European palaces, such as Nieborów Palace (on both fronts, in stucco). Otherwise, flanking angels or winged Victory figures, strapwork or other ornamental motifs, could fill the rest of the triangle.

Heraldic sculptures

Neoclassicism

Facade of Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid, pediment sculpture by Agustí Querol Subirats, 1892–1903

The arrival of Neoclassical architecture favoured the return of large free-standing figure compositions in the pediments of important buildings, with Vilnius Cathedral (by 1783) one of the earliest in the style. They remained popular during the 19th century, now used for additional types of buildings such as museums, stock exchanges, legislature buildings, law courts, banks and town halls. Allegorical groups became typical on secular buildings. The pediment over the main entrance of the British Museum has The Progress of Civilisation by Sir Richard Westmacott, consisting of fifteen figures, installed in 1852, well after the main building. Westmacott's son sculpted the comparable pediment of the Royal Exchange, London;[2] like the later New York Stock Exchange Building (1903), this featured an allegory of commerce. The group on the Panthéon in Paris was changed three times over its first 50 years, varying between religious and patriotic subjects as the political wind changed.

By 1874, perhaps the most ambitious example in size and in the number of figures was that by Philippe Joseph Henri Lemaire for the La Madeleine Church in Paris.[24] It represents the Last Judgement, with Jesus Christ in the centre, and was completed between 1826 and 1834; it is 125 ft (38 m) in length, and 23 ft (7.0 m) tall at its apex.[25]

Group in polychrome terracotta, Philadelphia Museum of Art, sculptor C. Paul Jennewein, 1933

In the United States, many government buildings in Washington DC carry large groups, as well as numerous State Capitols and important courthouses. Drafting the Declaration of Independence on the Jefferson Memorial, by Adolph Alexander Weinman (1943) is an exception to the usual allegorical subject matter, showing the Committee of Five around a table.[26] Since World War II relatively few new groups have been created.

Architectural terracotta was sometimes used, as at the department store Harrods in London (glazed, by Royal Doulton), and (in polychrome) at the Philadelphia Museum of Art in the 1930s. The Victoria and Albert Museum has a mosaic group,[2] for which there are medieval Italian precedents.

Format

Gisela Richter, in The Sculpture and Sculptors of the Greeks, states that, "pediment groups presented peculiar difficulties. The chief requirements were: to place in the center a prominent figure or group, since here comes the chief accent; to fill the awkward space of the angles; and to compose figures for the intervening parts of constantly diminishing heights. And the composition as a whole had to produce the needed variety of line and create a harmonious effect. The gradual evolution from primitive renderings to the wonderful solutions of the Parthenon are fascinating to watch."[27]

The sculptures themselves may be freestanding, in-the-round statues that stand on the bed of the pediment, or they can be relief sculpture, attached to its back wall.[28] As an additional physical restriction in the pediment format, a deeper recess will throw the triangular field into deeper shadow, which means the figures should be executed in deeper relief or fully in the round.[29] Only the pediments from the temple of Aphaia at Aegina and the Parthenon compositions are fully finished in the round, other temples the back-side of the sculptures are summarily or roughly finished.[20] Some statues from the pediments of the temple of Zeus at Olympia are even hollowed out, to relieve weight.[30]

Pediment with acroterion

Aside from sculptural adornment of the tympanum, the triangular or sometimes curved area of a pediment, reclining figures were sometimes placed on the slanting sides above the pediment.[2] Alternatively, the apex, or the apex and both corners, may be topped with vertical elements called acroteria taking the form of urns, palmettes, or figural sculpture.[31][32]

Walter Copland Perry wrote that it was proof of the power of Greek art that the classical sculptors not only overcame the rigid restrictions of the pediment's shape, but turned them to their advantage.[29] Compositionally, the restrictions imposed by both the physical triangular shape of a pediment, and the traditional themes that are usually employed for the subject matter, are, according to Ernest Arthur Gardner, "as exactly regulated as that of a sonnet or a Spenserian stanza: the artist has liberty only in certain directions and must not violate the laws of rhythm."[33]

In all examples, classical and modern, the central area below the apex is inevitably the tallest, most spacious, the natural focus, and will contain the main figures and the focus of action. Secondary figures decrease in size and importance on both sides, as they approach the far angles at the base. The well-known classical examples all observe "unity of action", although the Greek geographer Pausanias describes a sculpture by Praxiteles in which Hercules appears several times in different sizes.[29]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Luebke, Wilhelm (1 January 1878). History of Sculpture from the Earliest Ages to the Present Time: Tr. by F.E. Bunnètt, Volume 2. Smith. p. 468. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  2. ^ a b c d e Speel, Bob. "Pediment sculpture". www.speel.me.uk. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  3. ^ Harris, Cyril M., editor, Illustrated Dictionary of Historic Architecture, Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1977 p. 405
  4. ^ Lawrence, 110. Lawrence seems somewhat dubious about this; the original text is lost: "A cryptic statement of Pindar's apparently claims it to have been a Corinthian invention..."
  5. ^ Lawrence, 110, 138
  6. ^ Lawrence, 111–112
  7. ^ Lawrence, 111, 138
  8. ^ Barron, John, An Introduction to Greek Sculpture, Schocken Books, New York, 1981 p.16
  9. ^ a b c Richter 1941, p. 119.
  10. ^ Vassilika, Eleni (1998). Greek and Roman Art in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-62557-2
  11. ^ Cristofani, Mauri, et al. "Etruscan.", 2 (v), Grove Art Online, Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. Web. 28 Apr. 2016. Subscription required
  12. ^ "Hall of Pediment", Musei Capitolini, Rome
  13. ^ Analysis of scholarly discussion as to the temple's sculptures (Bolletino Telematico dell'Arte, in Italian)
  14. ^ Relief of Marcus Aurelius sacrificing at the fourth Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus
  15. ^ Titi, Catharine (2023). The Parthenon Marbles and International Law. pp. 40–41. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26357-6. ISBN 978-3-031-26356-9. S2CID 258846977.
  16. ^ Short, Ernest Henry (1 January 1908). A History of Sculpture. E.P. Dutton. p. 248. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  17. ^ Schede, Martin (1 January 1923). The Acropolis of Athens. Schoetz & Parrhysius. p. 21. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  18. ^ Smith, Solomon Charles Kaines (1 January 1914). Greek Art and National Life. Charles Scribner's sons. p. 276. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  19. ^ Marvin, Miranda (1 January 2008). The Language of the Muses: The Dialogue Between Roman and Greek Sculpture. Getty Publications. p. 132. ISBN 9780892368068. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  20. ^ a b Peixoto, G. B. 2022. Classical Pedimental Compositions: the 5th-century Post-Parthenonian Pediments and their Meanings. MA diss. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.https://www.academia.edu/89686234/Classical_Pedimental_Compositions_the_5th_century_Post_Parthenonian_Pediments_and_their_Meanings
  21. ^ "Carrey drawings", Laurence Shafe
  22. ^ "The Parthenon Sculptures". The British Museum. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  23. ^ Courtauld Institute page
  24. ^ The Imperial Gazetteer: A General Dictionary of Geography, Physical, Political, Statistical, and Descriptive, with a Supplement Bringing the Geographical Information Down to the Latest Dates, Volume 2. Blackie. 1 January 1874. p. 583. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  25. ^ Shedd, Julia Ann Clark (1 January 1881). Famous Sculptors and Sculpture. J.R. Osgood. p. 267. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  26. ^ Drafting the Declaration of Independence, from SIRIS.
  27. ^ Richter, p. 118
  28. ^ Webb, Pamela A., Hellenistic Architectural Sculpture: Figural Motifs in Western Anatolia and the Aegean Islands, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 1996 pp. 23–25
  29. ^ a b c Perry, Walter Copland (1 January 1882). Greek and Roman Sculpture: A Popular Introduction to the History of Greek and Roman Sculpture. Longmans, Green. pp. 213–214. Retrieved 8 September 2021.
  30. ^ Peixoto, G. B. 2022. Classical Pedimental Compositions: the 5th-century Post-Parthenonian Pediments and their Meanings. MA diss. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. p. 10-16. https://www.academia.edu/89686234/Classical_Pedimental_Compositions_the_5th_century_Post_Parthenonian_Pediments_and_their_Meanings
  31. ^ Harris, Cyril M. (1983). Illustrated Dictionary of Historic Architecture. Courier Corporation. p. 5. ISBN 9780486244440.
  32. ^ "acroterion - architecture".
  33. ^ Price, Matlack, "The Problem of the Pediment," The Architectural Forum, July 1925, Volume XLIII, Number 1, pp. 1.

References

  • Lawrence, A. W., Greek Architecture, 1957, Penguin, Pelican history of art
  • Richter, Gisela, M.A., The Sculpture and Sculptors of the Greeks, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1929 Second Edition 1941
This page was last edited on 18 March 2024, at 00:21
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.