To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Northern Securities Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A big gun in danger (1902)

The Northern Securities Company was a short-lived American railroad trust formed in 1901 by E. H. Harriman, James J. Hill, J.P. Morgan and their associates. The company controlled the Northern Pacific Railway; Great Northern Railway; Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad; and other associated lines. It was capitalized at $400 million, and Hill served as president.

The company was sued in 1902 under the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 by the Justice Department under President Theodore Roosevelt, one of the first antitrust cases filed against corporate interests instead of labor. The government won its case, and the company was dissolved, so that the three railroads again operated independently.[1]

Hill was the president of the Great Northern Railway and Harriman controlled the Union Pacific Railroad, two of the largest railroads in the U.S. Both sought control of the Burlington to connect their roads to the vital railroad hub of Chicago, Illinois. Hill, who also had a minority interest in the Northern Pacific Railway, outbid Harriman for the Burlington, by agreeing to Burlington President Charles Elliott Perkins's $200-a-share price.

Together, the Great Northern and the Northern Pacific assumed control of nearly 100 percent of the Burlington's outstanding stock. Knowing that the Northern Pacific controlled almost 49.3 percent of the Burlington's stock, Harriman launched a stock raid against the Northern Pacific. Control of the Northern Pacific would allow him to appoint directors to the Burlington, which could then be forced to treat Harriman's Union Pacific favorably in business matters. Harriman's stock raid in May 1901 led to the "Northern Pacific Corner". Speculators had sold shares that they did not own, and were now desperate to purchase shares at any price-some shares reportedly sold at $1,000. Hill, working with J.P. Morgan, took majority control of the Northern Pacific despite Harriman's best efforts.

This speculation resonated throughout the stock market and the country as a whole. The two men, their backers, and associates agreed to settle their differences and eliminate ruinous competition through a monopolistic combination. The Northern Securities Company was formed by Hill to control the stock of his major railroad properties. Some of Harriman's directors were appointed as representatives for his holdings of Northern Pacific shares.

A public outcry over the new company made its way throughout the country, and both state and federal officials prepared to file litigation. On February 19, 1902, the United States Department of Justice announced plans to file a suit against the company. When approached by J. P. Morgan to settle the issue in private, President Roosevelt refused; he later remarked, "Mr. Morgan could not help regarding me as a big rival operator who either intended to ruin all his interests or could be induced to come to an agreement to ruin none." Although Roosevelt still believed that trusts were not always bad for society, he could not bear to feel treated as just another rival operator. The suit continued.[2]

The Justice Department won the suit and the company was dissolved according to the 1904 Supreme Court ruling in Northern Securities Co. v. United States case, decided five to four. The companies were convicted under the Sherman Antitrust Act. In the following seven years, 44 other Federal antitrust cases turned out rulings similar to the Northern Securities case. Included in these break-ups were Harriman's own holdings of the Union Pacific and Southern Pacific railroads.

The Northern Securities case was one of the earliest antitrust cases and provided important legal precedents for many later cases, including that against Major League Baseball.

In 1955, the Northern Pacific and Great Northern renewed talks of merging. The Supreme Court approved the merger, and as a result, the Great Northern, Northern Pacific, Chicago Burlington & Quincy, and the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway merged on March 2, 1970, to form the Burlington Northern Railroad.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    4 450
    367
    352
  • History Brief: The Trustbuster President
  • The New Geography of Investing® and a New Breed of Global Company
  • Shundrawn Thomas, CEO | Northern Trust Securities, Chicago

Transcription

The Trustbuster President Theodore Roosevelt would change the office of the presidency forever, creating a model by which all future presidents would be judged. He acted boldly in attacking the problems the nation faced, using his personality and popularity to advance his political agenda. Roosevelt believed that the US government should be used as a tool to be implemented whenever individual states proved incapable of dealing with social and economic problems. As president, Roosevelt believed he was a "steward of the people". He argued that, as president, he had the "legal right to do whatever the needs of the people demand, unless the Constitution or the laws explicitly forbid... it." Roosevelt used the office as a "bully pulpit", influencing the media and shaping federal and state legislation. As president, he introduced the Square Deal, a domestic program which included three basic ideas: conservation of natural resources, control of large corporations, and protecting the American consumer. Roosevelt hoped to help middle class citizens, weaken the plutocracy (wealthy ruling class), and break up "bad trusts" without greatly damaging the American economy. Roosevelt firmly believed in government action to mitigate social evils, publicly denouncing those whom he believed were "the representatives of predatory wealth". Much of the action Roosevelt took came in a series of lawsuits his administration filed against "bad trusts". Trusts were legal bodies that had been created to hold stocks in a large variety of companies. By 1900, almost 4/5s of American industries were controlled by trusts, in effect, creating large monopolies. Many of them, such as Standard Oil, had become wildly unpopular with the American public because of harsh business practices and unfair tactics. In 1890, Congress had attempted to limit the power of trusts by passing the Sherman-Antitrust Law. However, the language of the bill made enforcement of the act highly ineffective. Prior to 1900, most of the lawsuits filed against powerful trusts and corporations had failed. As president, Roosevelt hoped to destroy the trusts which he felt exploited the American public. A series of lawsuits were filed by the Roosevelt Administration against these "bad trusts". The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against J.P. Morgan's Northern Securities Company in 1902 for creating a monopoly over railroads in the American Northwest. As a result, the Supreme Court, by a narrow 5-4 decision, dissolved the company in 1904. During his presidency, Theodore Roosevelt would use the power of his office to file 43 similar lawsuits in an effort to break up other trusts. While Roosevelt won many of these cases, the mergers of large businesses into even larger ones would continue.

References

  1. ^ Lawrence Meir Friedman (2004). American Law in the 20th Century. Yale UP. p. 56. ISBN 978-0300102994.
  2. ^ Nomi Prins (2014). All the Presidents' Bankers: The Hidden Alliances that Drive American Power. Nation Books. p. 6. ISBN 9781568587493.

Further reading

  • Brown, R. Blake, and Bruce A. Kimball. "When Holmes Borrowed from Langdell: The" Ultra Legal" Formalism and Public Policy of Northern Securities (1904)." The American Journal of Legal History (2001): 278-321. in JSTOR
  • Bryant, Keith L., Jr., Editor. Encyclopedia of American Business History and Biography, Railroads in the Twentieth Century. New York: Facts on File, 1990.
  • Frey, Robert L., Editor. Encyclopedia of American Business History and Biography, Railroads in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Facts on File, 1988.
  • Haeg, Larry. Harriman vs. Hill: Wall Street's Great Railroad War (2013)
  • Hidy, Ralph W., et al. The Great Northern Railway, A History. (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1988)
  • Klein, Maury. The Life and Legend of E.H. Harriman. (U of North Carolina Press, 2000) online
  • Martin, Albro. James J. Hill and the Opening of the Northwest. (Oxford University Press, 1976)
  • Meyer, Balthasar Henry (1906). Bulletin of the University of Wisconsin, No. 142: History of the Northern Securities Case. Madison: University of Wisconsin. (other link).
  • Prager, Robin A. "The effects of horizontal mergers on competition: The case of the Northern Securities Company." The RAND Journal of Economics (1992): 123–133.
  • Randolph, Carman F. "Considerations on the State Corporation in Federal and Interstate Relations. The Northern Securities Cases." Columbia Law Review 3.3 (1903): 168–197. in JSTOR
  • Stigler, George J. "Monopoly and oligopoly by merger." American Economic Review (1950): 23–34. in JSTOR
  • Strouse, Jean. Morgan: American Financier (1999) pp 418–34.

Primary sources

  • The Northern Securities Decision [1] Northern Securities Co. v. United States at Cornell Law School's Supreme Court Collection.
This page was last edited on 15 September 2022, at 03:50
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.