To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Navalnyy v. Russia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Navalnyy v Russia
CourtEuropean Court of Human Rights
Citation(s)[2018] ECHR 1062, (2018) 29580/12, (2019) 68 EHRR 25
Keywords
Freedom of association, liberty and the right to a fair trial

Navalnyy v Russia [2018] ECHR 1062 is a human rights law case, concerning freedom of association, liberty and the right to a fair trial.[1] It centered around Alexei Navalny, a Russian opposition activist.[2]

Facts

Alexei Navalny, an activist against corruption and a blogger, was arrested seven times between 2012 and 2014 for a rally, three 'walkabout' gatherings, two demonstrations, and a courthouse gathering, and held liable for administrative offences, or disobeying police orders. The Code of Administrative Offences art 20(2) made it an offence to breach procedures for conduct of public gatherings. He was fined and got short custodial sentences. He argued this breached the European Convention on Human Rights articles 5, 6, 11 and 18. He argued the Russian authorities had an ulterior purpose of stopping his political engagement and influence.

Judgment

The European Court of Human Rights held[full citation needed] there were breaches of articles 5, 6 and 11. The Russian courts acted unfairly by basing their judgments only on police accounts, and in all seven cases there was a breach of the right to assembly. Article 18 was breached because there was a pattern of arrest, on progressively more implausible grounds. Response was increasingly severe. It was aimed to suppress political pluralism, which formed part of 'effective political democracy' governed by 'the rule of law'.

See also

References

  1. ^ Nussberger, Angelika (14 May 2020). "The European Court of Human Rights at Sixty – Challenges and Perspectives". The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review. 1 (1): 11–13. doi:10.1163/26663236-00101006. ISSN 2666-3228. S2CID 219771785.
  2. ^ Heri, Corina (25 April 2019). "Navalnyy v. Russia (Eur. Ct. H.R.)". International Legal Materials. 58 (2): 315–370. doi:10.1017/ilm.2019.15. ISSN 0020-7829. S2CID 186483279.

External links

This page was last edited on 28 June 2023, at 08:34
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.