To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

List of United States administrative law cases

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    401
    7 668
    33 963
  • The Courts and the Administrative State
  • Albuquerque Police Academy Firearms Training APD Class 110
  • Albuquerque Police Academy Firearms Training Day 29 DPS 15.1

Transcription

Legality of Statutory Schemes

Appropriate Deference to Agency

  • Skidmore v. Swift & Co. (1944) - deference to agency "rules" and interpretations not intended by Congress to carry the "force of law."
  • Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB (1951) - Court must consider ALJ's contrary ruling when reviewing agency ruling.
  • Richardson v. Perales (1971) - agency may rely on hearsay evidence over non-hearsay evidence and still meet the "substantial evidence" requirement for proving a fact.
  • Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe (1971) - Important case applying the "arbitrary and capricious" review to rule-making.
  • Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Association v. State Farm (1983) - "arbitrary and capricious" to change rule without considering other options for the change.
  • Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984) - What level of deference should an agency's interpretation of its own statute receive in areas where such interpretations were intended by Congress to have the "force of law"?
  • Block v. Community Nutrition Institute (1984) - presumption of court reviewability overcome when statutory scheme indicates no congressional intent to create a private right.[1]
  • Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians (1986) - Statutory presumption of reviewability not overcome.[2]
  • Webster v. Doe (1988) - may not review agency action where "no law to apply."
  • Martin v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (1991) - When adjudication and rule-making power is split between two agencies, court should defer to rule-making agency's interpretations.
  • Auer v. Robbins (1997) - How much deference should an agency interpretation of its own regulations get?
  • United States v. Mead Corp. (2001) - What level of deference should an agency's interpretation receive when not intended to have the "force of law"? How to decide if Congress intended to have the "force of law"?
  • Norton v. S. Utah Wilderness Alliance (2004) - Under APA, court can only force the agency to act when it has failed to act when the required act is non-discretionary in nature.

Limits on Agency Power

Statutory Interpretation

The Administrative Procedure Act (APA)

Procedural Due Process

Limits on Power to Make Policy Through Adjudication

  • SEC v. Chenery Corp. (1947) - Impermissible creation of retroactive "rules" through adjudication.
  • U.S. v. Storer Broadcasting Co. (1956) - agency can make regulations particularizing statute in order to bar some claims at the threshold.
  • NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co. (1969) - making "rules" through adjudication.
  • NLRB v. Bell-Aerospace Co. (1974) - can make "rules" through adjudication as long as not abuse of discretion.

See also

References

  1. ^ Block v. Community Nutrition Institute 467 U.S. 340, Findlaw.com, 1984, retrieved 2016-12-10.
  2. ^ Bowen v. Academy of Family Physicians 476 U.S. 667, Findlaw.com, 1986, retrieved 2016-12-10.
This page was last edited on 27 March 2023, at 10:05
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.