To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Kripke structure (model checking)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article describes Kripke structures as used in model checking. For a more general description, see Kripke semantics.

A Kripke structure is a variation of the transition system, originally proposed by Saul Kripke,[1] used in model checking[2] to represent the behavior of a system. It consists of a graph whose nodes represent the reachable states of the system and whose edges represent state transitions, together with a labelling function which maps each node to a set of properties that hold in the corresponding state. Temporal logics are traditionally interpreted in terms of Kripke structures.[citation needed]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    10 835
    1 318
    15 798
  • Mod-05 Lec-01 Introduction to Model Checking
  • Formula in Kripke Model
  • Modal logic 1.1 - system K - introduction

Transcription

Formal definition

Let AP be a set of atomic propositions, i.e. boolean-valued expressions formed from variables, constants and predicate symbols. Clarke et al.[3] define a Kripke structure over AP as a 4-tuple M = (S, I, R, L) consisting of

  • a finite set of states S.
  • a set of initial states IS.
  • a transition relation RS × S such that R is left-total, i.e., ∀s ∈ S ∃s' ∈ S such that (s,s') ∈ R.
  • a labeling (or interpretation) function L: S → 2AP.

Since R is left-total, it is always possible to construct an infinite path through the Kripke structure. A deadlock state can be modeled by a single outgoing edge back to itself. The labeling function L defines for each state sS the set L(s) of all atomic propositions that are valid in s.

A path of the structure M is a sequence of states ρ = s1, s2, s3, ... such that for each i > 0, R(si, si+1) holds. The word on the path ρ is the sequence of sets of the atomic propositions w = L(s1), L(s2), L(s3), ..., which is an ω-word over alphabet 2AP.

With this definition, a Kripke structure (say, having only one initial state iI) may be identified with a Moore machine with a singleton input alphabet, and with the output function being its labeling function.[4]

Example

An example of a Kripke structure

Let the set of atomic propositions AP = {p, q}. p and q can model arbitrary boolean properties of the system that the Kripke structure is modelling.

The figure at right illustrates a Kripke structure M = (S, I, R, L), where

  • S = {s1, s2, s3}.
  • I = {s1}.
  • R = {(s1, s2), (s2, s1) (s2, s3), (s3, s3)}.
  • L = {(s1, {p, q}), (s2, {q}), (s3, {p})}.

M may produce a path ρ = s1, s2, s1, s2, s3, s3, s3, ... and w = {p, q}, {q}, {p, q}, {q}, {p}, {p}, {p}, ... is the execution word over the path ρ. M can produce execution words belonging to the language ({p, q}{q})*({p})ω ∪ ({p, q}{q})ω.

Relation to other notions

Although this terminology is widespread in the model checking community, some textbooks on model checking do not define "Kripke structure" in this extended way (or at all in fact), but simply use the concept of a (labelled) transition system, which additionally has a set Act of actions, and the transition relation is defined as a subset of S × Act × S, which they additionally extend to include a set of atomic propositions and a labeling function for the states as well (L as defined above.) In this approach, the binary relation obtained by abstracting away the action labels is called a state graph.[5]

Clarke et al. redefine a Kripke structure as a set of transitions (instead of just one), which is equivalent to the labeled transitions above, when they define the semantics of modal μ-calculus.[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ Kripke, Saul, 1963, "Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic," Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16: 83-94
  2. ^ Clarke, Edmund M. (2008): The Birth of Model Checking. in: Grumberg, Orna and Veith, Helmut eds.: 25 Years of Model Checking, Vol. 5000: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 1-26.
  3. ^ Clarke, Edmund M. Jr; Grumberg, Orna; Peled, Doron (December 1999). Model Checking. Cyber Physical Systems Series. MIT Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-262-03270-4.
  4. ^ Klaus Schneider (2004). Verification of reactive systems: formal methods and algorithms. Springer. p. 45. ISBN 978-3-540-00296-3.
  5. ^ Christel Baier; Joost-Pieter Katoen (2008). Principles of model checking. The MIT Press. pp. 20–21 and 94–95. ISBN 978-0-262-02649-9.
  6. ^ Clarke et al. p. 98
This page was last edited on 4 February 2024, at 23:07
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.