To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kets
кето, кет, денг
Kets
Total population
c. 1,100
Regions with significant populations
Krasnoyarsk Krai (Russia)
 Russia1,088 (2021)[1]
 Ukraine37 (2001)[2]
Languages
Ket, Russian
Religion
Russian Orthodoxy, Animism, Shamanism
Related ethnic groups
Yughs
Location of Ket people
Shown within Russia
LocationMost Ket live on the middle Yenisei River and tributaries, including a group in the community of Kellog.
Coordinates62°29′N 86°16′E / 62.483°N 86.267°E / 62.483; 86.267

Kets (Russian: кеты; Ket: кето, кет, денг) are a Yeniseian-speaking people in Siberia. During the Russian Empire, they were known as Ostyaks, without differentiating them from several other Siberian people. Later, they became known as Yenisei Ostyaks because they lived in the middle and lower basin of the Yenisei River in the Krasnoyarsk Krai district of Russia.[3] The modern Kets lived along the eastern middle stretch of the river before being assimilated politically into Russia between the 17th and 19th centuries. According to the 2010 census, there were 1,220 Kets in Russia.[1] According to the 2021 census, this number had declined to 1,088.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    69 506
    21 259
    31 207
    305 307
    6 491
  • The Ket People
  • KET LANGUAGE, PEOPLE, & CULTURE
  • The Ket People
  • What on Earth Happened to the Siberians
  • The Languages in Russia 2: The Ket Language - Navajo's Siberian Cousin?

Transcription

The native Ket people are so isolated, they live in an area of Siberia, central part of Siberia which is not near any large cities, not near any famous landmarks and not near any major natural resources, except for the fish in the river Yenisei and the timber that is still in the forests uncut. They are so isolated and so few in number, there are only about 1,200 of them, that even most Russians don’t know they exist. So you might expect that there isn’t any practical reason to study this group of people, who in fact now are losing their language, losing their culture, they’re becoming assimilated to Russian language and culture. But that is not to the case, there are some very important reasons to study Ket people. They are the last hunter-gatherer people of the interior of Asia and in that sense they’re a window back to the ancient life before the rise of steppe nomadism and pastoralism in central Eurasia. They show how people lived in Northern and Central Asia maybe during the late Ice Age and the early Holocene during the period of time when tribes presumably were moving from North Asia into what is going to be labeled North America. The Ket are really the closest group of people who have the same type of culture that was brought into native North America. So, culturally, historically, I think that they unite the continents, in a sense. There’s also some possibility that the Ket language, which is an isolate - not related to any other languages around it – has a distant genetic affiliation with the Athabascan languages of North America. So studying the Ket language might provide a link between Native North Asians and Native Americans. This is something that I’m working on as well. Also because the Ket language is so different from all of the other languages of Eurasia, Ket verb has prefixes and all the verbs in Turkic, Mongolian, the other, the Finnic and Samoyedic languages of the area all have suffixes. Because the Ket language is so different in its structure, it has had to take on radically different influences than its own original structure and it has changed and adapted itself in ways that no other language in the world has done. So there are some features of the Ket language that are almost unique or perhaps unique typologically. One of them is an interesting tone system that is closest to Vietnamese of any tone system that I’ve ever encountered. Another is the verb structure which originally was prefixing but then the root was put at the beginning in some new types of verbs that made it look like suffixing Turkic verbs because of the influence around it. So, these features make Ket very unusual, and it’s as if Ket is a Native American language that was left in North Asia and had to adapt to radically different languages around it. So studying this, you know, historical and in a synchronic perspective, allows us to make some generalizations about how languages can change through time and what are the limitations or the possibilities of their structural diversity. So studying Ket, it allows one to understand linguistics both historically as well as in terms of how languages exist today. And also studying such a native, small group that is disappearing that maybe has, holds the key to understanding an ancient prehistory, or even movements between continents, underscores the importance of paying attention to all the native groups of people around the world because each of them has something to contribute to our understanding of the human story. And I think Ket is more of a vivid example of the value of that knowledge than many other because it is so radically different. Ket is like Basque in Europe. It is so different from all the other peoples and languages around it, it’s almost an accident that it survived. So I feel rather privileged to be really the only North American who is seriously studying this language because I feel that it is a real gem, a treasure trove of research possibilities. And I look forward to going back and working with my informants again and then learning more about the language before it dies out. It will probably die out in a generation as a form of speech that’s used in everyday communication.

Origin

The Ket people share their origin with other Yeniseian people and are closely related to other Indigenous people of Siberia and Indigenous peoples of the Americas. They belong mostly to Y-DNA haplogroup Q-M242.[4]

According to a 2016 study, the Ket and other Yeniseian people originated likely somewhere near the Altai Mountains or near Lake Baikal. It is suggested that parts of the Altaians are predominantly of Yeniseian origin and closely related to the Ket people. The Ket people are also closely related to several Native American groups. According to this study, the Yeniseians are linked to the Paleo-Eskimo groups. [5]

History

The Kets are thought to be the only survivors of an ancient nomadic people believed to have originally inhabited central and southern Siberia. In the 1960s, the Yugh people were distinguished as a separate, though similar, group.

Today, Kets are the descendants of fishermen and hunter tribes of the Yenisei taiga, who adopted some of the cultural ways of those original Ket-speaking tribes of South Siberia. The earlier tribes engaged in hunting, fishing, and reindeer breeding in the northern areas.[1]

The Ket was incorporated into the Russian state in the 17th century. Their efforts to resist were unsuccessful as the Russians deported them to different places in an attempt to break up their resistance. This broke up their strictly organized patriarchal social system and their way of life disintegrated. The Ket people ran up debts with the Russians. Some died of famine, others of diseases introduced from Europe. By the 19th century, the Ket could no longer sustain itself without food assistance from the Russian state.[6]

In the 20th century, the Soviets conducted collectivization among the Ket. They were officially recognized as Kets in the 1930s when the Soviet Union began to implement the self-definition policy for indigenous peoples. However, many Ket traditions continued to be counteracted by the state. Collectivization was completed by the 1950s, and the Ket people were led to adopt the same lifestyle as ethnic Russians; education in Russian contributed to language loss as well.

The population of Kets has been relatively stable since 1923. According to the 2010 census, there were 1,220 Kets in Russia. The Kets live in small villages along riversides and are no longer nomadic.

Language

The Ket language has been linked to the Na-Dené languages of North America in the Dené–Yeniseian language family.[7][8][9] This link has led to some collaboration between the Ket and northern Athabaskan peoples.[10] Although a potential link to the Na-Dené languages has been identified, this link is not accepted by all linguists.[11]

Ket means "man" (plural deng "men, people"). The Kets of the Kas, Sym and Dubches rivers use jugun as a self-designation. In 1788, Peter Simon Pallas was the earliest scholar to publish observations about the Ket language in a travel diary.[12]

In 1926, there were 1,428 Kets, of whom 1,225 (85.8%) were native speakers of the Ket language. The 1989 census counted 1,113 ethnic Kets with only 537 (48.3%) native speakers left.[citation needed]

As of 2008, there were only about 100 people who still spoke Ket fluently, half of them over 50.[7] It is entirely different from any other language in Siberia.[1] Alexander Kotusov (1955–2019) was a Ket folk singer, composer, and writer of songs in the Ket language.[13]

Culture

The Kets have a rich and varied culture, filled with an abundance of Siberian mythology, including shamanistic practices and oral traditions. Siberia, the area of Russia in which the Kets reside, has long been identified as the originating place of the Shaman or Shamanism. In the 1950s, Mircea Eliade states this in the first sentence of his book Shamanism: "Since the beginning of the 20th century, ethnologists have fallen into the habit of using the terms 'shaman', 'medicine man', 'sorcerer', and 'magician' interchangeably to designate certain individuals possessing magico-religious powers and found in all 'primitive' societies. If the word 'shaman' is taken to mean any magician, sorcerer, medicine man, or ecstatic found throughout the history of religion and religious ethnology, we arrive at a notion at once extremely complex and extremely vague; it seems, furthermore, to serve no purpose, for we already have the terms 'magician' or 'sorcerer' to express notions as unlike and ill-defined as 'primitive magic' or 'primitive mysticism'."[14]

The shamans of the Ket people have been identified as practitioners of healing as well as other local ritualistic spiritual practices. Supposedly, there were several types of Ket shamans,[15][16] differing in function (sacral rites, curing), power, and associated animals (deer, bear).[16] Also, among Kets, (as with several other Siberian peoples such as the Karagas[17][18][19]) there are examples of the use of skeleton symbolics.[20] Hoppál interprets it as a symbol of shamanic rebirth,[21] although it may also symbolize the bones of the loon (the helper animal of the shaman, joining the air and underwater worlds, just like the story of the shaman who traveled both to the sky and the underworld).[22] The skeleton-like overlay represented shamanic rebirth among some other Siberian cultures as well.[23][20]

Today, the practice of shamanism has largely been abandoned. Monotheism has displaced the ideas of the shaman and shamanistic practices. Of great importance to Kets are spirit images, described as "an animal shoulder bone wrapped in a scrap of cloth simulating clothing."[24] One adult Ket, who had been careless with a cigarette, said, "It's a shame I don't have my doll. My house burnt down together with my dolls."[25] Kets regard their spirit images as household deities, which sleep in the daytime and protect them at night.[26]

Edward J. Vajda, a professor of Modern and Classical languages, spent a year in Siberia studying the Ket people, and found a relationship between the Ket language and the Na-Dene languages, of which Navajo is the most prominent and widely spoken.[27]

Vyacheslav Ivanov and Vladimir Toporov compared Ket mythology with those of speakers of Uralic languages, assuming in the studies that they are modeling semiotic systems in the compared mythologies. They have also made typological comparisons.[28][29] Among other comparisons, possibly from Uralic mythological analogies, the mythologies of Ob-Ugric peoples[30] and Samoyedic peoples[31] are mentioned. Other authors have discussed analogies (similar folklore motifs, purely typological considerations, and certain binary pairs in symbolics) may be related to a dualistic organization of society - some dualistic features can be found in comparisons with these peoples.[32] However, for Kets, neither dualistic organization of society[33] nor cosmological dualism[34] have been researched thoroughly. If such features existed at all, they have either weakened or remained largely undiscovered.[33] There are some reports of a division into two exogamous patrilinear moieties,[35] folklore on conflicts of mythological figures, and cooperation of two beings in the creation of the land,[34] the motif of the earth-diver.[36] This motif is present in several cultures in different variants. In one example, the creator of the world is helped by a waterfowl as the bird dives under the water and fetches earth so that the creator can make land out of it. In some cultures, the creator and the earth-fetching being (sometimes called a devil, or taking the shape of a loon) compete with one another; in other cultures (including the Ket variant), they do not compete at all, but rather collaborate.[37]

However, if dualistic cosmologies are defined in a broad sense, and not restricted to certain concrete motifs, then their existence is more widespread; they exist not only among some Uralic-speaking peoples, but in examples on every inhabited continent. [clarification needed] [38]

The Ket traditional culture has been researched extensively. Some people included as reference are Matthias Castrén, Vasiliy Ivanovich Anuchin, Kai Donner, Hans Findeisen, and Yevgeniya Alekseyevna Alekseyenko.[39]

1913 photographs by the Norwegian explorer Fridtjof Nansen:

Notable Kets

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Vajda, Edward G. "The Ket and Other Yeniseian Peoples". Archived from the original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 29 June 2007.
  2. ^ Ukrcensus.gov.uaArchived 2018-11-04 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ "Ket: Bibliographical guide". Institute of Linguistics (Russian Academy of Sciences) & Kazuto Matsumura (Univ. of Tokyo). Retrieved 20 October 2006.
  4. ^ Karafet, TM; Osipova, LP; Gubina, MA; Posukh, OL; Zegura, SL; Hammer, MF (2002). "High Levels of Y-Chromosome Differentiation among Native Siberian Populations and the Genetic Signature of a Boreal Hunter-Gatherer Way of Life". Hum Biol. 74 (6): 761–89. doi:10.1353/hub.2003.0006. PMID 12617488. S2CID 9443804.
  5. ^ Flegontov, Pavel; Changmai, Piya; Zidkova, Anastassiya; Logacheva, Maria D.; Flegontova, Olga; Gelfand, Mikhail S.; Gerasimov, Evgeny S.; Khrameeva, Ekaterina E.; Konovalova, Olga P.; Neretina, Tatiana; Nikolsky, Yuri V.; Starostin, George; Stepanova, Vita V.; Travinsky, Igor V.; Tříska, Martin; Tříska, Petr; Tatarinova, Tatiana V.; Tatarinova, Tatiana V. (2015). "Genomic study of the Ket: A Paleo-Eskimo-related ethnic group with significant ancient North Eurasian ancestry". Scientific Reports. 6: 20768. arXiv:1508.03097. Bibcode:2016NatSR...620768F. doi:10.1038/srep20768. PMC 4750364. PMID 26865217.
  6. ^ "THE KETS". The Peoples of the Red Book. Retrieved 5 August 2006.
  7. ^ a b "Ket language family linked to Na-Dene language family | orbis quintus". 10 March 2008. Archived from the original on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 22 June 2016.
  8. ^ "Public Lecture: The Siberian Origin of the Na-Dene Languages". University of Alaska Fairbanks. 12 February 2008. Archived from the original on 28 May 2009. Retrieved 22 June 2016.
  9. ^ "Dene-Yeniseic Symposium, February 2008". University of Alaska Fairbanks. 10 February 2008. Archived from the original on 26 May 2009. Retrieved 22 June 2016.
  10. ^ "The Arctic Athabaskan Council and the Ket People of Siberian Russia Renew Historic Contacts and Agree to Work Together | Talking Alaska". talkingalaska.blogspot.com. 21 April 2010. Retrieved 22 June 2016.
  11. ^ "Ket, Its Viability and Revival Prospects" (PDF). Kevin Andrusky. 9 December 2013. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  12. ^ "Ket language". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 7 April 2021.
  13. ^ Siberian Lang – Alexander Maksimovich Kotusov
  14. ^ Mircea Eliade, Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972) 5
  15. ^ Alekseyenko 1978
  16. ^ a b Hoppál 2005: 171
  17. ^ Diószegi 1960: 128, 188, 243
  18. ^ Diószegi 1960: 130
  19. ^ Hoppál 1994: 75
  20. ^ a b Hoppál 2005: 172
  21. ^ Hoppál 1994: 65
  22. ^ Hoppál 2005: 198
  23. ^ Hoppál 2005: 199
  24. ^ A. A. Malygna, Dolls of the Peoples of Siberia 1988, p. 132, cited in Edward J. Vajda, Yeniseian Peoples and Languages: A History of Yeniseian Studies with an annotated bibliography and a source guide, Curzon Press, 2001.
  25. ^ Werner Herzog, Happy People: A Year in the Taiga (documentary film) 2010.
  26. ^ Herzog
  27. ^ University, Western Washington (9 March 2021). "How 30 years of research built a language bridge between the peoples of Siberia and North America". Medium. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  28. ^ Ivanov & Toporov 1973
  29. ^ Ivanov 1984:390, in editorial afterword by Hoppál
  30. ^ Ivanov 1984: 225, 227, 229
  31. ^ Ivanov 1984: 229, 230
  32. ^ Ivanov 1984: 229–231
  33. ^ a b Zolotaryov 1980: 39
  34. ^ a b Zolotaryov 1980: 48
  35. ^ Zolotaryov 1980: 37
  36. ^ Ivanov 1984: 229
  37. ^ Paulson 1975 :295
  38. ^ Zolotarjov 1980: 56
  39. ^ Hoppál 2005: 170–171

Further reading

  • Alekseyenko, E. A. (1978). "Categories of Ket Shamans". In Diószegi, Vilmos; Hoppál, Mihály (eds.). Shamanism in Siberia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
  • Diószegi, Vilmos (1960). Sámánok nyomában Szibéria földjén. Egy néprajzi kutatóút története. Terebess Ázsia E-Tár (in Hungarian). Budapest: Magvető Könyvkiadó. The book has been translated to English: Diószegi, Vilmos (1968). Tracing shamans in Siberia. The story of an ethnographical research expedition. Translated from Hungarian by Anita Rajkay Babó. Oosterhout: Anthropological Publications.
  • Hoppál, Mihály (1994). Sámánok, lelkek és jelképek (in Hungarian). Budapest: Helikon Kiadó. ISBN 963-208-298-2. The title means "Shamans, souls and symbols".
  • Hoppál, Mihály (2005). Sámánok Eurázsiában (in Hungarian). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. ISBN 963-05-8295-3. The title means "Shamans in Eurasia", the book is written in Hungarian, but it is published also in German, Estonian and Finnish. Site of publisher with a short description on the book (in Hungarian) Archived 2 January 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  • Ivanov, Vyacheslav; Vladimir Toporov (1973). "Towards the Description of Ket Semiotic Systems". Semiotica. IX (4). The Hague • Prague • New York: Mouton: 318–346.
  • Ivanov, Vjacseszlav (=Vyacheslav) (1984). "Nyelvek és mitológiák". Nyelv, mítosz, kultúra (in Hungarian). Collected, appendix, editorial afterword by Hoppál, Mihály. Budapest: Gondolat. ISBN 963-281-186-0. The title means: "Language, myth, culture", the editorial afterword means: "Languages and mythologies".
  • Ivanov, Vjacseszlav (=Vyacheslav) (1984). "Obi-ugor és ket folklórkapcsolatok". Nyelv, mítosz, kultúra (in Hungarian). Collected, appendix, editorial afterword by Hoppál, Mihály. Budapest: Gondolat. pp. 215–233. ISBN 963-281-186-0. The title means: "Language, myth, culture", the chapter means: "Obi-Ugric and Ket folklore contacts".
  • Middendorff, A. Th., von (1987). Reis Taimхrile. Tallinn.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Paulson, Ivar (1975). "A világkép és a természet az észak-szibériai népek vallásában". In Gulya, János (ed.). A vízimadarak népe. Tanulmányok a finnugor rokon népek élete és műveltsége köréből (in Hungarian). Budapest: Európa Könyvkiadó. pp. 283–298. ISBN 963-07-0414-5. Chapter means: "The world view and the nature in the religion of the North-Siberian peoples"; title means: "The people of water fowls. Studies on lifes and cultures of the Finno-Ugric relative peoples".
  • Zolotarjov, A.M. (1980). "Társadalomszervezet és dualisztikus teremtésmítoszok Szibériában". In Hoppál, Mihály (ed.). A Tejút fiai. Tanulmányok a finnugor népek hitvilágáról (in Hungarian). Budapest: Európa Könyvkiadó. pp. 29–58. ISBN 963-07-2187-2. Chapter means: "Social structure and dualistic creation myths in Siberia"; title means: "The sons of Milky Way. Studies on the belief systems of Finno-Ugric peoples".

External links

Media related to Ket people at Wikimedia Commons

This page was last edited on 28 May 2024, at 08:50
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.