To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Junk food news

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Junk food news is a sardonic term for news stories that deliver "sensationalized, personalized, and homogenized inconsequential trivia",[1] especially when such stories appear at the expense of serious investigative journalism. It implies a criticism of the mass media for disseminating news that, while not very nourishing, is "cheap to produce and profitable for media proprietors."[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    1 490 537
    323 579
    473 642
    136 303
    5 571 147
  • Obesity and corporate greed | DW Documentary
  • What Happens to Your Body When You Only Eat Junk Food Every Day
  • Why is junk food unhealthy? - Ask Coley - Health Tips for Kids | Educational Videos by Mocomi
  • Teenager blinded by chips and junk food diet: BBC News Review
  • How the food you eat affects your gut - Shilpa Ravella

Transcription

Meaning

The term junk food news was first used in print by Carl Jensen in the March 1983 edition of Penthouse. As the leader of Project Censored, he had frequently faulted the media for ignoring important stories. In response, says Jensen, editors claimed that other stories were more important, and bolstered this claim with ad hominem comments directed against him.

...news editors and directors...argued that the real issue isn't censorship—but rather a difference of opinion as to what information is important to publish or broadcast. Editors often point out that there is a finite amount of time and space for news delivery—about 23 minutes for a half-hour network television evening news program—and that it's their responsibility to determine which stories are most critical for the public to hear. The critics said I wasn't exploring media censorship but rather I was just another frustrated academic criticizing editorial news judgment.[1]

To give this argument a fair hearing, Jensen decided to conduct a review to determine which stories the media had considered more important. But instead of hard-hitting investigative journalism, what he discovered was the phenomenon that he termed junk food news fell into predictable categories:[1]

As the flip side to its annual list of the Top 25 Censored Stories, Project Censored publishes an annual list of the Top 10 Junk Food News stories, compiled by members of the National Organization of News Ombudsmen.

See also

  • Fake news – False or misleading information presented as real
  • Hot take, also known as Pundit debate and analysis of sports and political news – Immediate opinionated commentary on news events
  • Media circus, also known as Media hype – Phrase describing excessive media coverage
  • Media culture – Norms, behaviors and artifacts of Western society as shaped by 20th-century mass communications
  • Sensationalism – Type of editorial tactic used in mass media
  • Soft media, also known as soft news – Organizations focused on producing infotainment

References

  1. ^ a b c d Jensen, Carl (2001). "Junk Food News 1877-2000". In Phillips, Peter (ed.). Censored 2001. Seven Stories Press. pp. 251–264. ISBN 978-1-58322-064-1.
This page was last edited on 19 February 2024, at 01:47
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.