To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

International Organization for Biological Control

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control (IOBC), is an organization, affiliated with the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS), organised to promote and study biological pest control, integrated pest management (IPM) and integrated production.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    1 542 333
    3 759 960
    51 283
    1 158 597
    438 720
  • The Nervous System - CrashCourse Biology #26
  • DNA Structure and Replication: Crash Course Biology #10
  • 2017 Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate: De-Extinction
  • The wacky history of cell theory - Lauren Royal-Woods
  • Why humans run the world | Yuval Noah Harari

Transcription

I'm going to be totally honest with you: I don't really spend a lot of time thinking about my bodily functions. For the most part. Maybe sometimes. But in the next few episodes, I'm going to be talking about all of the organ systems that make our lives possible, even occasionally pleasant! And to start it all off, I'm going straight to mission control: the Nervous System! Pretty much every animal, except for some really simple ones, have nervous systems, which is great, because it's what lets things do things like: have behaviors. It makes you the sentient, living thing that you are. The whole set-up here: your brain, your nerves, your spinal cord, everything is made up of specialized cells that you don't find anywhere else in the body. Most of those are neurons, which, you've seen them before, they look kind of like a tree with roots, a trunk and branches. Neurons bundle together to form nerves, pathways that transmit electrochemical signals from one part of your body to another. So, when you bite into a piece of pizza- I love it when there's pizza in the video... The receptor neurons in my taste buds recognize I'm eating something salty and fatty and awesome. And they carry that information along a nerve pathway to my brain. And then my brain can be like "Yeah! Pizza!" and then it can respond by sending back information through different nerve pathways that say: "You should eat more of that pizza!" And despite what my brain is telling me, I'm going to try to not eat any more of that pizza. You wouldn't think that it's terribly complicated to know that pizza tastes good and to tell someone to eat more pizza. But it turns out that our brains and our nervous systems are crazy complicated. Your nervous system basically has a big old bureaucracy of neurons, and it's divided into two main departments: the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system. Central and peripheral. The central nervous system, basically your brain and your spinal cord, is responsible for analyzing and interpreting all those data that your peripheral nervous system, all of the nerves outside of your brain and spine, collects and sends its way. Once the central nervous system makes a decision about data, it sends a signal back through to the peripheral nervous system saying "Do THIS thing!" Which the peripheral nervous system then does. Both of these systems contain two different types of neurons: afferent and efferent. Afferent and efferent are biological terms, and they're horribly confusing, and I apologize on behalf of the entire institution of biology for them. Afferent systems carry things to a central point, and efferent systems carry things away from a central point. So afferent neurons carry information to the brain and spinal cord for analysis. In the peripheral nervous system, afferent neurons are called sensory neurons, and they're activated by external stimuli like the complex and glorious flavor of pizza and then they convert those data into a signal for the central system to process. The central nervous system has afferent neurons too, and there they bring information into special parts of the brain, like the part of the brain that goes, "Mmmmmm, salty!" Efferent neurons carry information out of the center. In the peripheral nervous system, they're called motor neurons because many of them carry information from the brain or spinal cord to muscles to make us move, but they also go to pretty much every other organ in your body, thus making them, like, work and do stuff to keep you alive. In the central system, efferent neurons carry information from special parts of the brain to other parts of the brain or spinal cord. Of course if it ended there, it would be way too simple and no good bureaucracy just has two departments. So the peripheral nervous system is actually made up of two different systems with two very different jobs: the somatic nervous system and the autonomic nervous system. The somatic system controls all the stuff you think about doing like all the information coming through your senses, and the movement of your body when you want it to make movements. But here's something interesting: Since we're totally in love with our brains as sort of the center of all being, of ourselves, we think that all the information about everything going on in our bodies goes to our brains for some kind of decision. Not so! Sometimes, like when we touch a hot stove, the afferent neurons carry the signal "HOT!" to the central nervous system, but that information doesn't even ever get to the brain the spinal cord actually makes that decision before it gets to the brain, sends a message directly back to the muscle saying, "Get your hand off the freakin stove, *******!" This bit of fancy nerve-work lets the spinal cord make decisions rather than the brain, it's called the reflex loop. So, the other branch of the peripheral nervous system, the autonomic system, carries signals from the central nervous system that drive all of the things your body does without thinking about them: your heartbeat, your digestion, breathing, saliva production, all your organ functions. But we're not done yet here. We need to go deeper. The autonomic nervous system has two divisions of its own: the sympathetic and parasympathetic. And the jobs that these two perform aren't just different they're completely opposite, and frankly, they're always vying for control of the body in some kind of nervous system cage match. The sympathetic division is responsible for, like, freaking out. You've probably heard this talked about as the fight-or-flight response. In other words, stress. But stress isn't all bad: it's what saves our lives when we're being chased by saber toothed tigers, right? The sympathetic system prepares our body for action by increasing the heart rate and blood pressure, enhancing our sense of smell, dilating the pupils, activating our adrenal cortex to make adrenaline, shutting down blood supply to our digestive and reproductive systems so there will be more blood available for our lungs and muscles when we have to, like, RUN! Even though you're not in a constant state of panic at least, I hope not, I kind of am that system is running all the time, every day. But right next to it is the parasympathetic division, working hard to make sure we take it nice and easy. It dials down heart rate and blood pressure, constricts our lungs, makes our nose run, increases blood flow to our reproductive junk, our mouths produce saliva, encourage us to poop and pee. It's basically what we have to thank for taking a nap, sitting in front of the TV, going to the bathroom and getting it on. So, consider yourself lucky you've got both the stress response and the chill-the-heck out response, working side-by-side because together they create a balance, or a homeostasis. Now, that's what the nervous system does. Next we have to talk about how it does it. The neurons that make up our nervous systems make it possible for our bodies to have their very own little electric systems. So to understand how they work you have to understand their anatomy. Like I said before, a typical neuron has branches like a tree. These are called dendrites, and they receive information from other neurons. Neurons also have a single axon the trunk of the tree which is branched at the end and transmits signals to other neurons. The axon is also covered in fatty material called myelin, which acts as insulation. But the myelin sheath isn't continuous, there are these little bits of exposed neuron along the axon, which have the sweetest names in this whole episode they're called the Nodes of Ranvier. Which seems like an excellent working title for the 8th Harry Potter novel. Harry Potter and the Nodes of Ranvier. Anyway, these nodes allow signals to hop from node to node, which lets the signal travel down a nerve faster. This node-hopping, by the way, has a name. It's called saltatory conduction. Conduction because it's electrical conduction and saltatory because saltatory means leaping. Finally, the place where an axon's branches come in contact with the next cell's dendrite is called a synapse, and that's where neurotransmitters pass information from one neuron to the next. Now, think back to, or just go watch the episode we did on cell membranes, where we talked about how materials travel down concentration gradients. Well, in much the same way, all neurons in your body have a membrane potential, a difference in voltage, or electrical charge, between the inside and the outside of the membrane. You might also remember that this buildup of voltage is handled in part by a sexy little protein called the sodium-potassium pump. Basically, the pump creates a voltage differential, like charging a battery, by moving 3 positively charged sodium ions out for every 2 potassium ions it lets in, creating a net negative charge inside the cell relative to the outside. When a neuron is inactive, this is called its resting potential, and its voltage is about -70 millivolts. But in addition to the pumps, neurons also have ion channels. These are proteins that straddle the membrane, but they're a lot simpler and don't need ATP to power them. Each cell can have more than 300 different kinds of ion channels, each tailored to accept a specific ion. Now, don't zone out here, because all of this stuff has got to come into play when a neuron becomes active. This happens when an input or stimulus creates a change in the neuron that eventually reaches the axon, creating what's called an action potential a brief event where the electrical potential of a cell rapidly rises and falls. When action potential begins, like when a molecule of sugar touches one of my sweet tastebuds, some ion channels open and let those positive sodium ions rush in, so that the inside starts to become less negative. With enough stimulus, the internal charge of the neuron reaches a certain threshold, which triggers more sodium channels to respond and open the flood gates to let even more ions in. That's happening on one tiny little area of the neuron. But this change in voltage creeps over to the next bunch of sodium channels, which are also sensitive to voltage, and so they open. That exchange triggers the next batch, and the next batch, and so on down the line. So this signal of changing voltage travels down the neuron's membrane like a wave. But remember, the myelin sheath insulates most of the neuron, and just leaves those little nodes exposed, so instead of being a steady wave, the wave jumps from node to node, speeding up the travel time of action potential down a neuron: That's your saltatory conduction at work! When the wave reaches the end of the neuron, it triggers the release of neurotransmitters from the neuron through exocytosis, and those neurotransmitters then float across the synapse to the next neuron where they trigger another action potential over there. Now, by this time, so many sodium ions have gotten inside the first neuron that the difference between the outside and the inside is actually reversed: The inside is positive and the outside negative. And it seems like neurons hate that more than pretty much anything else, so it fixes itself. The sodium channels close and potassium channels open up. The positive potassium ions rush down both the concentration and electrochemical gradients to get the heck out of the cell. That brings the charge inside the cell back down to negative on the inside, and positive on the outside. Notice, though, that now the sodium is on the inside of the cell and the potassium is on the outside they're in the opposite places of where they started. So, the sodium-potassium pumps get back to work and burn some ATP to pump the sodium back out and the potassium back in, and phew! Things are now back at the resting potential again. So, that, my friends, is how action potential allows neurons to communicate signals down a whole chain of neurons from the outer reaches of the peripheral nervous system, all the way up the spinal cord and to the brain, and then back out agian. So, let's zoom out, and look at the broad view here. I'm gonna take a bite of this pizza. All my tastebuds have neurons in them. Each of my taste buds contains between 50-100 specialized taste receptor neurons. Chemicals from this beautiful pizza dissolve in the saliva and then stimulate the dendrites on the afferent neurons. This generates a bunch of action potentials that travel from the afferent neurons in my tongue all the way to my brain, which is like, "My goodness, I think that's pizza! Let's have another bite!" The brain then sends messages through the efferent nerve pathways to do all sorts of things: 1. Chew, which involves constricting the muscles in my jaw over and over again. 2. Lower my head down to catch another bite, which involves moving all kinds of neck muscles. 3. Swallowing, which involves constricting the muscles in my throat and esophagus. 4. Opening my mouth again to receive another bite. That signal is also going to my jaw. And that's not even to mention what's going to go on with the digestion of this bad boy, driven by the autonomic nervous system. But digestion is still a couple episodes from now. Hopefully there will be more pizza. Thank you for watching this episode of Crash Course, and for giving me an excuse to eat more pizza. If you want to review what we learned in this episode, check out the table of contents. Thanks to everyone who put this together. If you have questions for us: Facebook, Twitter, or the comments below. We'll see you next time.

Introduction

The IOBC serves as a resource for international organizations, for example: the European Commission on sustainable use of pesticides[1] and the status of IPM in Europe,[2] the EC Regulation of Biological Control Agents with regard to invertebrate biological control agents,[3] the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research on IPM,[4] the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization on biological control agents[5] and the Food and Agriculture Organization with respect to the Convention on Biological Diversity.[6][7]

History and structure

A complete history of the IOBC was published in 1988.[8] Briefly, in 1948, the idea of an international organization on biological control was conceived. By 1950, the IUBS decided to support the establishment of a "Commission Internationale de Lutte Biologique" (CILB) as part of the IUBS Division of Animal Biology and a committee was established to further this concept. In 1955, the statutes of the new organization were ratified by the IUBS and the first plenary session of the CILB took place at Antibes, France. In 1965, CILB changed its name from "Commission" to "Organization" thus becoming the "International Organization of Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants". In 1969, under the auspices of the IUBS, an agreement was reached among organizations to merge IOBC and the "International advisory committee for biological Control" (active in English-speaking countries) into a single international organization under the name IOBC. The scientific journal Entomophaga was the official journal of the organization, until superseded by BioControl. In 1971, Global IOBC was established and the former IOBC became the West Palearctic Regional Section.

There are six regional sections world-wide:

Goals and purpose

The IOBC promotes the development of biological control and its application in integrated pest management and international cooperation to these ends.

The IOBC collects, evaluates and disseminates information about biological control and promotes national and international action concerning research, training of personnel, coordination of large-scale application and public awareness of the economic and social importance of biological control.

The IOBC arranges conferences, meetings and symposia, and takes other actions to implement its general objectives.

Global IOBC

In addition to serving as an umbrella organization for the six regional sections, the global organization publishes proceedings of meetings, a newsletter, books, and has 10 working groups. These groups meet to discuss specific topics, usually agricultural pests which may often have a global impact.

Quality Control Standards

A set of standards were developed for assessing the quality control of commercially produced biological control agents.[15][16] These guidelines have been used.[17][18][19][20][21]

Commission on Biological Control and Access and Benefit Sharing

Under the 1993 Convention on Biological Diversity, countries have sovereign rights over their genetic resources, such as species collected for potential use in biological control. This convention was put in place because the profits from prospecting biodiversity have disproportionately benefited corporations from developed countries. Because researchers and Western businesses complained that giving developing countries such rights is problematic due to the new difficulties in legally acquiring potentially profitable species in several countries,[22] the Commission on Biological Control and Access and Benefit Sharing was established in 2008 to allow such parties access to these resources, with the supposition that any benefits arising from such access should be shared.[23] Parties continue to complain they need more access to the genetic resources of other countries than these standards allow.[24]

West Palaearctic Regional Section

The West Palaearctic Regional Section (i.e. Europe) is the most active of the regional sections with 20 working groups (that focus on crops, agricultural pests, and other topics) and five commissions which usually meet in different locations in member countries. It produces the IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, which in 2007 was listed as one of the top research journals for the organic industry.[25]

Pesticide side-effects standards

The "Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms working group" is made up of scientists from many countries. They establish standards, which are periodically updated, for testing the side effects of pesticides on a large range of natural enemies of crop pests, and rank those effects.[26][27][28][29] The purpose of establishing these standards is to be able to compare pesticides by their effect on beneficial organisms throughout all regions of the world. With the results obtained from these standardized tests, the best pesticides can be identified which enable enhanced survival of non-target organisms and the most biological control due to reduced impact on beneficial organisms.[30] These standards have been adopted a number of scientists worldwide.[31][32][33][34]

Integrated Production

One of the working groups is on Integrated Pest Management and Integrated Production,[35] a concept of agriculture based on the sustainable use of natural resources.[36][37] This group has established crop specific guidelines for pome fruits, stone fruits, grapes, soft fruits, olives, citrus and field grown vegetables in Europe.[38][39]

Official languages

The Organization's official languages are English and French, although other languages may be spoken in some regional meetings.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Sustainable use of Pesticides".
  2. ^ Agra CEAS (2002). "Integrated crop management systems in the EU" (PDF).
  3. ^ "Regulation if invertebrate biological control agents in Europe: review and recommendations in its pursuit of a harmonised regulatory system" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  4. ^ "CGIAR Systemwide Program on Integrated Pest Management (SP-IPM)". Archived from the original on 2017-05-10. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  5. ^ "2nd Joint EPPO/IOBC Panel Meeting on Biological Control Agents". 2009. Archived from the original on 2012-02-23. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  6. ^ Haas, F., van Lenteren, J.C., Cock, M.J.W.; et al. "Is the Convention on Biological Diversity promoting environmentally friendly solutions to pest control?". Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2010-05-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ Cock, M.J.W., van Lenteren, J.C., Brodeur, J.; et al. (2010). "The use and exchange of biological control agents for food and agriculture" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[permanent dead link]
  8. ^ Franz, J.M. (1988). "Highlights in the development of the International Organization for Biological Contreol of noxious animals and plants". BioControl. 33 (2): 131–134. doi:10.1007/bf02372647. S2CID 31264269.
  9. ^ "ATRS | Afrotropical Regional Section of IOBC-Global, International Organisation for Biological Control".
  10. ^ "APRS | Asia and the Pacific Regional Section of IOBC-Global, International Organisation for Biological Control".
  11. ^ "EPRS | East Palearctic Regional Section of IOBC-Global, International Organisation for Biological Control".
  12. ^ "Home". iobcnrs.com.
  13. ^ "NTRS | Neotropical Regional Section of IOBC-Global, International Organisation for Biological Control".
  14. ^ "Home". iobc-wprs.org.
  15. ^ Bigler, F. (1992). Report of the sixth workshop of the IOBC global working group "Quality control of mass reared arthropods". pp. 1–26.
  16. ^ van Lenteren, J.C., Hale, A., Klapwijk, J.N.; et al. (2003). "Guidelines for quality control of commercially produced natural enemies". In van Lenteren, J.C. (ed.). Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents: Theory and Testing Procedures. CABI publishing.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ Hassan S.A.; Zhang, W.Q. (2001). "Variability in Quality of Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) from Commercial Suppliers in Germany". Biological Control. 22 (2): 115–121. doi:10.1006/bcon.2001.0962.
  18. ^ Fernandez, C.; Nentwig, W. "Quality control of the parasitoid Aphidius colemani (Hy., Aphidiidae) used for biological control in greenhouses". Journal of Applied Entomology. 121: 1–5.
  19. ^ Prezotti, L.R., Parra, J.R.P., Vencovsky, R.; et al. (2002). "Flight Test as Evaluation Criterion for the Quality of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae): Adaptation of the Methodology". Neotropical Entomology. 31 (3): 411–417. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2002000300010.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Vasquez, G.M, Orr D.B. and Baker, J.R. (2004). "Quality assessment of selected commercially available whitefly and aphid biological control agents in the United States". Journal of Economic Entomology. 97 (3): 781–788. doi:10.1603/0022-0493(2004)097[0781:QAOSCA]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0022-0493. PMID 15279253. S2CID 32152359.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ Luczynski, A., Nyrop, J.P., and Shi, A. (2008). "Pattern of female reproductive age classes in mass-reared populations of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and its influence on population characteristics and quality of predators following cold storage". Biological Control. 47 (2): 159–166. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.07.014.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ^ Cock, M.J.W., van Lenteren, J.C., Brodeur, J.; et al. (2010). "Do new Access and Benefit Sharing procedures under the convention on Biological Diversity threaten the future of biological control?". BioControl. 55 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9. S2CID 30735425.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. ^ Barratt, B.I.P. (2009). "A review of access and benefit-sharing for biological control: What does it mean for New Zealand?". New Zealand Plant Protection. 62: 152–155. doi:10.30843/nzpp.2009.62.4770.
  24. ^ Haas, F., Lohr, B., Munyi, P.; et al. (2007). "Access to biocontrol agents to combat invasive alien species and the Access and Benefit Sharing regulations" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[permanent dead link]
  25. ^ http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/ofp/ofpjournals.shtml USDA Journal List
  26. ^ Hassan, E., Oomen, P.A., Overmeer, P.; et al. (1985). "Standard methods to test the side-effects of pesticides on natural enemies of insects and mites developed by the IOBC/WPRS Working Group 'Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms'". EPPO Bulletin. 15 (2): 214–255. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.1985.tb00224.x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[dead link]
  27. ^ Hassan, S.A.; Bigler, F.; Bogenschutz, H.; et al. (1994). "Results of the sixth joint pesticide testing programme of the IOBC/WPRS-working group 'Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms'". BioControl. 39: 107–119. doi:10.1007/bf02373500. S2CID 5723268.
  28. ^ Sterk, G., Hassan, S.A., Baillod, M.; et al. (1999). "Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group 'Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms'". BioControl. 44: 99–117. doi:10.1023/A:1009959009802. S2CID 11648542.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. ^ Candolfi, M.P., Blumel, S., Forester, R.; et al. (2000). "Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods Joint initiative IOBC, BART and EPPO" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-11-24. Retrieved 2010-05-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. ^ Bellows, T.S.; Fisher, T.W. (1999). Chapter 13 Enhanced Biological Control through Pesticide Selectivity. In: Bellows, T.S.; Fisher, T.W. Handbook of Biological Control. Academic Press.
  31. ^ Sabahi, Q, Rasekh, A., Sanqaki, A.H., and Garjan, A. (2009). "The persistence toxicity of three insecticides against adult of a thelytokous parasitoid, Lysiphlebus fabarum (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae)". Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 74 (1): 159–164. PMID 20218524.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  32. ^ Venkatesan, T., Jalali, S.K., Murthy, K.S.; et al. (2009). "Occurrence of insecticide resistance in field populations of Chrysoperla zastrowi arabica (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in India". Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 79: 910–912.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ Giolo, F.P., Medina, P., Grutzmacher, A.D.; et al. (2009). "Effects of pesticides commonly used in peach orchards in Brazil on predatory lacewing Chrysoperla carnea under laboratory conditions". BioControl. 54 (5): 625–635. doi:10.1007/s10526-008-9197-2. S2CID 11497065.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ Nash, M., Hoffmann, A. & Thomson, L. (2010). "Identifying signatures of pesticide applications on indigenous and invasive non-target arthropod communities from vineyards". Ecological Applications. 20 (6): 1693–1703. doi:10.1890/09-1065. PMID 20945768.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[permanent dead link]
  35. ^ "IP & IPM: Integrated Production and Integrated Pest Management - IOBC/WPRS, International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control, West Palaeartic Regional Section". Archived from the original on 2010-11-24. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  36. ^ "Washington State University Organic & Integrated Fruit Production". Archived from the original on 2010-05-31. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  37. ^ Vereijken (1990). chapter 18 Research on integrated arable farming and organic mixed farming in The Netherlands. In: Edwards, C.A., Lal, R., Madden, P.; et al. (June 1990). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. United States Agency for International Development. ISBN 978-0-935734-21-8.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  38. ^ Dickler (1992). "Current situation of integrated plant-protection (IPP) in orchards in IOBC WPRS". ACTA Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica. 27: 23–28.
  39. ^ Galli (1992). "Present status of guidelines for integrated fruit production and marketing in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG)". ACTA Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica. 27: 251–256.
This page was last edited on 26 September 2023, at 18:18
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.