To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Graham v. Richardson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Graham v. Richardson
Argued March 22, 1971
Decided June 14, 1971
Full case nameGraham, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Arizona v. Richardson, et al.
Citations403 U.S. 365 (more)
91 S. Ct. 1848; 29 L. Ed. 2d 534; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 28
Holding
Resident aliens are a suspect class because they are a "discrete and insular minority" as well as politically powerless. Laws discriminating against resident aliens must therefore be held to a strict scrutiny standard.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Case opinions
MajorityBlackmun, joined by Burger, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall
ConcurrenceHarlan (in judgment and in parts III, IV)

Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that state restrictions on welfare benefits for legal aliens but not for citizens violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court invalidated an Arizona law that required citizenship or 15 years of residence to receive welfare benefits. The 9–0 decision was written by Harry A. Blackmun.[1]

The state argued that rational basis review should apply, which would require the non-citizen to prove that the law served no conceivable legitimate state interest, or alternatively that the law was not rationally related to the government's purpose. However, the court applied the strict scrutiny standard, holding, "Aliens as a class are a prime example of a 'discrete and insular' minority for whom such heightened judicial solicitude is appropriate."[2]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/2
    Views:
    384 598
    2 848
  • Killer Women | Top 10 Countdown
  • $3000 1 bdrm - Richardson/Humboldt - L train Graham

Transcription

References

  1. ^ Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971).
  2. ^ Graham, 403 U.S. at 372.

External links


This page was last edited on 13 September 2023, at 02:18
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.