File:Schneemann-Interior Scroll.gif

Summary

Carolee Schneemann performing Interior Scroll Photo by Anthony McCall

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work: To illustrate the subject in question Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Schneemann-Interior_Scroll.gif true

This photo illustrates a specific piece of performance art that occurred in 1975. Thus it is not reproduceable. No freely-licensed images are available of this event. This image serves to portray both the artist in question and a very important piece of art in Fluxus, feminism, and performance art. Thus, I claim this image as fair use in good faith. Wickethewok 03:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Licensing

Fair use rationale in Carolee Schneemann:

1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.

Fair use rationale in Postmodern art:

1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.

Fair use rationale in Late modernism:

1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.

Fair use rationale in Performance art:

1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.