To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Federalist No. 43

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Federalist No. 43
James Madison, author of Federalist No. 43
AuthorJames Madison
Original titleThe Same Subject Continued: The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SeriesThe Federalist
PublisherNew York Packet
Publication date
January 23, 1788
Media typeNewspaper
Preceded byFederalist No. 42 
Followed byFederalist No. 44 

Federalist No. 43 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-third of The Federalist Papers. It was first published by The New York Packet on January 23, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. This paper continues a theme begun by Madison in Federalist No. 42. It is titled "The Same Subject Continued: The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered".

The paper contains the only reference to the Copyright Clause in The Federalist Papers. In the brief discussion of the Clause, Madison states that "the utility of this power will scarcely be questioned." He also notes the Framer's intent for the federal government to have exclusive jurisdiction over patent and copyright law. Despite its perfunctory discussion of the Clause, the Paper remains one of the few sources describing the rationales and motivations for the language and intent of the Clause.[1]

The essay also references a desire that the national government be given exclusive jurisdiction over a new national capital and provides the rationale for what later became the District Clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution.[2] The essay references "sufficient inducements of interest to become willing parties to the cession" to be offered by the state ceding land for the federal district to the inhabitants of the ceded territory and that the citizens in the federal district "will have had their voice in the election of the government which is to exercise authority over them." This assertion is often cited in the efforts for DC Home Rule and DC Statehood.

It also deals with the Treason Clause of the U.S. Constitution.[3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    3 369 300
    2 030 467
    2 900 195
  • The Constitution, the Articles, and Federalism: Crash Course US History #8
  • Where US Politics Came From: Crash Course US History #9
  • The War of 1812 - Crash Course US History #11

Transcription

References

  1. ^ Patry, William (2010). 1 Patry on Copyright. Thomson West. pp. 1:18.
  2. ^ The Federalist Papers, no. 43.
  3. ^ Olson, William J. (April 16, 2012). "Case 1:12-cv-00331-KBF" (PDF). Friedman, Harfenist, Kraut & Perlstein, PPC. lawandfreedom.com. pp. 15–16.

External links

This page was last edited on 16 March 2024, at 08:56
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.