The Native Laws Commission, commonly known as the Fagan Commission, was appointed by the South African Government in 1946 to investigate changes to the system of segregation. Its members were: Henry Allan Fagan, A. S. Welsh, A. L. Barrett, E. E. von Maltitz, and S. J. Parsons. It has been described as "[a]rguably the most liberal official document produced in the segregation era."[1]
The report
The commission's main recommendation was that "influx control" of African people to urban areas should be relaxed.[2] This in turn would increase the flow of labour and prevent the problem of migrant labour living in distant rural areas. Another recommendation was the creation of a stabilised population of African workers within urban areas to create a reliable workforce for business as well as an increased consumer base for retailers.
The report was published at a time when Jan Smuts' popularity was low and his detractors had more support. In response, the National Party created their own commission called the Sauer Commission. Its report suggested the exact opposite of the Fagan Commission, i.e. segregation should continue and be implemented across all social and economic areas of life. The rise of postwar apartheid can be attributed to the Sauer commission.
Notes
- ^ Evans 1997, p. 58.
- ^ Suzman 1952, p. 7: "[It] is clear that the old cry 'Send them back' is no longer a solution to the problem…"
References
- Evans, Ivan (1997). Bureaucracy and Race: Native Administration in South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-20651-9.
- Suzman, Helen (1952) [1948]. A digest of the Fagan report. The Native Laws (Fagan) Commission (PDF) (3rd ed.). Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.
 | This article about South African government is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This article related to apartheid in South Africa is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 3 March 2024, at 17:44