To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Emphatic consonant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Semitic linguistics, an emphatic consonant is an obstruent consonant which originally contrasted with series of both voiced and voiceless obstruents. In specific Semitic languages, the members of this series may be realized as uvularized or pharyngealized, velarized, ejective, or plain voiced or voiceless consonants. It is also used, to a lesser extent, to describe cognate series in other Afro-Asiatic languages, where they are typically realized as ejective, implosive, or pharyngealized consonants.

In Semitic studies, they are commonly transcribed using the convention of placing a dot under the closest plain obstruent consonant in the Latin alphabet. With respect to particular Semitic and Afro-Asiatic languages, this term describes the particular phonetic feature which distinguishes these consonants from other consonants. Thus, in Arabic emphasis is synonymous with a secondary articulation involving retraction of the dorsum or root of the tongue, which has variously been described as velarization or pharyngealization depending on where the locus of the retraction is assumed to be. Original emphatic k developed into [q] in most Semitic languages; strictly speaking, it has thus ceased to be an emphatic version of k and has become a completely different consonant. (Accordingly, another common transcription in Semitic languages is q).

Within Arabic, the emphatic consonants vary in phonetic realization from dialect to dialect, but are typically realized as pharyngealized consonants. In Ethiopian Semitic and Modern South Arabian languages, they are realized as ejective consonants. While these sounds do not necessarily share any particular phonetic properties in common, most historically derive from a common source.

Five such "emphatic" phonemes are reconstructed for Proto-Semitic:

Proto-Semitic Phoneme Description IPA Trans. Hebrew Aramaic Arabic IPA Trans.
Alveolar ejective [] Tet ט Teth ט Ṭāʼ ط []
Dental ejective fricative [θʼ] ṯ̣ Tsadi צ Ẓāʾ ظ [ðˤ]
Alveolar ejective fricative or affricate [tsʼ]/[] Ṣade צ Ṣad ص []
Alveolar lateral ejective fricative or affricate [ɬʼ]/[tɬʼ] ṣ́ Ayin ע Ḍād ض [][note 1]
Velar ejective [] Qoph ק Qoph ק Qāf ق [q][note 2] q

An extra emphatic labial *ṗ occurs in some Semitic languages, but it is unclear whether it was a phoneme in Proto-Semitic.

  • The classical Ethiopian Semitic language Geʽez is unique among Semitic languages for contrasting all three of /p/, /f/, and /pʼ/. While /p/ and /pʼ/ occur mostly in loanwords (especially from Greek), there are many other occurrences whose origin is less clear (such as hepʼä 'strike', häppälä 'wash clothes').[3]
  • According to Hetzron, Hebrew developed an emphatic labial phoneme to represent unaspirated /p/ in Iranian and Greek.[4]

General Israeli Modern Hebrew and Maltese are notable exceptions among Semitic languages to the presence of emphatic consonants. In both languages, they have been lost under the influence of Indo-European languages (particularly Yiddish and Sicilian, respectively, though other languages may also have had an influence).

  • In Hebrew, the letter tsadi (from Proto-Semitic ṯ̣, , ṣ́) remains distinct as an affricate /ts/, but without pharyngealization. Emphatic has been merged with plain k in some positions, but remains distinct post-vocally, where the plain consonant becomes /x/, while the original emphatic does not. Semitic has been fully merged with plain t.
  • In Maltese, only emphatic (= q) remains distinct. It is still realised as a uvular stop [q] in a few villages but has otherwise developed into a glottal stop [ʔ]. All other emphatics have been merged into plain consonants. However, they are sometimes still recognizable from special vocalic developments that they triggered before the mergers. Compare sejf ('sword', from Arabic سَيْف⁩ sayf) with sajf ('summer', from Arabic صَيْف⁩ ṣayf). The emphatic prevented the a from becoming e as it did with the plain s).

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    47 303
    1 447
    2 129
  • Learn َArabic difficult sounds 1 : Emphatic sounds , حرف العين
  • Emphatic consonant
  • How To Pronounce The Emphatic Consonants In Arabic ص ض ط ظ

Transcription

Notes

  1. ^ Historically, the emphatic consonant // was pronounced [ɮˤ], or possibly [d͡ɮˤ][1]—either way, a highly unusual sound. The medieval Arabs even termed their language لغة الضاد lughat al-ḍād 'the language of the Ḍād' (the name of the letter used for this sound), believing the sound unique to their language, though it also occurs in Mehri. It is preserved among older speakers in a few isolated dialects.[2]
  2. ^ In some Arabic dialects, especially those of the Hejaz and Najd, the emphatic [] developed to a plain [ɡ] instead of the common [q]. This form of pronunciation is quite old and probably existed already at the beginning of the Islamic conquests.

References

  1. ^ Ferguson, Charles (1959), "The Arabic Koine", Language, 35 (4): 630, doi:10.2307/410601, JSTOR 410601
  2. ^ Al-Azraqi, Munira (2019). "Delateralisation in Arabic and Mehri". Dialectologia. 23: 1–23.
  3. ^ Woodard 2008, p. 219.
  4. ^ Hetzron 1997, p. 147.


This page was last edited on 23 April 2024, at 20:53
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.