To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Di (Five Barbarians)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Di (Chinese: ; pinyin: ; Wade–Giles: Ti1;[1] < Eastern Han Chinese *tei[2] < Old Chinese (B-S): *tˤij) were an ancient ethnic group that lived in western China, and are best known as one of the non-Han Chinese peoples known as the Five Barbarians that seized power in northern China during the Sixteen Kingdoms period. This ethnic group should not be confused with the earlier (狄), which refers to unrelated nomadic peoples in northern China during the earlier Zhou dynasty. The Di are thought to have been of proto-Tibetan origin,[3][4][5] though there is a widespread belief among Chinese scholars that the Di spoke a Turkic language.[6] The Ba-Di (巴氐) were a branch of the Di that intermixed with another ethnic group known as the Cong people (賨).

Only a few special Di names and place names have been preserved in old Chinese books.[7][8][9]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    4 647 566
  • The Persians & Greeks: Crash Course World History #5

Transcription

Hi, I’m John Green, this is Crash Course: World History, and today we’re going to do some legitimate comp. civ., for those of you into that kind of thing. Stan, I can’t help but feel that we have perhaps too many globes. That’s better. Today we’re going to learn about the horrible totalitarian Persians and the saintly democracy-loving Greeks. But of course we already know this story: There were some wars in which no one wore any shirts and everyone was reasonably fit; the Persians were bad; the Greeks were good; Socrates and Plato were awesome; the Persians didn’t even philosophize; The West is the Best Go Team. Yeah, well, no. [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] Let’s start with the Persian empire, which became the model for pretty much all land-based empires throughout the world. Except for—wait for it—the Mongols. Much of what we know about the Persians and their empire come from an outsider writing about them which is something we now call history, and one of the first true historians was Herodotus, whose famous book The Persian Wars talks about the Persians quite a bit. Now the fact that Herodotus was a Greek is important because it introduces us to the idea of historical bias. But more on that in a second. So the Persian Achaemenid dynasty- Achaemenid? Hold on... [audible computer pronunciation] AkEEmenid or AkEHmenid So they’re both right? I was right twice! Right, so the Persian AkEEmenid or AkEHmenid dynasty was founded in 539 BCE by King Cyrus the Great. Cyrus took his nomadic warriors and conquered most of Mesopotamia, including the Babylonians, which ended a sad period in Jewish history called The Babylonian Exile, thus ensuring that Cyrus got great press in the Bible. But his son, Darius the First, was even greater: He extended Persian control east to our old friend the Indus Valley, west to our new friend Egypt, and north to Crash Course newcomer Anatolia. By the way, there were Greeks in Anatolia called Ionian Greeks who will become relevant shortly. So even if you weren’t Persian, the Persian Empire was pretty dreamy. For one thing, the Persians ruled with a light touch: Like conquered kingdoms were allowed to keep their kings and their elites as long as they pledged allegiance to the Persian King and paid taxes, which is why the Persian king was known as The King of Kings. Plus taxes weren’t too high and the Persians improved infrastructure with better roads and they had this pony express-like mail service of which Herodotus said: “… they are stayed neither by snow nor rain nor heat nor darkness from accomplishing their appointed course with all speed.” And the Persians embraced freedom of religion. Like they were Zoroastrian, which has a claim to being the world’s first monotheistic religion. It was really Zoroastrianism that introduced to the good/evil dualism we all know so well. You know: god and satan or harry and voldemort... But the Persians weren’t very concerned about converting people of the empire to their faith. Plus, Zoroastrianism forbid slavery, and so slavery was almost unheard of in the Persian Empire. All in all, if you had to live in the 5th century BCE, the Persian Empire was probably the best place to do it. Unless, that is, you believe Herodotus and the Greeks. We all know about the Greeks: Architecture. Philosophy Literature. The very word music comes from Greek, as does so much else in contemporary culture. Greek poets and mathematicians playwrights and architects and philosophers founded a culture we still identify with. And they introduced us to many ideas, from democracy to fart jokes. And the Greeks gave the west our first dedicated history, they gave us our vocabulary for talking about politics. Plus they gifted us our idealization of democracy, which comes from the government they had in Athens. Mr. Green, Mr. Green, Mr. Green, Mr Green—did you say fart jokes? Uhhh. You don’t ask about Doric, Ionian, or Corinthian columns. You don’t ask about Plato’s allegory of the cave. It’s all scatological humor with you—it’s time for the open letter? Really? Already? Alright. [rolls in] An open letter [the whoopee cushion sounds]- Stan! To Aristophanes. Dear Aristophanes, --Oh right, I have to check the secret compartment. Stan, what... oh. Thank you, Stan. It’s fake dog poo. How thoughtful. So, good news and bad news, Aristophanes. 2,300 years after your death, this is the good news,you’re still a reasonably famous. Only 11 of your 40 plays survived, but even so, you’re called the Father of Comedy, there are scholars devoted to your work. Now, the bad news: Even though your plays are well-translated and absolutely hilarious, students don’t like to read them in schools. There always like, why do we gotta read this boring crap? And this must be particularly galling to you because so much of what you did in your career was make fun of boring crap, specifically in the form of theatrical tragedies. Plus, you frequently used actual crap to make jokes. Such as when you had the chorus in The Acharnians imagining a character in your play throwing crap at a real poet you didn’t like. You, Aristophanes, who wrote that under every stone lurks a politician, who called wealth the most excellent of all the gods.. You, who are responsible for the following conversation: Praxagora: I all to have a share of everything and everything to be in common; there will no longer be either rich or poor; [...] I shall begin by making land, money, everything that is private property, common to all. [...] Blepyrus: But who will till the soil? Praxagora: The slaves. Blepyrus: Oh. And yet you’re seen as homework! Drudgery! That, my friend, is a true tragedy. On the upside, we did take care of slavery. It only took 2,000 years. Best wishes, John Green When we think about the high point of Greek culture, exemplified by the Parthenon and the plays of Aeschylus, what we’re really thinking about is Athens in the 4th century BCE, right after the Persian Wars. But Greece was way more than Athens. Greeks lived in city-states which consisted of a city and its surrounding area. Most of these city-states featured at least some form of slavery and in all of them citizenship was limited to males. Sorry ladies... Also, Each of the city-states had its own form of government, ranging from very democratic—unless you were a women or a slave—to completely dictatorial. And the people who lived in these cities considered themselves citizens of that city, not of anything that might ever be called Greece. At least until the Persian wars. So between 490 and 480 BCE, the Persians made war on the Greek City states. This was the war that featured the battle of Thermopylae where 300 brave Spartans battled--if you believe Herodotus--five million Persians. And also the battle of Marathon, which is a plain about 26.2 miles away from Athens. The whole war started because Athens supported those aforementioned Ionian Greeks when they were rebelling in Anatolia against the Persians. That made the Persian king Xerxes mad so he led two major campaigns against the Athenians, and the Athenians enlisted the help of all the other Greek city states. And in the wake of that shared Greek victory, the Greeks began to see themselves as Greeks rather than as Spartans or Athenians or whatever. And then Athens emerged as the de facto capital of Greece and then got to experience a Golden Age, which is something that historians make up. But a lot of great things did happen during the Golden Age, including the Parthenon, a temple that became a church and then a mosque and then an armory until finally settling into its current gig as a ruin. You also had statesmen like Pericles, whose famous funeral oration brags about the golden democracy of Athens with rhetoric that wouldn’t sound out of place today. “If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences … if a man is able to serve the state, he is not hindered by the obscurity of his condition.” When you combine that high minded rhetoric with the undeniable power and beauty of the art and philosophy that was created in ancient Athens, it’s not hard to see it as the foundation of Western civilization. And if you buy into this, you have to be glad that the Greeks won the Persian Wars. But even if you put aside the slavery and other injustices in Greek society, there’s still trouble. Do I have to say it, seriously? FINE. TROUBLE RIGHT HERE IN RIVER CITY WITH A CAPITAL T WHICH RHYMES WITH P AND THAT STANDS FOR THE PELOPONNESE. Pericles’s funeral oration comes from a later war, The Peloponnesian War, a 30-year conflict between the Athens and the Spartans. The Spartans did not embrace democracy but instead embraced a kingship that functioned only because of a huge class of brutally mistreated slaves. But to be clear, the war was not about Athens trying to get Sparta to embrace democratic reform; wars rarely are. It was about resources and power. And the Athenians were hardly saintly in all of this, as evidenced by the famous Melian Dialogue. Let’s go to the Thought Bubble. So in one of the most famous passages of Thucydides’ history of the Peloponnesian War, the Athenians sailed to the island of Melos, a Spartan colony, and demanded that the Melians submit to Athenian Rule. The Melians pointed out they’d never actually fought with the Spartans and were like, “Listen, if it’s all the same to you, we’d like to go Switzerland on this one,” except of course they didn’t say that because there was no Switzerland, to which the Athenians responded, and here I am quoting directly, “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” Needless to say, this is not a terribly democratic or enlightened position to take. This statement, in fact, is sometimes seen as the first explicit endorsement of the so-called theory of Realism in international relations. For realists, interaction between nations (or peoples or cultures) is all about who has the power. Whoever has it can compel whoever doesn’t have it to do pretty much anything. So what did the meritocratic and democratic Athenians do when the Melians politely asked not to participate in the fight? They killed all the Melian men, and enslaved all the women and children. So, yes, Socrates gave us his interrogative Method; Sophocles gave us Oedipus; but the legacy of Ancient Greece is profoundly ambiguous, all the more so because the final winner of the Peloponnesian War were the dictatorial Spartans. Thanks for the incredible bummer, ThoughtBubble. So here’s a non-rhetorical question: Did the right side win the Persian wars? Most classicists and defenders of the Western Tradition will tell you that of course we should be glad the Greeks won. After all, winning the Persian war set off the cultural flourishing that gave us the classical age. And plus, if the Persians had won with their monarchy that might have strangled democracy in its crib and gave us more one -man rule. And that’s possible, but as a counter that argument, lets consider three things: First, it’s worth remembering that life under the Persians was pretty good and if you look at the last five thousand years of human history, you’ll find a lot more successful and stable empires than you will democracies. Second, life under the Athenians wasn’t so awesome, particularly if you were a woman or a slave and their government was notoriously corrupt. And ultimately the Athenian government derived its power not from its citizens but from the imperialist belief that Might Makes Right. It’s true that Athens gave us Socrates, but let me remind you, they also killed him. Well, I mean they forced him to commit suicide. Whatever, Herodotus, you’re not the only one here who can engage in historical bias. And lastly, under Persian rule the Greeks might have avoided the Peloponnesian War, which ended up weakening the Greek city states so much that Alexander “Coming Soon” the Great’s father was able to conquer all of them and then there were a bunch of bloody wars with the Persians and all kinds of horrible things and Greece wouldn’t glimpse democracy again for two millennia. All of which might have been avoided if they’d just let themselves get beaten by the Persians. All of which forces us to return to the core question of human history: What’s the point of being alive? I’ve got good news for you, guy. You’re only going to have to worry about it for about 8 more seconds. Should we try to ensure the longest, healthiest, and most productive lives for humans? If so, it’s easy to argue that Greece should have lost the Persian Wars. But perhaps lives are to be lived in pursuit of some great ideal worth sacrificing endlessly for. And if so, maybe the glory of Athens still shines, however dimly. Those are the real questions of history: What’s the point of being alive? How should we organize ourselves, what should we seek from this life? Those aren’t easy questions, but we’ll take another crack at them next week when we talk about the Buddha. I’ll see you then. Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan Muller. Our script supervisor is Danica Johnson. The graphics team is ThoughtBubble and the show is written by my high school history teacher Raoul Meyer and me. Our phrase of the week last week was "Un Mot De Francais". If you’d like to guess this week’s phrase of the week you can do so in comments. You can also ask questions about today’s video in comments where our team of historians will attempt to answer them. Thanks for watching, and don’t forget to be awesome.

History

Origins

As early as the Spring and Autumn period, the Di lived in areas of present-day Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan and Shaanxi. They were culturally related to the Qiang, but farmed in the river valleys and lived in wood-frame homes with mud walls.[10][11][12] They might be related to the Geji (戈基) people in Qiang people stories.[13] A distinct branch of Di known as the Ba-Di emerged during the 3rd-century. The Ba-Di were initially Cong people from Sichuan that relocated to northwestern China and intermixed with the local Di population. The "Ba" in Ba-Di refers to the region of Ba, where their ancestors originated from.

Han dynasty

In 111 BC, the Han dynasty established Wudu Commandery (武都郡; around present-day Longnan, Gansu) after defeating the local Di people. Some Di fled west towards Qinghai Lake to live in the valleys, while others submitted to the Han and dispersed throughout the Central Plains. In 108 BC, the Di rebelled against Han but were defeated, prompting Emperor Wu of Han to relocate a portion of them to Jiuquan Commandery.

During the end of the Han dynasty, Di chieftains such as Agui (阿貴) of Xingguo (興國; northeast of present-day Qin'an County, Gansu) and Yang Qianwan (楊千萬) of the White Neck Di (白項氐) allied themselves with the warlord, Ma Chao, against the Han Chancellor, Cao Cao. Agui was killed in battle by Cao Cao's general, Xiahou Yuan while Qianwan fled to Yi province. The Di people who remained all surrendered to Cao Cao. In 219, Cao Cao relocated around 50,000 Di people from Wudu to Tianshui and Fufeng commanderies to deter them from allying with his rival, Liu Bei.

Jin dynasty, Sixteen Kingdoms and Northern and Southern dynasties

The Di were one of the Five Barbarians that founded most of the Sixteen Kingdoms during the 4th-century and early 5th-century. During this era, the Di ruled the states of Former Qin (351–394) and Later Liang (386–403), while the Ba-Di ruled the state of Cheng-Han (304–347). Chouchi (296–580) was another Di-led state which coincided with both the Sixteen Kingdoms and Northern and Southern dynasties.

Cheng-Han (304–347)

Prior to the upheaval of the Five Barbarians, the Di, along with many other nomadic peoples in northwestern China, partook in a number of revolts against the Western Jin dynasty. In 296, a Di chieftain, Qi Wannian, was acclaimed as emperor and led a four-year-long rebellion that devastated the Guanzhong region. Many refugees, including the Ba-Di, Li Te, fled south to Hanzhong and Sichuan to escape the confusion. Li Te became a representative for the refugee families, and in 301, he rebelled against Jin in part due to an imperial edict forcing the refugees to return to Guanzhong.

In 304, Li Te's son, Li Xiong captured the provincial capital, Chengdu and established the state of Cheng, one of the first of the Sixteen Kingdoms and the only one that was not based in northern China. It became a haven for refugees fleeing the wars in the north, and due to the prevalence of Taoism in the region, the Taoist hermit, Fan Changsheng was appointed as the state's first Chancellor. Li Xiong initially took the title of King, before elevating himself to Emperor in 306. In 338, Li Xiong's cousin, Li Shou took the throne in a coup and declared a new state called Han. As both Cheng and Han were ruled by the Li clan, historians consider them as a single polity, thus the name Cheng-Han. The Han was conquered in 347 by the Eastern Jin commander, Huan Wen.

Former Qin (351–394)

As the Western Jin collapsed, the Di tribes in Guanzhong had free rein over the region. One Di chieftain, Pu Hong, declared himself the Duke of Lüeyang in 310 and independently controlled the region until 319, when he submitted to the Han-Zhao. He later submitted to the Later Zhao in 329, where he became a high-ranking general under its ruler, Shi Hu. After Shi Hu's death and the collapse of Later Zhao that followed, Pu Hong attempted to break away by returning to Guanzhong, changing his family name to Fu (苻) and claiming the title of King of the Three Qins in the process. In 351, his son, Fu Jiàn took Chang'an and declared himself Heavenly King of (Former) Qin.

In 357, Fu Jiān (note the different pinyin) overthrew his cousin and took the throne. With the early help of Wang Meng, a Han Chinese, as his prime minister, the Former Qin briefly unified northern China and became the largest of the Sixteen Kingdoms, conquering the Former Yan, Chouchi, Former Liang and Dai by 376 as well as Sichuan from the Eastern Jin dynasty. Fu Jiān vied to complete the full unification of China, but following a disastrous defeat to the Eastern Jin at the Battle of Fei River in 383, his empire disintegrated as his generals took the opportunity to secede. Fu Jiān was assassinated by a rebel general, Yao Chang in 385, and in 394, the last of the Former Qin rulers was killed.

Later Liang (386–403)

Lü Guang was a prominent Di general serving under the Former Qin. In 383, he was ordered to lead an expedition to the Western Regions, thus avoiding the immediate aftermath of the Battle of Fei River. In 385, at the advice of the Buddhist monk, Kumārajīva, Lü Guang returned from Kucha and seized Liang province, making Guzang (姑臧, in modern Wuwei, Gansu) his capital. He introduced a new reign era in 386, but only declared himself King of Sanhe in 389 and then Heavenly King of (Later) Liang in 396.

The Later Liang repeatedly attacked the Western Qin in the Longxi, even briefly forcing it into submission, but was also an internally unstable regime. In 397, after a failed invasion of Western Qin, a string of rebellions broke out in Later Liang. Most notably, the Tufa-Xianbei broke away and founded the Southern Liang, followed by the Han Chinese governor, Duan Ye, who was backed by the Lushuihu Juqu clan into establishing the Northern Liang. Later Liang was unable to stop the rebellions, and in 403, faced with pressure from their rival Liang states, their last ruler, Lü Long, surrendered himself and his whole territory to the Later Qin.

Chouchi (296–580)

Chouchi was a small state located southeast in present-day Gansu. It was ruled by the White Neck Di, which had briefly resided in the region before migrating to Lüeyang, but later returned under Yang Maosou to escape Qi Wannian's rebellion in 296. Chouchi is divided into five periods: Former Chouchi, Later Chouchi, Wudu, Yinping and Wuxing. Former Chouchi was subjugated by the Former Qin in 371. It was revived as Later Chouchi by Yang Ding in 385, which in turn was conquered by the Northern Wei in 443.

That same year, Yang Wende restored Chouchi, beginning the Wudu period that lasted until the death of Yang Wendu in 477. Afterwards, the realm was split between two branches of the Yang clan in Wuxing and Yinping. The Wuxing regime was conquered by the Western Wei in 553, while the Yinping regime seemingly disappeared around the same time. In 580, Yang Yongan (楊永安), a Di chieftain in Shazhou (沙州; a name of a region that appears in offices granted by the Southern dynasties to the rulers of Yinping), joined Wang Qian in rebelling against the future Emperor Wen of Sui, but was defeated by Daxi Changru.

With the fall of the last Chouchi states, the Di were eventually assimilated into other populations.[14][15][16] The modern Baima people living in southeast Gansu and northwest Sichuan may be descended from the Di.

Notable people

See also

References

  • Jin shu Xie Xuan Chuan: 晉書謝玄傳: Wen feng sheng he lei, jie yi wei wang shi [聞風聲鶴唳,皆以為王師]
  1. ^ "汉典".
  2. ^ Schuessler, Axel. 2007. An Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. University of Hawaii Press. p. 209
  3. ^ Dorothy C. Wong: Chinese Steles: Pre-Buddhist and Buddhist Use of a Symbolic Form. University of Hawaii Press, 2004, page 44.
  4. ^ Henry Luce Foundation Professor of East Asian Studies Nicola Di Cosmo, Nicola Di Cosmo, Don J Wyatt. Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries and Human Geographies in Chinese History. Routledge, 2005, page 87.
  5. ^ John A.G. Roberts: A History of China Archived 2016-04-29 at the Wayback Machine. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. page 43.
  6. ^ Guo Ji Zhongguo Yu Yan Xue Ping Lun, Volume 1, Issue 1, J. Benjamins 1996. page 7.
  7. ^ "用麗江白族語試讀趙整歌謠"阿得脂"". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2013-08-25.
  8. ^ "古羌族派分之民族 五 川西北地区的氐类". Archived from the original on 2013-08-25. Retrieved 2013-08-25.
  9. ^ The Baima Tibetans and the Di people of Chinese historical records
  10. ^ (Chinese) 段渝, 先秦巴蜀地区百濮和氐羌的来源 Archived 2018-09-08 at the Wayback Machine 2006-11-30
  11. ^ 四川三星堆之謎新解:平武發現"縱目人"後裔?-搜狐IT
  12. ^ 汉晋时期藏彝走廊中的“氐”
  13. ^ “羌戈大战”与岷江上游古羌人的族群认同
  14. ^ 羌族族源及其文化多样性成因研究 Archived 2012-05-10 at the Wayback Machine
  15. ^ 浅说黑水民族源流
  16. ^ 华夏文化-西南夷——氐羌、笮人及炯人 - 国际在线

External links

This page was last edited on 31 May 2024, at 20:48
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.