To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley
Argued October 14, 1981
Decided December 14, 1981
Full case nameCitizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of Berkeley, California
Citations454 U.S. 290 (more)
102 S. Ct. 434; 70 L. Ed. 2d 492; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 135
Case history
Prior27 Cal.3d 819, 614 P.2d 742 (1980).
Holding
The Court struck down state limits on contributions to committees that advocated the passage or defeat of ballot issues as a violation of the First Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
MajorityBurger, joined by Brennan, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens
ConcurrenceRehnquist
ConcurrenceMarshall
ConcurrenceBlackmun, O'Connor
DissentWhite
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated a California law that set limits on contributions to ballot issue campaigns. The ruling relies heavily on the Court's earlier decisions in Buckley v. Valeo, holding that limits on contributions to political candidates implicate the First Amendment, and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, holding that the state governments have no compelling interest in limiting spending on speech about ballot issues.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    2 353 460
    795
    14 393 052
    3 060 843
    180 798
  • Students Vs. Mexicans: Cultural Appropriation
  • Berkeley Town-Gown Relations: Policy Matters
  • The Lowest GPA Someone Got Into Harvard With
  • Never Sublease Without Knowing This! #renting
  • US🇺🇸 vs. Canada🇨🇦 Healthcare…Which one’s better?

Transcription

See also

References

  1. ^ Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981).

External links


This page was last edited on 13 September 2023, at 01:58
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.