To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Cantelli's inequality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In probability theory, Cantelli's inequality (also called the Chebyshev-Cantelli inequality and the one-sided Chebyshev inequality) is an improved version of Chebyshev's inequality for one-sided tail bounds.[1][2][3] The inequality states that, for

where

is a real-valued random variable,
is the probability measure,
is the expected value of ,
is the variance of .

Applying the Cantelli inequality to gives a bound on the lower tail,

While the inequality is often attributed to Francesco Paolo Cantelli who published it in 1928,[4] it originates in Chebyshev's work of 1874.[5] When bounding the event random variable deviates from its mean in only one direction (positive or negative), Cantelli's inequality gives an improvement over Chebyshev's inequality. The Chebyshev inequality has "higher moments versions" and "vector versions", and so does the Cantelli inequality.

Comparison to Chebyshev's inequality

For one-sided tail bounds, Cantelli's inequality is better, since Chebyshev's inequality can only get

On the other hand, for two-sided tail bounds, Cantelli's inequality gives

which is always worse than Chebyshev's inequality (when ; otherwise, both inequalities bound a probability by a value greater than one, and so are trivial).

Proof

Let be a real-valued random variable with finite variance and expectation , and define (so that and ).

Then, for any , we have

the last inequality being a consequence of Markov's inequality. As the above holds for any choice of , we can choose to apply it with the value that minimizes the function . By differentiating, this can be seen to be , leading to

if

Generalizations

Various stronger inequalities can be shown. He, Zhang, and Zhang showed[6] (Corollary 2.3) when and :

In the case this matches a bound in Berger's "The Fourth Moment Method",[7]

This improves over Cantelli's inequality in that we can get a non-zero lower bound, even when .

See also

References

  1. ^ Boucheron, Stéphane (2013). Concentration inequalities : a nonasymptotic theory of independence. Gábor Lugosi, Pascal Massart. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-953525-5. OCLC 829910957.
  2. ^ "Tail and Concentration Inequalities" by Hung Q. Ngo
  3. ^ "Concentration-of-measure inequalities" by Gábor Lugosi
  4. ^ Cantelli, F. P. (1928), "Sui confini della probabilita," Atti del Congresso Internazional del Matematici, Bologna, 6, 47-5
  5. ^ Ghosh, B.K., 2002. Probability inequalities related to Markov's theorem. The American Statistician, 56(3), pp.186-190
  6. ^ He, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S. (2010). "Bounding probability of small deviation: A fourth moment approach". Mathematics of Operations Research. 35 (1): 208–232. doi:10.1287/moor.1090.0438. S2CID 11298475.
  7. ^ Berger, Bonnie (August 1997). "The Fourth Moment Method". SIAM Journal on Computing. 26 (4): 1188–1207. doi:10.1137/S0097539792240005. ISSN 0097-5397. S2CID 14313557.
This page was last edited on 7 August 2023, at 12:59
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.