| Beal v. Doe | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 11, 1977 Decided June 20, 1977 | |
| Full case name | Beal, Secretary, Department of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania, et al. v. Doe et al. |
| Citations | 432 U.S. 438 (more) 97 S. Ct. 2366; 53 L. Ed. 2d 464 |
| Holding | |
| The constitutionally protected right of abortion does not mean that states have to treat potential motherhood and abortion in the same manner. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Powell, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Rehnquist, Stevens |
| Dissent | Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun |
| Dissent | Marshall |
| Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
Beal v. Doe, 432 U.S. 438 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case that concerned the disbursement of federal funds in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania statute restricted federal funding to abortion clinics. The Supreme Court ruled states are not required to treat abortion in the same manner as potential motherhood. The opinion of the Court left the central holding of the Roe v. Wade decision – abortion as a right – intact. The statute was upheld, with Justice Powell writing the majority opinion.
Background
After the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade those still opposed to abortion in the United States "turned to local legislators in an effort to curb the practice of abortion." This particular abortion case that came before the Supreme Court involved a Pennsylvania law that restricted "Medicaid-funded abortions" only to "indigent women" when deemed medically necessary.[1]
Decision of the Supreme Court
In a 6–3 decision, Justice Powell wrote the decision for the majority. Justices Burger, Stewart, White, Rehnquist and Stevens joined Powell's opinion. The opinion did not disregard Roe; instead, Beal reaffirmed abortion as a right. The majority opinion asserts the constitutionally protected right of abortion does not mean that states have to treat potential motherhood and abortion in the same manner. Furthermore, the opinion allowed restriction of federal funding in the first trimester of abortion. Powell continued by stating the law does not create poverty that hinders poor women from seeking abortion. In addition, Powell defends states' preference on birth over abortion by claiming Roe does not bar preference.
See also
References
- ^ "Beal v. Doe - 432 U.S. 438 (1977)". Oyez: Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved December 5, 2013.
Further reading
- Gall-Clayton, N. (1978). "Beal, Maher and Poelker: The End of an Era". Journal of Family Law. 17 (1): 49–92. ISSN 0891-6330. PMID 11655402.
- Hull, N. E. H.; Hoffer, Peter C. (2001). Roe v. Wade: The Abortion Rights Controversy in American History. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-1142-3.
External links
- Text of Beal v. Doe, 432 U.S. 438 (1977) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This abortion-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 28 May 2024, at 08:10