Bateson's cube is a model of the cost–benefit analysis for animal research developed by Professor Patrick Bateson, president of the Zoological Society of London.[1][2]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:5187 28976 416
-
PyAstro20 - State of the Package: SunPy
-
Conversations - Nora Bateson
-
Part 2 - Perspectives on the Masters - Erickson, Satir, Whitaker, Rogers and Frankl
Transcription
Background
Bateson's cube evaluates proposed research through three criteria:
- the degree of animal suffering,
- the quality of the research,
- the potential medical benefit.
Bateson suggested that research that does not meet these requirements should not be approved or performed, in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. It is not intended as a formal model for optimal trade-offs, but rather a tool for making judicial decisions, since the three axes are not in a common currency.[3] The third criterion also does not necessarily have to be medical benefit, but could be a wider form of utility.[4]
Bateson cube has three axes measuring suffering, certainty of benefit, and quality of research. If the research is high-quality, certain to be beneficial, and not going to inflict suffering, then it will fall into the hollow section meaning research should proceed. Painful, low-quality research with lower likelihood of success will be lower back in the solid area, and should not proceed. Most research will not be clear-cut, but the guiding principle is 'hollow' should continue, 'solid' should not.
References
- ^ Bateson, P. (1986). When to experiment on animals (PDF). New Scientist. Vol. 109. pp. 30–32.
- ^ Bateson, P.; Biggs, P.; Cuthbert, A.; Cuthill, I.; Festing, M.; Keverne, E.B.; King, S.; Page, C.; Petersen, O. (January 2004). The Use of Non-human Animals in Research: a Guide for Scientists (PDF). Rothwell, N.; Rushworth, M.; Walsh, V.; Roberts, O. London: The Royal Society, Policy Document.
- ^ Bateson, P. (2005). Ethics and behavioural biology. Advances in the Study of Behavior. Vol. 35. pp. 211–233.
- ^ Cuthill, Innes C. (July 2007). Ethical regulation and animal science: why animal behaviour is not so special. Vol. 74. pp. 15–22.
 | This animal rights-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This biology article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 6 May 2024, at 05:43