To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arctic haze is the phenomenon of a visible reddish-brown springtime haze in the atmosphere at high latitudes in the Arctic due to anthropogenic[1] air pollution. A major distinguishing factor of Arctic haze is the ability of its chemical ingredients to persist in the atmosphere for significantly longer than other pollutants. Due to limited amounts of snow, rain, or turbulent air to displace pollutants from the polar air mass in spring, Arctic haze can linger for more than a month in the northern atmosphere.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    1 511
    4 467 428
    10 079 361
    5 936
    405
  • NASA Arctic airborne research mission ARCTAS
  • 16 Uses for WD-40 Everyone Should Know
  • $649 Dyson Fan vs. $15 Walmart Fan: The Hard Truth
  • Joe Bastardi: “Tiny amounts of water vapor warm it where it's coldest” | Tom Nelson Pod #183
  • Fine Details

Transcription

[music] >> Jack Dibb, Platform Scientist: One of the places that has been shown to be warming faster than anywhere else on Earth is the Arctic. >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: Given the recent loss of Arctic ice in 2007, which was unprecedented, it’s a fortuitous time for us to be here looking at climate change in the Arctic. We’re particularly interested in the atmospheric contribution to that. >> Hanwant Singh, Co-Mission Scientist: There’s a lot of pollution that is transported there. So our main goal is to see how it is getting transported, where it is coming from, and what impact it might have to the regional climate in the Arctic, which is also a climatologically very sensitive region of the Earth. [music] >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: The NASA Tropospheric Chemistry program has flown these airborne missions for many years now, really two decades. But what brings us to the Arctic at this time is the International Polar Year. >> Jack Dibb, Platform Scientist: ARCTAS itself is the most ambitious airborne sampling that NASA’s ever done, but we’re also collaborating closely with the International Polarcat Campaign. And they will be bringing a whole lot of other international players to the party, including our colleagues from the U.S. >> Hanwant Singh, Co-Mission Scientist: We are putting together an international group to really study this system using all of NASA’s assets. Aircraft, satellites, models, everything we’ve got, to perform a really detailed and intensive study in the Arctic. >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: So in the spring we’re looking at what’s been traditionally described as Arctic Haze. And this Arctic haze has components that come from pollution transport from mid-latitude locations. North America, Europe, Asia, Siberia, all of those locations, all lending some portion of what’s found up here in the Arctic this time of year. >> Jack Dibb, Platform Scientist: One question is how did it get to the Arctic in the first place and then what happens to it after it’s there. >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: One of the more unique things about the Arctic chemically is that unlike other parts of the world where you have what we call a diurnal cycle, the sun rises and sun sets. In the Arctic you have a much longer time span over which you have a dark period in the winter and then the sun rises in the spring. During the winter many things can be transported to the Arctic, but they sort of sit and wait chemically for the sun to come. And since sunlight is the main driver of chemistry in the atmosphere, that becomes an important period to observe. >> Jack Dibb, Platform Scientist: There’s also speculation that the dirt and the black carbon that is in Arctic haze that is deposited just as the sun is coming up may actually change the albedo of the snow and hasten the melt season. As the Arctic warms it’s going to impact how the atmosphere is functioning, but there are a lot of reasons to think that changes in the atmosphere are contributing, are forcing, the Arctic warming. >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: We’re not only looking at CO2, but clearly, methane, and CFC’s and ozone even more importantly. Ozone being a greenhouse gas that’s not emitted by pollution, but is created through the chemistry of pollutants as they’re transported to the Arctic. >> Hal Maring, Program Manager: In the summer campaign we are going to be looking particularly at what gets produced by forest fires. >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: Over the past several decades, the intensity and frequency of boreal fire season has increased, and there are a lot of questions about whether there are feedbacks associated with climate and the increased intensity of fires. >> Hanwant Singh, Co-Mission Scientist: We will also be measuring a lot of aerosols and particles and their composition. >> Hal Maring, Program Manager: What’s of particular interest for us are the impact of those aerosols on radiation in the atmosphere. Do they reflect sunlight away from the Earth? Do they absorb sunlight and cause warming in the atmosphere? Do they cause warming in the atmosphere at a level above the Earth, and actually then, as a result cause cooling at the surface? >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: It is true that while we’re up here, compared to other places, it does look very clean. But at the same time, with sensitive enough instrumentation, you can show clear signatures of impacts that can’t be explained by local conditions. So there is clear evidence of that pollution. >> Jack Dibb, Platform Scientist: Pollution is a transnational issue; that everybody lives downstream from somebody else. And certainly that is tied up with; many of these pollutants are also greenhouse gases or climate forcers. And so, it is, the Arctic is a very sensitive indicator of how interconnected the Earth is and how our activities are impacting it. >> Jim Crawford, Program Manager: Given the fact that the pollution is so far away and so distributed, it’s important for us to be able to see if from many different locations. What the planes are doing right now is they’re providing hundreds of observations that provide an important context to those longer-term observations that can only see the most important variables, but not necessarily all of the ones that are affecting change over time. [music]

History

Arctic haze was first noticed in 1750 when the Industrial Revolution began. Explorers and whalers could not figure out where the foggy layer was coming from. "Poo-jok" was the term the Inuit used for it.[2] Another hint towards clarifying this issue was relayed in notes approximately a century ago by Norwegian explorer Fridtjof Nansen. After trekking through the Arctic he found dark stains on the ice.[3] The term "Arctic haze" was coined in 1956 by J. Murray Mitchell, a US Air Force officer stationed in Alaska,[4] to describe an unusual reduction in visibility observed by North American weather reconnaissance planes. From his investigations, Mitchell thought the haze had come from industrial areas in Europe and China. He went on to become an eminent climatologist.[5] The haze is seasonal, reaching a peak in late winter and spring. When an aircraft is within a layer of Arctic haze, pilots report that horizontal visibility can drop to one tenth that of normally clear sky. At this time it was unknown whether the haze was natural or was formed by pollutants.

In 1972, Glenn Edmond Shaw attributed this smog to transboundary anthropogenic pollution, whereby the Arctic is the recipient of contaminants whose sources are thousands of miles away. Further research continues with the aim of understanding the impact of this pollution on global warming.[6]

Origin of pollutants

Long-range pollution pathways to the Arctic

Coal-burning in northern mid-latitudes contribute aerosols containing about 90% sulfur and the remainder carbon, that makes the haze reddish in color. This pollution is helping the Arctic warm up faster than any other region, although increases in greenhouse gases are the main driver of this climatic change.[7]

Sulfur aerosols in the atmosphere affect cloud formation, leading to localized cooling effects over industrialized regions due to increased reflection of sunlight, which masks the opposite effect of trapped warmth beneath the cloud cover. During the Arctic winter, however, there is no sunlight to reflect. In the absence of this cooling effect, the dominant effect of changes to Arctic clouds is an increased trapping of infrared radiation from the surface.

Ship emissions, mercury, aluminium, vanadium, manganese, and aerosol and ozone pollutants are many examples of the pollution that is affecting this atmosphere, but the smoke from forest fires is not a significant contributor.[8] Some of those pollutants figure among environmental effects of coal burning. Due to low deposition rates, these pollutants are not yet having adverse effects on people or animals. Different pollutants actually represent different colors of haze. Dr. Shaw discovered in 1976 that the yellowish haze is from dust storms in China and Mongolia. The particles were carried polewards by unusual air currents. The trapped particles were dark gray the next year he took a sample. That was caused by a heavy amount of industrial pollutants.[3]

A 2013 study found that at least 40% of the black carbon deposited in the Arctic originated from gas flares, predominately from oil extraction activities throughout the northern latitudes.[9][10] The black carbon is short-lived, but such routine flaring also emits vast quantities of sulphur. Home fires in India also contribute.[11]

Recent studies

According to Tim Garrett, an assistant professor of meteorology at the University of Utah involved in the study of Arctic haze at the university, mid-latitude cities contribute pollution to the Arctic, and it mixes with thin clouds, allowing them to trap heat more easily. Garrett's study found that during the dark Arctic winter, when there is no precipitation to wash out pollution, the effects are strongest, because pollutants can warm the environment up to three degrees Fahrenheit.[12]

Scientific predictions

European climatologists predicted in 2009 that by the end of the 21st century, the temperature of the Arctic region is expected to rise 3° Celsius on an average day.[13] In that same article, National Geographic quoted the co-author of the study, Andreas Stohl, of the Norwegian Institute for Air Research, "Previous climate models have suggested that the Arctic's summer sea ice may completely disappear by 2040 if warming continues unabated."

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ Shaw, Glenn E. (December 1995). "The Arctic Haze Phenomenon". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 76 (12): 2403–2413. Bibcode:1995BAMS...76.2403S. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076<2403:TAHP>2.0.CO;2.
  2. ^ Garrett, Tim. Pollutant Haze is Heating up the Arctic. 10 May 2006. Earth Observatory. Earth Observatory News Archived 2 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ a b "Soroos, Marvin. The odyssey of Arctic haze: toward a global atmosphere regime. December, 1992. Environment Magazine". Findarticles.com. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
  4. ^ Rozell, Ned. "Arctic Haze: An Uninvited Spring Guest". 2 April 1996. Geographical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks. 1 May 2007. Archived 12 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine.
  5. ^ McFadden, Robert D. (8 October 1990). "J. Murray Mitchell, Climatologist Who Foresaw Warming Peril, 62 - Page 2". New York Times. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  6. ^ "Contaminating the Arctic". Content.scholastic.com. 15 January 1995. Archived from the original on 22 December 2007. Retrieved 2013-10-11.
  7. ^ Law, Kathy S.; Stohl, Andreas (16 March 2007). "Arctic Air Pollution: Origins and Impacts". Science. 315 (5818): 1537–1540. Bibcode:2007Sci...315.1537L. doi:10.1126/science.1137695. PMID 17363665. S2CID 40435586. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
  8. ^ "Previously some scientists had speculated that the sooty carbon in the arctic air was the product of natural forest fires, rather than industrial combustion. But a clever application of carbon isotope dating rules out that possibility," observes John Harte, The Green Fuse: an ecological odyssey 1993:19; fossil fuels are comparatively depleted in rare heavy carbon, which decays slowly to nitrogen, so that wildfire carbon is identifiable by its carbon fingerprint.
  9. ^ Stohl, A.; Klimont, Z.; Eckhardt, S.; Kupiainen, K.; Chevchenko, V.P.; Kopeikin, V.M.; Novigatsky, A.N. (2013), "Black carbon in the Arctic: the underestimated role of gas flaring and residential combustion emissions" (PDF), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13 (17): 8833–8855, Bibcode:2013ACP....13.8833S, doi:10.5194/acp-13-8833-2013
  10. ^ Michael Stanley (10 December 2018). "Gas flaring: An industry practice faces increasing global attention" (PDF). World Bank. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  11. ^ Lean, Geoffrey (3 April 2005). "Home Fires In India Melting Arctic Icecap". The Independent. London.
  12. ^ Study: The Haze is Heating Up the Arctic. 10 May 2006. United Press International.
  13. ^ "Summary report of " Arctic Climate Feedbacks: Global Implications" September 2009". Wwf.panda.org. 2 September 2009. Retrieved 11 October 2013.

References

External links

This page was last edited on 31 March 2024, at 10:48
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.