The Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board, Inc. was a private corporation that certified the authenticity of works by the artist, Andy Warhol, from 1995 to 2012.
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:891 8551 700559
-
Pawn Stars: MASSIVE PROFIT on Spooky Old Art (Season 5) | History
-
Suzie Zuzek for Lilly Pulitzer
-
Art on the Blockchain: Interview with Amrita Sethi
Transcription
History
The organization was created in 1995 in association with The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts.[1]
The Board, based in New York City, consisted of six members, including art historians, curators and those who personally knew Warhol and his work. Board members included Warhol's studio manager Vincent Fremont, Warhol's former lover, interior designer Jed Johnson, art curator David Whitney, and Warhol experts George Frei, Neil Printz, and Sally King-Nero.[2][3] After Johnson was killed in 1996, he was replaced by art historian Robert Rosenblum.[4]
The board three times a year to examine works and made determinations only of authenticity, not market value.[5] Appraisals took one month and ARTnews reported that around 10 to 20% of submitted works were 'considered questionable.'[5] The Board did not share its methodology, citing privacy concerns.[5]
The Board sometimes received criticism for its operating methods[1] and what was perceived as arbitrariness in judging whether or not a work was an authentic Warhol.[6] Works deemed inauthentic that were covered prominently in the press include 'Brillo Boxes' produced after Warhol's death and a 1964 silkscreen self-portrait that had earlier been authenticated by Warhol's business manager.[7][6][8]
Dissolution
In October 2011, the Andy Warhol Foundation Board of Directors dissolved the Authentication Board.[1][9] Speaking to The New York Observer, Warhol Foundation President Joel Wachs explained the reasons for the decision, saying the Authentication Board was subjected to legal action '10 or so times' in its 15 years of operation. While it 'won every single one of those lawsuits, [...] the process was extraordinarily expensive, costing us at least $10 million defending ourselves. Eventually, we decided that we wanted our money to go to artists and not to lawyers'.[10]
The Foundation continues to support development of the Warhol catalogues raisonnés, which encompass judgements about the authenticity of individual works.[1] Wachs explains that the catalogue project is primarily scholarly and not explicitly connected to the art market. The editors review works submitted for possible inclusion, but do not render judgement outside the context of the catalogues themselves.[1]
References
- ^ a b c d e Burns, Charlotte (2011-10-20). "Warhol foundation shuts its authentication board". The Art Newspaper. Archived from the original on 2014-10-06. Retrieved 2014-10-01.
- ^ Shnayerson, Michael (2003). "Judging Andy". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 2014-10-01.
- ^ "FOUNDATION SETS UP PANEL TO AUTHENTICATE WARHOL WORK". Deseret News. May 14, 1995. Retrieved 2024-03-31.
- ^ Edward Kaufman, Jason (January 31, 2004). "Andy Warhol Authentication Board rejects claims of impropriety concerting Ekstract silk screens". The Art Newspaper. Retrieved 2024-03-31.
- ^ a b c Maroney, Tyler (January 2002). "Much More Than Fifteen Minutes". ARTnews. Retrieved 2014-10-01.
- ^ a b Dorment, Richard (2009-10-22). "What Is an Andy Warhol?". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 2014-10-01.
- ^ Kinsella, Eileen (November 2009). "The Brillo Box Scandal". ARTnews. Retrieved 2014-10-01.
- ^ Polsky, Richard (2003). "Art Market Guide 2003". artnet. Retrieved 2014-10-01.
- ^ "Statement from The Board of Directors". Warholfoundation.org. 2011-10-19. Retrieved 2012-03-27.
- ^ Grant, Daniel (2014-04-06). "New Legislation Would Protect Art Authenticators Against 'Nuisance' Lawsuits". The New York Observer. Retrieved 2014-10-01.
External links
This page was last edited on 31 March 2024, at 03:52