To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Theodor Schwann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Theodor Schwann
Schwann in 1857
Born(1810-12-07)7 December 1810
Died11 January 1882(1882-01-11) (aged 71)
Education
Known for
AwardsCopley Medal (1845)
Scientific career
FieldsBiology

Theodor Schwann (German pronunciation: [ˈteːodoːɐ̯ˈʃvan];[1][2] 7 December 1810 – 11 January 1882) was a German physician and physiologist.[3] His most significant contribution to biology is considered to be the extension of cell theory to animals. Other contributions include the discovery of Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system, the discovery and study of pepsin, the discovery of the organic nature of yeast,[4] and the invention of the term "metabolism".[5]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    3 873 441
    2 060
    11 400
    14 434
    23 866
  • The wacky history of cell theory - Lauren Royal-Woods
  • Interesting Theodor Schwann Facts
  • Cell Theory- Multicellularity
  • Teoría celular │biología
  • Learn Biology: Cells—Discovery of Cells

Transcription

(Music) One of the great things about science is that when scientists make a discovery, it's not always in a prescribed manner, as in, only in a laboratory under strict settings, with white lab coats and all sorts of neat science gizmos that go, "Beep!" In reality, the events and people involved in some of the major scientific discoveries are as weird and varied as they get. My case in point: The Weird History of the Cell Theory. There are three parts to the cell theory. One: All organisms are composed of one or more cells. Two: The cell is the basic unit of structure and organization in organisms. And three: All cells come from preexisting cells. To be honest, this all sounds incredibly boring until you dig a little deeper into how the world of microscopic organisms and this theory came to be. It all started in the early 1600s, in the Netherlands, where a spectacle maker name Zacharias Jansen is said to have come up with the first compound microscope, along with the first telescope. Both claims are often disputed, as apparently he wasn't the only bored guy with a ton of glass lenses to play with at the time. Despite this, the microscope soon became a hot item that every naturalist or scientist at the time wanted to play with, making it much like the iPad of its day. One such person was a fellow Dutchman by the name of Anton van Leeuwenhoek, who heard about these microscope doohickies, and instead of going out and buying one, he decided to make his own. And it was a strange little contraption indeed, as it looked more like a tiny paddle the size of a sunglass lens. If he had stuck two together, it probably would have made a wicked set of sunglasses ... that you couldn't see much out of. Any-who, once Leeuwenhoek had his microscope ready, he went to town, looking at anything and everything he could with them, including the gunk on his teeth. Yes, you heard right. He actually discovered bacteria by looking at dental scrapings, which, when you keep in mind that people didn't brush their teeth much, if at all, back then, he must have had a lovely bunch of bacteria to look at. When he wrote about his discovery, he didn't call them bacteria, as we know them today. But he called them animalcules, because they looked like little animals to him. While Leeuwenhoek was staring at his teeth gunk, he was also sending letters to a scientific colleague in England, by the name of Robert Hooke. Hooke was a guy who really loved all aspects of science, so he dabbled in a little bit of everything, including physics, chemistry and biology. Thus it is Hooke who we can thank for the term "the cell," as he was looking at a piece of cork under his microscope, and the little chambers he saw reminded him of cells, or the rooms monks slept in in their monasteries. Think college dorm rooms, but without the TV's, computers and really annoying roommates. Hooke was something of an under-appreciated scientist of his day, something he brought upon himself, as he made the mistake of locking horns with one of the most famous scientists ever, Sir Isaac Newton. Remember when I said Hooke dabbled in many different fields? Well, after Newton published a groundbreaking book on how planets move due to gravity, Hooke made the claim that Newton had been inspired by Hooke's work in physics. Newton, to say the least, did not like that, which sparked a tense relationship between the two that lasted even after Hooke died, as quite a bit of Hooke's research, as well as his only portrait, was "misplaced," due to Newton. Much of it was rediscovered, thankfully, after Newton's time, but not his portrait, as sadly no one knows what Robert Hooke looked like. Fast-forward to the 1800s, where two German scientists discovered something that today we might find rather obvious, but helped tie together what we now know as the cell theory. The first scientist was Matthias Schleiden, a botanist who liked to study plants under a microscope. From his years of studying different plant species, it finally dawned on him that every single plant he had looked at were all made of cells. At the same time, on the other end of Germany, was Theodor Schwann, a scientist who not only studied slides of animal cells under the microscope, and got a special type of nerve cell named after him, but also invented rebreathers for firefighters and had a kickin' pair of sideburns. After studying animal cells for a while, he too came to the conclusion that all animals were made of cells. Immediately, he reached out via snail mail, as Twitter had yet to be invented, to other scientists working in the same field, met with Schleiden, who got back to him, and the two started working on the beginnings of the cell theory. A bone of contention arose between them as for the last part of the cell theory, that cells come from preexisting cells. Schleiden didn't exactly subscribe to that thought, as he swore cells came from free cell formation, where they just kind of spontaneously crystalized into existence. That's when another scientist, named Rudolph Virchow, stepped in with research showing that cells did come from other cells, research that was actually -- hmm, how to put it? -- borrowed without permission from a Jewish scientist by the name of Robert Remak, which led to two more feuding scientists. Thus, from teeth gunk to torquing off Newton, crystallization to Schwann cells, the cell theory came to be an important part of biology today. Some things we know about science today may seem boring, but how we came to know them is incredibly fascinating. So if something bores you, dig deeper. It's probably got a really weird story behind it somewhere.

Early life and education

Theodor Schwann was born in Neuss on 7 December 1810 to Leonard Schwann and Elisabeth Rottels.[6] Leonard Schwann was a goldsmith and later a printer. Theodor Schwann studied at the Dreikönigsgymnasium (also known as the Tricoronatum or Three Kings School), a Jesuit school in Cologne.[6][7] Schwann was a devout Roman Catholic. In Cologne his religious instructor Wilhelm Smets [de], a priest and novelist, emphasized the individuality of the human soul and the importance of free will.[8]: 643 [6][7]

In 1829, Schwann enrolled at the University of Bonn in the premedical curriculum. He received a bachelor of philosophy in 1831.[9] While at Bonn, Schwann met and worked with physiologist Johannes Peter Müller.[3] Müller is considered to have founded scientific medicine in Germany, publishing his Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen für Vorlesungen in 1837–1840.[10]: 387  It was translated into English as Elements of Physiology in 1837–1843 and became the leading physiology textbook of the 1800s.[6]

In 1831, Schwann moved to the University of Würzburg for clinical training in medicine.[7][11] In 1833, he went to the University of Berlin, where Müller was now Professor of Anatomy and Physiology.[7] Schwann graduated with an M.D. degree in medicine from the University of Berlin in 1834. He did his thesis work in 1833–1834, with Müller as his advisor. Schwann's thesis involved a careful study of the necessity for oxygen during the embryonic development of the chicken. To carry it out, he designed and built an apparatus that enabled him to pump the gases oxygen and hydrogen out of the incubation chamber at specific times. This enabled him to establish the critical period in which the eggs needed oxygen.[12]: 60 

Schwann passed the state examination to practice medicine in the summer of 1834, but he chose to continue to work with Müller, doing research rather than practicing medicine.[11] He could afford to do so, at least in the short term, because of a family inheritance.[12]: 60  His salary as an assistant was only 120 taler. For the next five years, Schwann would pay the other three-quarters of his expenses out of his inheritance. As a long-term strategy, it was not sustainable.[12]: 86 

Career

From 1834 to 1839, Schwann worked as an assistant to Müller in at the Anatomisch-zootomische Museum at the University of Berlin.[11] Schwann carried out a series of microscopic and physiological experiments focused on studying the structure and function of nerves, muscles and blood vessels.[13] In addition to performing experiments in preparation for Müller's book on physiology, Schwann did research of his own. Many of his important contributions were made during the time that he worked with Müller in Berlin.[6]

Schwann used newly powerful microscopes to examine animal tissues. This enabled him to observe animal cells and note their different properties. His work complemented that of Matthias Jakob Schleiden in plants and was informed by it; the two were close friends.[14][12]: 60 

Described as quiet and serious, Schwann was particularly gifted in the construction and use of apparatus for his experiments. He was also able to identify important scientific questions and design experiments to systematically test them. His writing has been described as accessible, and his logic as a "clear progression".[12]: 60  He identified the question that he wanted to answer and communicated the importance of his findings effectively to others. His co-worker Jakob Henle spoke of him as having an "inborn drive" to experiment.[12]: 60 

By 1838, Schwann needed a position with a more substantial salary. He hoped to return to Bonn, a Catholic city. He attempted to gain a professorship there in 1838 and again in 1846, but was disappointed.[9]: 85–86  Instead, in 1839, Schwann accepted the chair of anatomy at the Université Catholique de Louvain in Leuven, Belgium, another Catholic city.[11][9]: 85–86 

Schwann proved to be a dedicated and conscientious professor. With his new teaching duties, he had less time for new scientific work. He spent considerable time perfecting experimental techniques and instruments for use in experiments. He produced few papers. One exception was a paper in 1844 that reported on a series of experiments on dogs and established the importance of bile in digestion.[12]: 87 [13]

In examining processes such as muscle contraction, fermentation, digestion, and putrefaction, Schwann sought to show that living phenomena were the result of physical causes rather than "some immaterial vital force".[8]: 643  Nonetheless, he still sought to reconcile "an organic nature" with "a divine plan."[8]: 645  Some writers have suggested that Schwann's move in 1838, and his decreased scientific productivity after that, reflect religious concerns and perhaps even a crisis relating to the theoretical implications of his work on cell theory.[13][9]: 85–86  However, other authors regard this as misrepresenting his thinking, and reject the idea that Schwann went through an existential crisis or a mystical phase.[9]: 85–86  Ohad Parnes uses Schwann's laboratory notebooks and other unpublished sources along with his publications to reconstruct his research as a unified progression.[15]: 126  Florence Vienne draws on unpublished writings to discuss the ways in which cell theory, as a "unifying principle of organic development", related to the philosophical, religious, and political ideas of various proponents including Schwann.[8]

In 1848, Schwann's compatriot Antoine Frédéric Spring convinced him to transfer to the University of Liège, also in Belgium.[11] At Liège, Schwann continued to follow the latest advances in anatomy and physiology but did not himself make major new discoveries. He became something of an inventor. One of his projects was a portable respirator, designed as a closed system to support human life in environments where the surroundings cannot be breathed.[13] By 1858 he was serving as professor of physiology, general anatomy and embryology. In 1863, the American Philosophical Society elected him an international member.[16] As of 1872, he ceased to teach general anatomy, and as of 1877, embryology. He retired fully in 1879.[11]

Schwann was deeply respected by his peers. In 1878, a festival was held to celebrate his years of teaching and his many contributions. He was presented with a unique gift: a book containing 263 autographed photographic portraits of scientists from various countries, each of them sent by the scientist to be part of the gift for Schwann. The volume was dedicated "To the creator of the cell theory, the contemporary biologists."[13]

Three years after retiring, Schwann died in Cologne, on 11 January 1882.[7] He was buried in the family tomb in Cologne's Melaten Cemetery.[17]

Bronze statue of Theodor Schwann at the entrance of the Institute of Zoology, University of Liege, Belgium

Contributions

When viewed in the context of his unpublished writings and laboratory notes, Schwann's research can be seen as "a coherent and systematic research programme" in which biological processes are described in terms of material objects or "agents", and the causal dependencies between the forces that they exert, and their measurable effects. Schwann's idea of the cell as a fundamental, active unit then can be seen as foundational to the development of microbiology as "a rigorously lawful science".[15]: 121–122 

Muscle tissue

Some of Schwann's earliest work in 1835 involved muscle contraction, which he saw as a starting point for "the introduction of calculation to physiology".[15]: 122  He developed and described an experimental method to calculate the contraction force of the muscle, by controlling and measuring the other variables involved.[15] His measurement technique was developed and used later by Emil du Bois-Reymond and others.[18] Schwann's notes suggest that he hoped to discover regularities and laws of physiological processes.[15]

Pepsin

In 1835, relatively little was known about digestive processes. William Prout had reported in 1824 that the digestive juices of animals contained hydrochloric acid. Schwann realized that other substances in digestive juices might also help to break down food.[6] At the beginning of 1836, Schwann began to study digestive processes. He conceptualized digestion as the action of a physiological agent, which, though not immediately visible or measurable, could be characterized experimentally as a "peculiar specific substance".[15]: 124–125 

Eventually Schwann found the enzyme pepsin, which he successfully isolated from the stomach lining and named in 1836.[19][6][3] Schwann coined its name from the Greek word πέψις pepsis, meaning "digestion" (from πέπτειν peptein "to digest").[20][21] Pepsin was the first enzyme to be isolated from animal tissue.[19] He demonstrated that it could break down the albumin from egg-white into peptones.[17][22]

Even more importantly, Schwann wrote, by carrying through such analyses one could eventually "explain the whole developmental process of life in all organized bodies."[15]: 126  During the next year, he studied both decomposition and respiration, constructing apparatus that he would later adapt for the study of yeast.[15]: 128 

Yeast, fermentation, and spontaneous generation

Next Schwann studied yeast and fermentation. His work on yeast was independent of work done by Charles Cagniard de la Tour and Friedrich Traugott Kützing, all of whom published work in 1837.[6][23][24][25] By 1836, Schwann had carried out numerous experiments on alcohol fermentation.[6] Powerful microscopes made it possible for him to observe yeast cells in detail and recognize that they were tiny organisms whose structures resembled those of plants.[26]

Schwann went beyond others who simply had noted the multiplication of yeast during alcoholic fermentation, first by assigning yeast the role of a primary causal factor, and then by claiming it was alive. Schwann used the microscope to carry out a carefully planned series of experiments that contraindicated two popular theories of fermentation in yeast. First he controlled the temperature of fluid from fermenting beer in a closed vessel in the presence of oxygen. Once heated, the liquid could no longer ferment. This disproved Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac's speculation that oxygen caused fermentation. It suggested that some sort of microorganism was necessary for the process to happen. Next, Schwann tested the effects of purified air and unpurified air.[27] He sterilized the air by passing it through heated glass bulbs.[24] Fermentation did not occur in the presence of purified air. It did occur in the presence of unpurified air, suggesting that something in the air started the process. This was strong evidence against the theory of spontaneous generation, the idea that living organisms could develop out of nonliving matter.[27]

Schwann had demonstrated that fermentation required the presence of yeasts to start, and stopped when the yeasts stopped growing.[28] He concluded that sugar was converted to alcohol as part of an organic biological process based on the action of a living substance, the yeast. He demonstrated that fermentation was not an inorganic chemical process like sugar oxidation.[27] Living yeast was necessary for the reaction that would produce more yeast.[23]

Although Schwann was correct, his ideas were ahead of most of his peers.[6] They were strongly opposed by Justus von Liebig and Friedrich Wöhler, both of whom saw his emphasis on the importance of a living organism as supporting vitalism. Liebig, in contrast, saw fermentation as a series of purely chemical events, without involving living matter.[29] Ironically, Schwann's work was later seen as being a first step away from vitalism.[23]: 56–57  Schwann was the first of Müller's pupils to work towards a physico-chemical explanation of life.[3] Schwann's view furthered a conceptualization of living things in terms of the biological reactions of organic chemistry, while Liebig sought to reduce biological reactions to purely inorganic chemistry.[30]

The value of Schwann's work on fermentation eventually would be recognized by Louis Pasteur, ten years later.[6] Pasteur would begin his fermentation research in 1857 by repeating and confirming Schwann's work, accepting that yeast were alive, and then taking fermentation research further. Pasteur, not Schwann, would challenge Liebig's views in the Liebig–Pasteur dispute.[30] In retrospect, the germ theory of Pasteur, as well as its antiseptic applications by Lister, can be traced to Schwann's influence.[3]

Cell theory

In 1837, Matthias Jakob Schleiden viewed and stated that new plant cells formed from the nuclei of old plant cells. Dining with Schwann one day, their conversation turned on the nuclei of plant and animal cells. Schwann remembered seeing similar structures in the cells of the notochord (as had been shown by Müller) and instantly realized the importance of connecting the two phenomena. The resemblance was confirmed without delay by both observers. In further experiments, Schwann examined notochordal tissue and cartilage from toad larvae, as well as tissues from pig embryos, establishing that animal tissues are composed of cells, each of which has a nucleus.[14]

Schwann published his observations in 1838 in the Neue notisen geb. nat.-heilk.[31] This was followed in 1839 by the publication of his book Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Uebereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachsthum der Thiere und Pflanzen (Microscopic investigations on the similarity of structure and growth of animals and plants). It is considered a landmark work,[14] foundational to modern biology.[32]

In it Schwann declared that "All living things are composed of cells and cell products".[33] He drew three further conclusions about cells, which formed his cell theory or cell doctrine. The first two were correct:

  1. The cell is the unit of structure, physiology, and organization in living things.[32]
  2. The cell retains a dual existence as a distinct entity and a building block in the construction of organisms.[32]

By the 1860s, these tenets were the accepted basis of cell theory, used to describe the elementary anatomical composition of plants and animals.[3]

Schwann's theory and observations created a foundation for modern histology.[3] Schwann claimed that "there is one universal principle of development for the elementary parts of organisms, however different, and this principle is the formation of cells."[34] Schwann supported this claim by examining adult animal tissues and showing that all tissues could be classified in terms of five types of highly differentiated cellular tissues.[23][6]

  1. cells that are independent and separate, e.g. blood cells
  2. cells that are independent but compacted together in layers, e.g. skin, fingernails, feathers
  3. cells whose connecting walls have coalesced, e.g. cartilage, bones, and tooth enamel
  4. elongated cells forming fibers, e.g. tendons and ligaments
  5. cells formed by the fusion of walls and cavities, e.g. muscles, tendons and nerves[6]

His observation that the single-celled ovum eventually becomes a complete organism, established one of the basic principles of embryology.[23]

Schwann's third tenet, speculating on the formation of cells, was later disproven. Schwann hypothesized that living cells formed in ways similar to the formation of crystals. Biologists would eventually accept the view of pathologist Rudolf Virchow, who popularized the maxim Omnis cellula e cellula—that every cell arises from another cell—in 1857. The epigram was originally put forth by François-Vincent Raspail in 1825,[35] but Raspail's writings were unpopular, partly due to his republican sentiments. There is no evidence to suggest that Schwann and Raspail were aware of each other's work.[8]: 630–631 

Specialized cells

Schwann was particularly interested in nervous and muscular tissues. As part of his efforts to classify bodily tissues in terms of their cellular nature, he discovered the cells that envelope the nerve fibers, which are now called Schwann cells in his honor.[17] How the fatty myelin sheaths of peripheral nerves were formed was a matter of debate that could not be answered until the electron microscope was invented.[36][37] All axons in the peripheral nervous system are now known to be wrapped in Schwann cells. Their mechanisms continue to be studied.[36][38][39]

Schwann also discovered that muscle tissue in the upper esophagus was striated.[17] He speculated that the muscular nature of the esophagus enabled it to act as a pipe, moving food between the mouth and the stomach.[40]

In examining teeth, Schwann was the first to notice "cylindrical cells" connected to both the inner surface of the enamel and the pulp. He also identified fibrils in the dentinal tubes, which later became known as "Tomes's fibers". He speculated on the possible structural and functional significance of the tubes and fibrils.[17][41]

Metabolism

In his Microscopical researches, Schwann introduced the term "metabolism", which he first used in the German adjectival form "metabolische" to describe the chemical action of cells. French texts in the 1860s began to use le métabolisme. Metabolism was introduced into English by Michael Foster in his Textbook of Physiology in 1878.[42]

References

  1. ^ Dudenredaktion; Kleiner, Stefan; Knöbl, Ralf (2015) [First published 1962]. Das Aussprachewörterbuch [The Pronunciation Dictionary] (in German) (7th ed.). Berlin: Dudenverlag. pp. 771, 834. ISBN 978-3-411-04067-4.
  2. ^ Krech, Eva-Maria; Stock, Eberhard; Hirschfeld, Ursula; Anders, Lutz Christian (2009). Deutsches Aussprachewörterbuch [German Pronunciation Dictionary] (in German). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 914, 987. ISBN 978-3-11-018202-6. Archived from the original on 22 July 2023. Retrieved 14 December 2020.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Schwann, Theodor" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 24 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 388.
  4. ^ "Theodor Schwann German physiologist". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 31 October 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  5. ^ Price, Catherine (2018). "Probing the Mysteries of Human Digestion". Distillations. 4 (2): 27–35. Archived from the original on 23 August 2020. Retrieved 30 October 2018.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m "Theodor Schwann". Famous Scientists. Archived from the original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 1 November 2018.
  7. ^ a b c d e Thomas, Tony Abraham (2017). "Theodor Schwann: A founding father of biology and medicine". Current Medical Issues. 15 (4): 299. doi:10.4103/cmi.cmi_81_17. S2CID 90944618.
  8. ^ a b c d e Vienne, Florence (28 November 2017). "Worlds Conflicting". Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 47 (5): 629–652. doi:10.1525/hsns.2017.47.5.629. Archived from the original on 24 January 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
  9. ^ a b c d e Oppenheimer, Jane (1963). "Review: LIVES AND LETTERS OF THEODOR SCHWANN A REVIEW Reviewed Work: Lettres de Théodore Schwann by Marcel Florkin". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 37 (1): 78–83. JSTOR 44446900.
  10. ^ Garrison, Fielding Hudson (8 December 2013). An Introduction to the History of Medicine, with Medical Chronology, Bibliographic Data and Test Questions – Primary Source Edition. Nabu Press. pp. 387–404, 416. ISBN 978-1295393169. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  11. ^ a b c d e f "Schwann, Theodor Ambrose Hubert". Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Archived from the original on 21 April 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g Otis, Laura (5 April 2007). Müller's lab. Oxford University Press. pp. 60–76. ISBN 9780195306972. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  13. ^ a b c d e Aubert, Genviève (2003). "Theodor Schwann" (PDF). In Aminoff, Michael; Daroff, Robert (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 215–217. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  14. ^ a b c Hajdu, Steven I. (2002). "A note from history: Introduction of the cell theory". Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science. 32 (1): 98–100. PMID 11848625. Archived from the original on 24 October 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h Parnes, Ohad (11 April 2006). "From agents to cells: Theodor Schwann's research notes of the years 1835 to 1838". In Holmes, F. L.; Renn, J.; Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (eds.). Reworking the bench : research notebooks in the history of science. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 123–. ISBN 978-0-306-48152-9. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 6 November 2018.
  16. ^ "Theodor Schwann". American Philosophical Society Member History Database. Archived from the original on 29 July 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2021.
  17. ^ a b c d e Karenberg, Axel (26 October 2000). "Chapter 7. The Schwann cell". In Koehler, Peter J.; Bruyn, George W.; Pearce, John M. S. (eds.). Neurological eponyms. Oxford University Press. pp. 44–50. ISBN 9780195133660. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  18. ^ Finkelstein, Gabriel (2013). Emil du Bois-Reymond : neuroscience, self, and society in nineteenth-century Germany. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 51–52. ISBN 9780262019507. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  19. ^ a b Miller, David; Millar, Ian; Millar, John; Millar, Margaret (25 July 2002). The Cambridge Dictionary of Scientists (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 320–321. ISBN 9780511074141. Retrieved 2 November 2018.
  20. ^ Florkin M (March 1957). "[Discovery of pepsin by Theodor Schwann]". Revue Médicale de Liège (in French). 12 (5): 139–44. PMID 13432398.
  21. ^ Asimov, Isaac (1980). A short history of biology. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-0-313-22583-3.
  22. ^ Modlin, Irvin M.; Sachs, George (2004). Acid related diseases : biology and treatment (2nd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 195. ISBN 978-0781741231. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  23. ^ a b c d e Meulders, Michel (2010). Helmholtz : from enlightenment to neuroscience (PDF). MIT Press. pp. 56–60. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  24. ^ a b Schlenk, Fritz (1997). "Early Research on Fermentation—a Story of Missed Opportunities" (PDF). In Cornish-Bowden, A. (ed.). New Beer in an Old Bottle: Eduard Buchner and the Growth of Biochemical Knowledge. Valencia, Spain: Universitat de València. pp. 43–50. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 2 November 2018.
  25. ^ Schwann, Th. (1837). "Vorläufige Mittheilung, betreffend Versuche über die Weingährung und Fäulniss". Annalen der Physik und Chemie. 117 (5): 184–193. Bibcode:1837AnP...117..184S. doi:10.1002/andp.18371170517. ISSN 0003-3804. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2019.
  26. ^ "Schwann, Theodor (1810–1882)". Eric Weisstein's World of Biography. Archived from the original on 23 February 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2018.
  27. ^ a b c Springer, Alfred (13 October 1892). "The Micro-organisms of the Soil". Nature. 46 (1198): 576–579. Bibcode:1892Natur..46R.576.. doi:10.1038/046576b0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4037475. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 14 December 2020.
  28. ^ Berche, P. (October 2012). "Louis Pasteur, from crystals of life to vaccination". Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 18: 1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03945.x. PMID 22882766.
  29. ^ Lafar, Franz; Salter, T. C. (1898). Technical Mycology: Schizomycetic fermentation. C. Griffin and company, limited. pp. 18–19. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
  30. ^ a b Geisler, Eliezer; Heller, Ori (1998). Management of medical technology : theory, practice, and cases. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 267–268. ISBN 9780792380542. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
  31. ^ Schwann T. Ueber die Analogie in der Structur und dem Wachsthum der Thiere und Pflanzen. Neue Not Geb Nat Heil, 1838;Jan:33–36; 1838;Feb:25–29; 1838;Apr:21–23.
  32. ^ a b c Rhoads, Dan (5 November 2007). "History of Cell Biology". Bite Size Bio. Archived from the original on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  33. ^ Schwann, Theodor (1839). Microscopical Researches into the Accordance in the Structure and Growth of Animals and Plants. Berlin: Printed for the Sydenham Society. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 3 August 2010. (English translation by Henry Smith, for the Sydenham Society, 1847)
  34. ^ Williams, Henry Smith (1900). The Story of Nineteenth-century Science. Harper & Brothers. ISBN 978-1145376991. Archived from the original on 5 June 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2018.
  35. ^ Rogers, Kara (15 January 2011). Medicine and healers through history (1st ed.). Britannica Educational Pub. p. 132. ISBN 9781615303670. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
  36. ^ a b Bunge, R P; Bunge, M B; Eldridge, C F (March 1986). "Linkage Between Axonal Ensheathment and Basal Lamina Production by Schwann Cells". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 9 (1): 305–328. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.001513. PMID 3518587.
  37. ^ "Schwann cell". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 3 August 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  38. ^ Jacobson, Marcus (14 March 2013). Developmental neurobiology (3rd ed.). Plenum Press. ISBN 978-0306437977. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 6 November 2018.
  39. ^ Rosso, Gonzalo; Young, Peter; Shahin, Victor (25 October 2017). "Implications of Schwann Cells Biomechanics and Mechanosensitivity for Peripheral Nervous System Physiology and Pathophysiology". Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 10: 345. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2017.00345. PMC 5660964. PMID 29118694.
  40. ^ Schlager, Neil; Lauer, Josh (2000). Science and its times : understanding the social significance of scientific discovery. Gale Group. p. 287. ISBN 978-0787639372.
  41. ^ Baume, Louis J. (1980). The biology of pulp and dentine : a historic, terminologic-taxonomic, histologic-biochemical, embryonic and clinical survey. Vol. 8. S. Karger. pp. 1–220. ISBN 9783805530323. PMID 6986016. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  42. ^ Heilbron, John L. (2003). The Oxford companion to the history of modern science. Oxford University Press. p. 513. ISBN 9780195112290. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024. Retrieved 8 November 2018.

Further reading

  • Aszmann, O. C. (2000). "The life and work of Theodore Schwann". Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 16 (4): 291–5. doi:10.1055/s-2000-7336. PMID 10871087. S2CID 39746208.
  • Florkin, M. (1958). "Episodes in medicine of the people from Liège: Schwann & the stigmatized". Revue Médicale de Liège. 13 (18): 627–38. PMID 13591909.
  • Florkin, M. (1957). "1838; Year of crisis in the life of Théodore Schwann". Revue Médicale de Liège. 12 (18): 503–10. PMID 13466730.
  • Florkin, M. (1957). "Discovery of pepsin by Theodor Schwann". Revue Médicale de Liège. 12 (5): 139–44. PMID 13432398.
  • Florkin, M. (1951). "Schwann as medical student". Revue Médicale de Liège. 6 (22): 771–7. PMID 14892596.
  • Florkin, M. (October 1951). "Schwann at the Tricoronatum". Revue Médicale de Liège. 6 (20): 696–703. PMID 14883601.
  • Florkin, M. (1951). "The family and childhood of Schwann". Revue Médicale de Liège. 6 (9): 231–8. PMID 14845235.
  • Haas, L. F. (1999). "Neurological stamp. Theodore Schwann (1810–82)". J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 66 (1): 103. doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.1.103. PMC 1736145. PMID 9886465.
  • Hayashi, M. (1992). "Theodor Schwann and reductionism". Kagakushi Kenkyu. 31 (184): 209–14. PMID 11639601.
  • Kiszely, G. (1983). "Theodor Schwann". Orvosi Hetilap. 124 (16): 959–62. PMID 6343953.
  • Kosinski, C. M. (2004). "Theodor Schwann". Der Nervenarzt. 75 (12): 1248. doi:10.1007/s00115-004-1805-5. PMID 15368056. S2CID 9572873.
  • Kruta, V. (1987). "The idea of the primary unity of elements in the microscopic structure of animals and plants. J. E. Purkynĕ and Th. Schwann". Folia Mendeliana. 22: 35–50. PMID 11621603.
  • Lukács, D. (April 1982). "Centenary of the death of Theodor Schwann". Orvosi Hetilap. 123 (14): 864–6. PMID 7043357.
  • Watermann, R. (1973). "Theodor Schwann accepted the honorable appointment abroad". Medizinische Monatsschrift. 27 (1): 28–31. PMID 4576700.
  • Watermann, R. (1960). "Theodor Schwann as a maker of lifesaving apparatus". Die Medizinische Welt. 50: 2682–7. PMID 13783359.

External links

This page was last edited on 9 April 2024, at 13:12
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.