To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Social facilitation in animals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lovebirds are well known for mirroring the behaviour of their cage-mates, a form of social facilitation

Social facilitation in animals is when the performance of a behaviour by an animal increases the probability of other animals also engaging in that behaviour or increasing the intensity of the behaviour.[1][2] More technically, it is said to occur when the performance of an instinctive pattern of behaviour by an individual acts as a releaser for the same behaviour in others, and so initiates the same line of action in the whole group.[3] It has been phrased as "The energizing of dominant behaviors by the presence of others."[4]

Social facilitation occurs in a wide variety of species under a range of circumstances. These include feeding,[5] scavenging,[6][7] teaching,[8][9] sexual behaviour,[10][11][12][13] coalition formation,[14][15] group displays,[16] flocking behaviour,[17] and dustbathing.[18] For example, in paper wasp species, Agelaia pallipes, social facilitation is used to recruitment to food resources. By using chemical communication, A. pallipes pool the independent search efforts to locate and defend food sources from other organisms.[19]

Social facilitation is sometimes used to develop successful social scavenging strategies. Griffon vultures are highly specialized scavengers that rely on finding carcasses. When foraging, griffon vultures soar at up to 800 m above the ground. Although some fresh carcasses are located directly by searching birds, the majority of individuals find food by following other vultures, i.e. social facilitation. A chain reaction of information transfer extends from the carcass as descending birds are followed by other birds, which themselves cannot directly see the carcass, ultimately drawing birds from an extensive area over a short period of time.[6]

Moller used a play-back technique to investigate the effects of singing by the black wheatear (Oenanthe leucura) on the behaviour of both conspecifics and heterospecifics. It was found that singing increased in both groups in response to the wheateater and Moller suggested the conspicuous dawn (and dusk) chorus of bird song may be augmented by social facilitation due to the singing of conspecifics as well as heterospecifics.[20]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    44 968
    2 511
    1 474 109
  • Social facilitation and social loafing | Behavior | MCAT | Khan Academy
  • Social Loafing
  • The Line Between People And Pets

Transcription

Voiceover: Imagine you're in front of a group of people and you're about to give a presentation. You look out at the crowd and you see dozens of people, and they're all looking at you, waiting for you to give your presentation. How will the presence of others affect your behavior? Will it help your performance, or will it hinder it? According to the concept of social facilitation, the presence of others will increase the likelihood that the most dominant response for a particular behavior will be shown. So what does that mean? Well, first, the dominant response refers to the response that's most likely to occur. So in the context of your presentation it means that if you practice your presentation for hours on end, you really know your topic in and out, and you generally make very few mistakes when you're practicing it, then the presence of others will lead you to perform very well. It kind of gives you an edge and motivates you to perform well. However if you haven't practiced your presentation at all, and even if you did a couple times, and you made a lot of mistakes, then the presence of others will probably make you perform more poorly than usual. In other words it'll kind of exacerbate, your mistakes. So why does this happen? Well, the presence of others increases your arousal, or your general physiological or psychological excitement. Things like your heart rate increasing, you might be breathing quicker than usual. It's, it's the activation of your autonomic nervous system essentially. And, this is simply known as nervous energy. Your increased energy or arousal leads to likelihood of the dominant response occurring. So whether the dominant response is correct or accurate depends on how easy or difficult a task is, and how well you've learned it or rehearsed it. So the presence of others will likely improve your performance on simple tasks, or tasks that you've learned well over a course of time, and it'll hinder your performance on difficult tasks or tasks that you haven't practiced. So some argue that the increased arousal only takes place when a person's efforts are evaluated, since the situation becomes more high stakes. So what happens when your behavior isn't evaluated? Well in the context of the presentation, example, if you're talking about your presentation concepts with a group of your close friends, who wouldn't be evaluating you necessarily, you may not have any nervous energy, and your performance wouldn't be effected by the presence of others because you're very comfortable with them. But what if you're presenting in a group or to th, the intended audience? Well, as anyone who has ever given a group presentation knows, that's when things can go a little south. When a group collectively works toward a common goal and individuals aren't monitored or evaluated, something called social loafing is likely to occur, which is a separate concept. So social loafing is a tendency to put forth less effort when working on a group task, if the individual contributions aren't evaluated. And if you've ever worked on a group project before you've probably experienced this. Sometimes there's that one person, or few people in the group, who don't wanna contribute anything, because they probably figured that, well, you know, the group will get it done anyway. In other words, it's a group-produced reduction in individual effort. So why does this happen? Well there are several reasons. First, individuals may see their contribution as unessential to success, so they may be less concerned about being personally evaluated. Or they may be trying to guard against being the person who does all the work. So our presentation example, groups experiencing social loafing would be less productive, put forth less effort and generally perform poorly. Now social loafing can be reduced by making the task more challenging, like adding a new component to the presentation or separating the performance of individuals in the group, like giving each person their own grade, as opposed to giving the entire group the same grade. Or you can make the performance of each person essential for success, like if each individual in the group had their own piece to work on for the presentation. So, to return to original question: does the presence of others help or hinder performance? Well, the answer is: it depends.

See also

References

  1. ^ Blackshaw, J.K. "Some basics of applied animal behaviour". Retrieved April 11, 2013.
  2. ^ Zajonc, R.B., (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149: 269–274
  3. ^ Wheeler, L., (1966). Toward a theory of behavioral contagion. Psychological Review, 73: 179-192. doi:10.1037/h0023023
  4. ^ Galef, B.G. (2009). "Recent progress in studies of imitation and social learning in animals". Retrieved April 12, 2013.
  5. ^ Keeling, L.J. and Hurnik, F., (1996). Social facilitation acts more on the appetitive than the consummatory phase of feeding behavior in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour, 52: 11–15
  6. ^ a b Jackson, A.L., Ruxton, G.D. and Houston, D.C. (2008). The effect of social facilitation on foraging success in vultures: a modelling study. Biology Letters, 4: 311–313. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0038 PMC 2610049 PMC 2610049
  7. ^ Dally, J., Emery, N. and Clayton, N. (2006). Social facilitation of novel food acceptance in Rooks. Journal of Ornithology, 147: 154-154
  8. ^ Wauters, A.-M., Richard-Yris, M.-A. and Talec, N., (2002). Maternal influences on feeding and general activity in domestic chicks. Ethology, 108: 529–540. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00793.x
  9. ^ Boesch, C., (1991). Teaching among wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 41: 530-532 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-07. Retrieved 2013-04-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. ^ Rees, P.A., (2004). Some preliminary evidence of the social facilitation of mounting behavior in a juvenile bull Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Applied Animal Welfare Science, 7(1): 49–58
  11. ^ Mader, D.R. and Price, E.O., (1984). The effect of sexual stimulation on the sexual performance of Hereford bulls. Journal of Animal Science, 59: 294–300
  12. ^ Price, E.O., Smith, V.M. and Katz, L.S., (1984). Sexual stimulation of male dairy goats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 13: 83–92
  13. ^ Evans, C.S. and Marler, P., (1994). Food calling and audience effects in male chickens, Gallus gallus - their relationships to food availability, courtship, and social facilitation. Animal Behaviour, 47: 1159–1170
  14. ^ Holekamp, K.E., Sakai, S.T. and Lundrigan, B.L., (2007). Social intelligence in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 362: 523-538 doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1993
  15. ^ Glickman, S.E., Zabel, C.J., Yoerg, S.I., Weldele, M.L., Drea, C.M. and Frank, L.G., (1997). Social facilitation, affiliation, and dominance in the social life of spotted hyenas. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 807: 175-184
  16. ^ Stevens, F.F., (1991). Flamingo breeding: The role of group displays. Zoo Biology, 10: 53-63
  17. ^ Lazarus, J. (1979). Flock size and behaviour in captive red-billed weaverbirds (Quelea quelea): implications for social facilitation and the functions of flocking. Behaviour, 71: 127-145
  18. ^ Olsson, I.A.S., Duncan, I.J.H., Keeling, L.J. and Widowski, T.M., (2002). How important is social facilitation for dustbathing in laying hens? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 79: 285-297
  19. ^ Davies, Nicholas., Krebs, John., West, Stuart. 2012. An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p.160.
  20. ^ Moller, A.P., (1992). Interspecific response to playback of bird song. Ethology, 90: 315-320. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00842.x
This page was last edited on 2 March 2022, at 21:35
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.