To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

National Resources Mobilization Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Resources Mobilization Act
Parliament of Canada
  • An Act to confer certain powers on the Governor in Council for the mobilization of resources in the present war
Citation4 George VI, Chap. 13
Enacted byParliament of Canada
Assented toJune 21, 1940[1]

The National Resources Mobilization Act, 1940 (French: Loi sur la mobilisation des ressources nationales, 4 George VI, Chap. 13) was a statute of the Parliament of Canada passed to provide for better planning of a much greater Canadian war effort, both overseas and in military production at home.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    2 251 197
    1 410 522
    2 964 726
  • America in World War I: Crash Course US History #30
  • World War II Part 2 - The Homefront: Crash Course US History #36
  • Tea, Taxes, and The American Revolution: Crash Course World History #28

Transcription

Episode 30: America and World War I Hi I’m John Green, this is Crash Course U.S. history and today we’re finally going to make the military history buffs happy. That’s right, today we’re going to talk about how the United States with its superior technology, innovative tactics and remarkable generalship turned the tide of World War I. Mr. Green, Mr. Green. Finally. I’ve been waiting for months to learn about tanks and airplanes and Ernest Hemingway. Well that’s a shame, Me from the Past, because I was kidding about this being an episode full of military details. But I do promise that we will mention Ernest Hemingway. And in a few weeks I will tell you about how he liberated the martinis of Paris. intro Americans were only involved in the Great War for 19 months and, compared with the other belligerents, we didn’t do much fighting. Still, the war had profound effects on America at home, on its place in the world and it also resulted in an amazing number of war memorials right here in Indianapolis. So, The Great War, which lasted from 1914 until 1918, and featured a lot of men with hats and rifles, cost the lives of an estimated 10 million soldiers. Also the whole thing was kind of horrible and pointless, unless you love art and literature about how horrible and pointless World War I was in which case, it was a real bonanza. So, when the war broke out, America remained neutral, because we were a little bit isolationist owing to the fact that we were led, of course, by President Wilson. But many Americans sided with the British because by 1914 we’d pretty much forgotten about all the bad parts of British rule, like all that tea and monarchy. Plus, they’re so easy to talk to with their English. But there were a significant number of Progressives who worried that involvement in the war would get in the way of social reforms at home. In fact, Wilson courted these groups in the 1916 presidential campaign running on the slogan “He kept us out of War.” And will continue to keep us out of war until we reelect him and then he gets us into war. But, for that slogan to make sense, there had to have been some way in which war was avoided, which brings me to one of the classic errors made by American history students. What? I haven’t even said anything yet. But you were about to, Me From the Past, because if I had asked you what event led the U.S. to enter World War I, you would have surely told me that it was the sinking of the cruise ship Lusitania by German submarines. 124 American passengers died when the ship, which had been carrying arms and also guns, was torpedoed off the coast of Ireland. Even though Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan had warned Americans not to travel on British, French, or German ships, Wilson refused to ban such travel because, you know: freedom. Bryan promptly resigned. So how do I know it wasn’t the immediate cause of our involvement in the war? Because the United States declared war on Germany and the Central powers on April 2, 1917, almost two years after the sinking of the Lusitania. So why did the United States declare war for only the fourth time in its history? Was it the Germans’ decision to resume unrestricted submarine warfare in early 1917? Was it the interception and publication of the Zimmerman Telegram in which the German Foreign Secretary promised to help Mexico get back California if they joined Germany in a war against the U.S? Or was it the fall of the Tsarist regime in Russia, which made Wilson’s claims that he wanted to fight to make the world safe for democracy a bit more plausible? Yes, yes, and yes. Also there was our inclination to help Britain, to whom we had loaned a $2 billion. That’s the thing about wars. They never start for easy, simple reasons like Lusitania sinkings. Stupid truth, always resisting simplicity. Oh, it’s time for the Mystery Document? The rules here are simple. I guess the author of the mystery document. I’m either right or I get shocked I. [or possibly “one”] Open covenants of peace, openly arrived at, after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view. II. [I’m starting to think these are Roman numerals] Absolute freedom of navigation upon the seas, outside territorial waters, alike in peace and in war, except as the seas may be closed in whole or in part by international action for the enforcement of international covenants III. The removal, so far as possible, of all economic barriers and the establishment of an equality of trade conditions among all the nations consenting to the peace and associating themselves for it’s maintenance. [And] XIV. [I’m going to guess we skipped some.] A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity of great and small states alike. Stan, thank you for throwing me a softball. That’s my favorite kind of ball. Other than you, Wilson. With its mention of self-determination, freedom of the seas, open diplomacy, and liberal use of Roman numerals, I know it is Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points. Our second consecutive Woodrow Wilson week and my second consecutive non-shock. Given all of his quasi-imperialism, there’s something a little bit ideologically inconsistent about Wilson, but his Fourteen Points are pretty admirable as a statement of purpose. Most of them deal specifically with colonial possessions, and were pretty much ignored, but I suppose if we have learned anything, it’s that in American history, it’s the thought that counts. [Libertage] America’s primary contribution to the Entente powers winning the war was economic as we sent all sorts of arms and money “over there.” Troops didn’t arrive until the spring of 1918 and eventually over 1 million American doughboys served under General John J. Pershing. Not all of these people saw combat. They were much more likely to die of flu than bullet wounds, but their sheer numbers were enough to force the defeat of the exhausted Germans. And now, as promised, I will mention Ernest Hemingway. He served as an ambulance driver, which gave him a close up view of death and misery and led to his membership in the so called Lost Generation of writers who lived in Paris in the 1920s and tried to make sense of everything. Turns out, it’s pretty hard to make sense of and you’re just going to end up with a lot of six-toed cats and then eventually suicide. Okay, so I said earlier than a lot of American Progressives were anti-war, but certainly not all of them. Like, according to Randolph Bourne, “War is the health of the state.” And for progressives like him, “the war offered the possibility of reforming American society along scientific lines, instilling a sense of national unity and self-sacrifice, and expanding social justice.” Let’s go to the ThoughtBubble. World War I made the national government much more powerful than it had ever been. Like, in May of 1917, Congress passed the selective service act, which required 24 million men to register for the draft and eventually increased the size of the army from 120,000 to 5 million. The government also commandeered control of much of the economy to get the country ready to fight, creating new agencies to regulate industry, transportation, labor relations, and agriculture. The War Industries Board took charge of all elements of wartime production setting quotas and prices and establishing standardized specification for almost everything, even down to the color of shoes. The Railroad Administration administered transportation, and the Fuel Agency rationed coal and oil. This regulation sometimes brought about some of the progressives’ goals. Like, the War Labor Board, for instance, pushed for a minimum wage, eight hour days and the rights of workers to form unions. Wages rose substantially in the era, working conditions improved and union membership skyrocketed. But then so did taxes, and the wealthiest Americans ended up on the hook for 60% of their income. Also, in World War I as never before, the government used its power to shape public opinion. In 1917 the Wilson administration created the Committee on Public Information, which only sounds like it’s from an Orwell novel. Headed by George Creel, the CPI’s team created a wave of propaganda to get Americans to support the war, printing pamphlets, making posters and advertising in swanky motion pictures. The best known strategies were the speeches of 75,000 four minute men, who in that amount of time delivered messages of support for the war in theaters, schools, and other public venues. The key concepts in the CPI propaganda effort were democracy and freedom. “Creel believed that the war would accelerate movement towards solving the “age old problems of poverty, inequality, oppression, and unhappiness,” because, obviously, war is the most effective antidepressant. Thanks, Thoughtbubble. So the aforementioned Randolph Bourne might have had good things so say about war, but he was also correct when he suggested that the war would encourage and empower the “least democratic forces in American life.” World War I may have been a war to make the world safe for democracy but according to one historian “the war inaugurated the most intense repression of civil liberties the nation has ever known.” War suppressing civil liberties, eh? I’m glad those days have passed. Speaking of the repression of civil liberties, the NSA is about to start watching this video because I’m about to use the word “espionage.” The Espionage act of 1917 prohibited spying, interfering with the draft and “false statements” that might impede military success. Even more troubling was the Sedition Act passed in 1918, which criminalized statements that were intended to cast “contempt, scorn or disrepute” on our form of government or that advocated interference with the war effort. So basically these laws made it a crime to criticize either the war or the government. In fact, Eugene Debs, the Socialist who ran for president in 1912, was one of those convicted for giving an anti-war speech. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison and he served three of them, but he ran for president from prison and got 900,000 votes. Fortunately, thanks to checks and balances, you can turn to the courts. Unfortunately, they weren’t very helpful. Like in Schenck v. the U.S., the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a guy named Schenck for encouraging people to avoid the draft and ruled that the government can punish critical speech when it presents a “clear and present danger,” to the state and its citizens. This was when Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes introduced the famous exception to free speech, that it is not okay to “shout fire in a crowded theater.” Nor apparently is it okay to shout, “We shouldn’t be in this war, I don’t think. Just my opinion.” But, some went even further. The 250,000 strong American Protective League helped the Justice Department identify radicals by harassing people in what were called “slacker raids.” Good thing those stopped before you got to high school, right Me from the Past? Slacker. In Bisbee, Arizona vigilantes went so far to put striking copper miners in boxcars, shipped them out to the middle of the desert and left them there. The war also raised the question of what it meant to be a ‘real American.’ Like, public schools “Americanized” immigrants and sought to “implant in their children, so far as can be done, the Anglo-Saxon conceptions of righteousness, law and order, and popular government.” Many cities sponsored Americanization pageants, especially around the Fourth of July, which the CPI in 1918 re-christened “Loyalty Day”. Hamburgers, a German word, became liberty sandwiches. World War I certainly didn’t create anti-immigrant feeling in the United States, but it was used to justify it. Like, IQ tests, introduced to screen army applicants, were soon used to argue that certain immigrant groups were inferior to white protestants and could never be fully assimilated into the United States. Now, of course, those tests were tremendously biased, but no matter. But, to return to the questions of dissent and free speech, the suppression continued after the war with the 1919 Palmer Raids, for instance, named after Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer and headed up by a young J. Edgar Hoover. To be fair, someone did try to blow up Palmer. So there was some dissent related to the suppression of dissent. Also, more than 4 million workers engaged in strikes in the United States in 1919 but that didn’t legally justify the arrest of more than 5,000 suspected radicals and labor organizers. Most of them were arrested without warrants and held without charge, sometimes for months. And it’s difficult to imagine that all of this would have happened without the heightened sense of patriotism that always accompanies war. However, there were a handful of good things to come out of the Great War, and not just the stylings of Irving Berlin. Like, students are often taught that the war led directly to the passage of the 19th amendment, although a number of states had actually granted the franchise to women before the war. In Montana, for instance, women didn’t just vote, they held office. Congresswoman Jeannette Rankin voted against the declaration of war in 1917, and was the only member of the House to vote against the declaration of war against Japan in 1941. New opportunities in wartime industry also provided incentives for African Americans to move north, thus beginning the so-called great migration and the growth of black populations in northern cities like Chicago and New York. The biggest gain was in Detroit where between 1910 and 1920 the black population rose from 5,741 to 40,838, a 611% increase. So it’s true that World War I provided some new opportunities for African Americans and women, but if World War I was supposed to be an opportunity for America to impose its progressive ideas on the rest of the world, it failed. The Versailles peace conference where Wilson tried to implement his 14 Points raised hope for a new diplomatic order. But, the results of the treaty made the 14 points look hypocritical. I mean, especially when Britain and France took control of Germany’s former colonies and carved up the Arabian provinces of the Ottoman Empire into new spheres of influence. Wilson’s dream of a League of Nations was realized, but the U.S. never joined it largely because Congress was nervous about giving up its sovereign power to declare war. And disappointment over the outcome of World War I led the U.S. to, for the most part, retreat into isolationism until World War II. And therein lies the ultimate failure of World War I. It’s not called “The World War,” it’s called “World War I,” because then we had to go and have a freaking other one. We’ll talk about that in a few weeks, but next week we get to talk about suffrage. Yes! We finally did something right. I’ll see you then. Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan Muller. Our script supervisor is Meredith Danko. The associate producer is Danica Johnson. The show is written by my high school history teacher Raoul Meyer, Rosianna Rojas, and myself. And our graphics team is Thought Café. Every week, there’s a new caption for the Libertage. If you’d like to suggest one, you can do so in comments where you can also ask questions about today’s video that will be answered by our team of historians. Thanks for watching Crash Course and as we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be awesome. Stan, can you do some movie magic to get me out of here? Perfect.

Scope

Modelled on the British Emergency Powers (Defence) Act 1939, as amended in 1940, it gave the Canadian government the power to

do and authorize such acts and things, and make from time to time such orders and regulations, requiring persons to place themselves, their services and their property at the disposal of His Majesty in right of Canada, as may be deemed necessary or expedient for securing the public safety, the defence of Canada, the maintenance of public order, or the efficient prosecution of the war, or for maintaining supplies or services essential to the life of the community.[2]

This was the basis of all organization for Canada's war production.

Preparation for military readiness

In order to prepare the population for military service, provision was made under the Act for:

  • compulsory national registration[3][4]
  • restricting men eligible for military service from obtaining civilian employment in positions considered not to be essential to the war effort, so that women, and men who had been discharged from service or who were ineligible for service, could be hired instead[5]
  • requiring men to submit to medical treatment in order to be called up for military service[6]
  • conscription[7]

Employment control

The Act was also used to ensure greater efficiency that was required in a wartime economy by:

  • requiring employers to report who their employees were[8]
  • barring agricultural workers, after March 23, 1942, from obtaining non-agricultural employment (other than in primary industry, active service or military training) without permission[9]
  • from June 17, 1942, requiring any worker to obtain a permit before he or she could start working for an employer, and such permission could be refused[10]
  • from September 1, 1942, instituting a national system of employment control under the National Selective Service Regulations, 1942, so that no-one could seek a new job without possessing a permit to do so, no employer could advertise for workers without permission, no-one was allowed to be out of work for more than seven days, and anyone could be required to apply for any available full-time suitable work of high or very high labour priority and to accept any such work offered to him.[11][12] In conjunction with these measures, the Wartime Prices and Trade Board restricted non-essential industrial activity to the minimum needed for civilian requirements[13] (although tensions existed between the Board and the National Selective Service).[14]
  • issuing Compulsory Employment Transfer Orders, compelling certain classes of men to engage in essential employment, and requiring their current employers to release them for that purpose, during several stages in 1943:
Classes of men compelled to engage in essential employment, by Order[15] (in force until May 17, 1945)[16]
Order Age or status In stated industries Or in stated occupations
1st Order (May 19, 1943)[17]
  • Anyone born in 1917–1924 who has turned 19
  • Anyone born in 1902–1916 who, at July 15, 1940, was unmarried, divorced or judicially separated, or a widower without children (or who has become divorced, judicially separated or such a widower since that date)
  • taverns; liquor, wine and beer stores
  • retail sales of candy, confectionery, tobacco, books, stationery and news
  • barber shops and beauty parlors
  • retail and wholesale florists
  • service stations
  • retail sale of motor vehicles and accessories
  • retail sale of sporting goods or musical instruments
  • waiter, taxi driver, elevator operator, hotel bell boy, domestic servant
  • entertainment
  • dyeing, cleaning and pressing (not including laundry work), baths, guide service, shoe shining
2nd Order (June 15, 1943)[18]
  • As for 1st Order
  • retail stores
  • manufacture of specified non-essential items
  • distilling alcohol for beverages
  • factory production of statuary and art goods
  • ice cream parlours and soda fountains
  • bus boys
  • charmen and cleaners
  • custom furriers
  • dancing teachers
  • dishwashers
  • doormen and starters
  • greens keepers
  • grounds keepers
  • porters (other than on railways)
  • private chauffeurs
3rd Order (July 15, 1943)[19]
  • Anyone born in 1917–1927 who has turned 16
  • Anyone born in 1902–1916 who, at July 15, 1940, was unmarried, divorced or judicially separated, or a widower without children (or who has become divorced, judicially separated or such a widower since that date)
  • any wholesale activity not listed as essential
  • raising of special livestock (i.e., racehorses and pets)
  • flower growing
  • horticultural services, except tree surgery
  • leather currying, finishing, embossing and japanning
  • brewing
  • manufacture of specified non-essential items (further list)
4th Order (July 23, 1943)[20]
  • All young men who have reached their 16th birthday, but have not yet reached their 19th birthday
  • As in 1st and 2nd Orders
  • As in 1st and 2nd Orders
5th Order (August 3, 1943)[21]
  • As in 3rd Order
  • Candy, confectionery, soft drinks, flavouring extracts, syrups and essential oils
  • Tobacco, tobacco pipes and cigarette holders
  • Hats and caps, artificial leather, padding and upholstery filling for general use
  • Various furniture, furnishings, fixtures, children's vehicles
  • Monuments and tombstones, other stone and metal work, advertising signs and displays
  • Pianos and organs, musical instrument parts and materials, games, toys and dolls
  • Pens, mechanical pencils and pen points; artists' materials, jewellery and instrument cases
  • Various retail, household and service machines; beauty and barber equipment; vacuum cleaners
  • Art, authors, museums; library operations, photography; lapidary work
  • Costume renting; manufacture of wigs, toupees, braids and switches
  • Fur dressing and dyeing; fur storage
6th Order (September 3, 1943)[22]
  • Extended to all men aged 16 to 40 (inclusive)
  • As in previous Orders
  • As in previous Orders
7th Order (November 29, 1943)[23]
  • As in 6th Order
  • Insurance
  • Short term credit, stock brokers, financial institutions other than banks
  • Real estate (finance and operation)
  • Travel agencies
  • Year-round hotels (other than for skilled trades)
  • Seasonal hotels, other types of short-term lodging
  • Millinery, bedspreads, trimmings and embroideries
  • Various costumes, uniforms and gowns
  • Washing and polishing of automobiles
  • From September 1, 1943, employers in high-priority industries were prohibited from releasing any of their employees, and such employees were barred from giving notice of separation, without the written permission of a National Selective Service officer,[24] and such controls continued until September 17, 1945.[25]

Nature of conscription

The Act permitted conscripts (known as "R men"[26] or "zombies"[27]) to be used for home defence only and not to be deployed overseas. The "Zombies" were so-called because they were soldiers who could not fight overseas in the war, making them like the zombies of Haitian mythology who were neither dead nor alive, but rather somewhere in-between. In 1942, the Act was amended to remove the prohibition on conscripts serving outside Canada, and the first overseas campaign that NRMA recruits were subsequently involved in was the recapture of the island of Kiska in August 1943.[28] Until November 1944, only those Canadians who had volunteered were sent elsewhere overseas.

The rule prohibiting "Zombies" from being sent to fight overseas was modified after a plebiscite was held on the matter on 27 April 1942 where the majority of people in the 8 English-speaking provinces voted to release Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King from his promise not to send the Zombies overseas. By contrast, Quebec voted by a large majority against overseas conscription in the referendum. As Quebec was the one province that Mackenzie King really wanted to vote yes in the plebiscite, Quebec's non vote placed the prime minister in the dilemma of honoring the wishes of the majority of English Canada vs. alienating the wishes of majority in French Canada. Such an order, authorizing the transfer of 16,000 conscripts to England, was not made until November 1944.[29] This precipitated the Conscription Crisis of 1944, and resulted in several Quebec Liberal MPs leaving the party in protest. 9,667 NRMA recruits were sent to England, of which two-thirds only arrived after V-E Day.[29]

The Zombies were widely disliked and regarded as cowards by the men who had volunteered for overseas service.[30] The Zombies wore a black tie and collared shirt as part of their uniform while volunteers for overseas duties did not.[30] In April 1945 when the men of the First Canadian Army were informed that henceforth they would now wear the Zombie black tie and collared shirt, the writer Farley Mowat serving with the Hastings and Prince Edward Regiment wrote: "the black tie itself was known as the Zombie tie, and the resentment of the volunteers, who were now ordered to wear this symbol of shame, was most outspoken."[30]

References

  1. ^ Canada Gazette notice, June 21, 1940, 4th Extra
  2. ^ Byers 1996, pp. 177–178.
  3. ^ "National Resources Mobilization Act (1940) - Canadian records for Genealogists".
  4. ^ "1940 National Registration". Collections Canada. Archived from the original on 2012-04-13.
  5. ^ Restricted Occupations Order, March 21, 1942
  6. ^ Order in Council, March 23, 1942
  7. ^ Proclamation calling up for military training, September 11, 1940
  8. ^ Order in Council, March 2, 1942
  9. ^ "Stabilization of Employment in Agriculture Regulations, 1942".
  10. ^ "Control of Employment Regulations, 1942".
  11. ^ "Wartime Control Of Employment In Canada". Labour Gazette. XLII (9): 1018–1026. September 1942.
  12. ^ "National Selective Service Regulations, 1942".
  13. ^ "Price Control In Canada During September, 1942". Labour Gazette. XLII (10): 1143–1147. October 1942.
  14. ^ Stevenson 2001, pp. 172–173.
  15. ^ Stevenson 2001, pp. 30–31.
  16. ^ "Relaxation of Certain Manpower Controls". Labour Gazette. XLV (6): 803–804. June 1945.
  17. ^ "National Selective Service: First Compulsory Employment Transfer Order". The Montreal Gazette. May 15, 1943. Retrieved July 18, 2013.
  18. ^ "National Selective Service: Second Compulsory Employment Transfer Order". The Montreal Gazette. May 29, 1943. Retrieved July 18, 2013.
  19. ^ "National Selective Service: Third Compulsory Employment Transfer Order". The Montreal Gazette. July 10, 1943. Retrieved July 18, 2013.
  20. ^ "National Selective Service: Fourth Compulsory Employment Transfer Order". The Coaticook Observer. July 23, 1943. Retrieved July 23, 2013.
  21. ^ "National Selective Service: Fifth Compulsory Employment Transfer Order". Saskatoon Star-Phoenix. August 3, 1943. Retrieved July 23, 2013.
  22. ^ "Extension of Compulsory Employment Transfers". Ottawa Citizen. September 3, 1943. Retrieved July 23, 2013.
  23. ^ "National Selective Service: Seventh Compulsory Employment Transfer Order". The Montreal Gazette. November 1943. Retrieved July 23, 2013.
  24. ^ "Workers in Essential Industry "Frozen" in Employment". Labour Gazette. XLIII (10): 1333–1335. October 1943.
  25. ^ "Further Relaxation of Manpower Controls". Labour Gazette. XLV (9): 1276–1278. September 1945.
  26. ^ Byers 1996, p. 182.
  27. ^ Byers 1996, p. 186.
  28. ^ Byers 1996, p. 193.
  29. ^ a b Byers 1996, p. 202.
  30. ^ a b c Chartrand, René (2001). Canadian Forces In World War II. London: Osprey. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-84176-302-6.

Further reading

See also

This page was last edited on 20 January 2024, at 21:13
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.