Disaster risk reduction

Disaster risk reduction progress score for some countries in 2011. The score of 5 is best. Assessments include four indicators that reflect the degree to which countries have prioritised disaster risk reduction and the strengthening of relevant institutions.^[1]

Disaster risk reduction (DRR) (or disaster risk management) is an approach for planning and taking steps to make disasters less likely to happen, and less damaging when they do happen. DRR aims to make communities stronger (more resilient or less vulnerable) and better prepared to handle disasters. When DRR is successful, it decreases the vulnerability of communities because it mitigates the effects of disasters.^[2] This means DRR can reduce the severity and number of risky events. Since climate change can increase climate hazards, DRR and climate change adaptation are often looked at together in development efforts.^[3]

Most sectors of development and humanitarian work have potential for DRR initiatives to be included. People from local communities, agencies or federal governments can all propose DRR strategies. Policies for DRR intend to "define goals and objectives across different timescales and with concrete targets, indicators and time frames."^[2]^: 16

There are some challenges for successful DRR. Local communities and organisations should be actively involved in the planning process. The role and funding of local government needs to be considered. Also, DRR strategies should be mindful of gender aspects. For example, studies have shown that women and girls are disproportionately impacted by disasters.^[4] A gender-sensitive approach would identify how disasters affect men, women, boys and girls differently. It would shape policy that addresses people's specific vulnerabilities and needs.^[5]

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction is an international initiative that has helped 123 countries adopt both federal and local DRR strategies (as of 2022).^[6] The International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction, on October 13 every year, has helped increase the visibility of DRR. It aims to promote a culture of prevention.

Spending on DRR is difficult to quantify for many countries. Global estimates of costs are therefore not available. However an indication of the costs for developing countries is given by the $215 - US$387 billion per year (up to 2030) estimated costs for climate adaptation. DRR and climate adaptation share similar goals and strategies. They both require increased finance to address rising climate risks.^[7]^: 49

DRR activities are part of the national strategies and budget planning in most countries. However the priorities for DRR are often lower than for other development priorities. This has an impact on public sector budget allocations. For many countries, less than 1% of the national budget is available for DRR activities.^[7]^: 51 The Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) is a multi-donor partnership to support developing countries in managing the interconnected risks of natural hazards and climate hazards. Between 2007 and 2022, GFDRR provided $890 million in technical assistance, analytics, and capacity building support to more than 157 countries.^[7]^: 54

YouTube Encyclopedic

1/5
Views:
173 215
70 701
7 791
1 809
24 597

Transcription

Good morning everybody. It's my great pleasure to be here today and I would like to talk to you about resilience. This is a picture of my grandmother, my maternal grandmother, Nancy Staples and she's leaning on the gate at the end of our gardens and the land that we worked two generations ago. My earliest childhood memories are of her and my great grandmother and my grandfather particularly at this time of the year trying to eke out every ounce of nutricional value and economic value from our gardens and from the land. It was a time to harvest but it was a time to preserve, to jam, to pickle in any shape, way or form, that nutritional value so we could take the bounty of the summer and extend it for us, our family but also for the poorer members of he community around through the winter months. She was born at the beginning of one world war lived through a second, and survived polio. She was tough, and when I think about resilience I think about her, her generosity, her toughness and many like her in that generation. But let's talk about resilience today. This is a picture of the Hotel Montana taken in Port-au-Prince, Haiti just after the devastating earthquake in 2010. As you can see, it pancaked killing 200 people or more as it did so. It simply wasn't built to resist the shock. Today we have to be more concerned about natural disasters than ever before. In the past 30 years the economic losses from natural disasters have more than tripled. The number of natural disasters has actually doubled. Let's look at the numbers. Over the past 30 years, in low-income and middle-income countries alone we have lost 1.2 trillion dollars due to damage. That is equivalent to the GDP annually of Mexico. Another way to think of it is that it is equivalent to a third of all the official development assistance that we've given in the same time period. So think, that for every three dollars of overseas development aid that we've given, we've taken one and thrown it away. In the same period, the same 30 years, 2.3 million people have perished. That's the population of Namibia. This is something that we need to pay attention to. And it's getting more difficult. Climate change is ravaging especially poor countries. Already this is not a phenomena for the future, it's for us today. Already countries are trying to work their way through the complex nexus between a food crisis, a water crisis and an energy crisis and climate change is just making it more difficult and raising uncertainty. At the same time, over the next 40 years we will add 2.6 billion people to the cities of the world most of that in developing countries. In fact, 90% of that growth will be in South Asia and Africa. And, between now and 2050, we will double the number of people exposed to cyclones, and mudslides and collapse as a result of natural disasters in urban settings to more than 1.5 billion people. The lack of building codes, the lack of enforced building codes, will punish these people. And it will be the poor, for it is always the poor, the most vulnerable that will suffer most. So think of the story that we are beginning to understand. We have more and more disasters. Their intensity is being developed by climate change. Climate change is adding to uncertainty and we have a path of urbanization that this civilization has never seen before. How do we invest in our resilience? Well, there are two key ways. First of all, we actually have to change our growth path. We need to move to a greener and more inclusive growth now. Every country can start on that journey we must mitigate and adapt to climate change. At the same time, we need to invest in disaster risk management. Disaster risk management must be part of development. But it must also be considered a first line of defence against the uncertainty that is coming tomorrow. We need action in the public sector we need frameworks in public policy we need awareness and investment in the private sector and we need civil society and communities to engage. Now, I talked to you earlier on about the hotel in Haiti the Hotel Montana, that had pancaked, that had collapsed -- this is where we are today, this is the Westin in Sendai a gorgeous 37 storey hotel that survived the catastrophic earthquake on March 11th, 2011, the great Japan earthquake, with almost no damage at all. In fact it served as a disaster response centre. Disaster risk management is in the building code in Japan disaster risk management in the building code is enforced in Japan. Disaster risk management is part of the curricula in schools in Japan and disaster risk management, not disaster is part of the public discourse, here in Japan. So, every country, every government, can take steps now, no matter where they are on the development trajectory, to try to start to invest in their own resilience. But there is much more that can be done by the international community as well. Often, we offer too little, too late. Between 1980 and 2009, the international community spent 90 billion US dollars on disaster-related assistance. But of that 90 billion, only 3.6% was invested in prevention and preparedness. The other 96% plus was invested in emergency response and reconstruction. We have to change those numbers. We have to switch that graph around. In fact, we have to move from a tradition of response to a culture of prevention, a culture of resilience. But let me give you an example of what does seem to start working. This is the island of Saint Lucia, in the Caribbean a small island developing state buffeted by storms and hurricanes where landslides are, unfortunately far too often, part of the rhythm of life there. In 2008, the World Bank, working with 5 communities on the island started to try to invest in the resilience of these communities and their ability to withstand and to avoid landslides. And we built these hillside drains. In 2010, when Hurricane Tomas hit the island unfortunately many communities suffered the landslides that are so often part of the rhythm of life there but the five communities where these hillside drains had been built suffered no losses at all. It's important to understand the economics of this project as well. For every dollar that the community invested in these drains it saved another three dollars that it would have had to spend on response and on reconstruction if they had not taken the steps towards preparedness. So, if disaster risk resilience seems to make such economic and business sense is the private sector interested? Is the private sector investing? Well, the good news is that leaders are. This is a picture of the Port of Cartagena, in Colombia which is operated by a private firm, Muelles de Bosque on a long term government concession. Recently they undertook a study together with the International Finance Corporation the private sector lending arm of the World Bank where they looked at the risks to the port operating environment from changes in climate and changes in weather pattern. What was interesting was that in order to get the data for the report they had to go to 30 different public and private sources which shows that there is much to be done to make the data and awareness of these issues more available to public and private sector alike. But the report resulted in recommendations from changing the dredging regime for the way that ships approach the port to drainage to onside land operations. So, for example, changing the heights of roads and things like this. And as a result of those recommendations Muelles de Bosque invested 30 million dollars in new capital construction in order to make them more resilient in order to improve their operations going forward. So this port company was able to see the benefit from investing in their ability to be resilient going forward and that this was a commercial advantage to them. So I've talked about the public sector and I've talked about the private sector and now we need to talk about community. We know empirically that communities that have stronger social bonds do better in disaster. We know that in fact those strong social bonds are one of the strongest determinants of resilience within the community. I mean, it makes intuitive sense neighbours know which neighbour needs help which neighbour is vulnerable which neighbour is weakest. We also know that families, neighbours and friends are the ones that help reconstruct first after disaster has hit. And so when we think of resilience this is not an adapt construct it's not just a word that is thrown around in development circles. Resilience is, both, the need for public policy and the need for private investment. It's also about a different response from the international community and it is about the local municipal leaders the mayors that we elect to lead us through these uncertain times. But resilience, very importantly, is about community. I think the people of Japan know that. I think that my grandmother her friends and others in our community when I was growing up knew that too. And so, for me personally, when I think of resilience I think of top-down policy and investment flows but I think of bottom-up building of community. For me, resilience is about you and me and the bonds that bring us together. Thank you. (Applause)

Definitions and scope

Disaster risk reduction (DRR) is defined by United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) as those actions which aim to "prevent new and reducing existing disaster risk and managing residual risk, all of which contribute to strengthening resilience and therefore to the achievement of sustainable development".^[2]^: 16

Disaster risk is the potential loss of life, injury, or destroyed or damaged assets that could impact a society or community. Disaster risk results from the interaction of three factors: hazard(s), vulnerability and exposure.^[2]^: 14 This is illustrated in the risk equation.

Disaster risk reduction is extensive: Its scope is much broader and deeper than conventional emergency management. The objectives of DRR align with many sectors of development and humanitarian work.

DRR is such an all-embracing concept that it has proved difficult to define or explain in detail, although the broad idea is clear enough. It is generally understood to mean the broad development and application of policies, strategies, and practices to minimize vulnerabilities and disaster risks throughout society. Its policy goals and objectives are defined in disaster risk reduction strategies and plans.^[2]^: 16

The term disaster risk management (DRM) is often used in the same context and to mean much the same thing. That is a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and reducing risks associated with hazards and human activities. DRM is more properly applied to the operational aspects of DRR: the practical implementation of DRR initiatives.^[9] In other words, disaster risk reduction is the policy objective of disaster risk management.^[2]

Related concepts

Resilience

Resilience is scientifically defined as the efficiency with which a system can reduce the extent and duration of a disruption. The concept can take two forms: hard and soft resilience. Hard resilience refers to the strength of a structure to withstand pressure, while soft resilience is whether a system can recover from a disruptive event without changing its core function.^[10]

Alternatively, the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) defines resilience as “the ability of a system, community or society exposed to hazards to resist, absorb, accommodate to and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner, including through the preservation and restoration of its essential basic structures and functions.”^[11]

Vulnerability

According to the UNISDR, vulnerabilities are "the characteristics and circumstances of a community, system or asset that make it susceptible to the damaging effects of a hazard."^[11] The most vulnerable people or communities are those who have the most difficulties accessing resources they need to respond to an event.^[10]

Vulnerability plays a critical role in the analysis of risk, as the risk a structure faces is proportional to its level of vulnerability. Risk is often defined by the likelihood of an event occurring and the vulnerability of the community to that event.^[12] The more vulnerable the community, the more risk they face.

Mitigation

Mitigation is the action taken before an event to reduce any possible negative outcomes or harmful effects.^[12] Natural risk assessments commonly use the term mitigation, while broader climate change reports tend to use adaptive capacity instead (mitigation holds another definition in the scope of climate change).^[11] Although related, adaptive capacity refers more to the potential to adjust a system, while mitigation is the actual implementation of adjustments.^[12]

Mitigation is often used interchangeably with risk reduction, however the terms have a few key differences. Both aim to reduce the number of negative effects of hazards, but risk reduction focuses on reducing the likelihood of the event itself, while mitigation focuses on reducing the impact of the event.^[13]

Mitigation planning helps local governments lessen the impacts of hazards within their communities.^[14] No two locations have the same hazard risks and communities know their experiences best; for example, even if a hazard is not recorded in government data, locals will take note of anything that occurs in their neighborhood. Policymakers can use community input to create more efficient mitigation plans.^[14]

Climate change adaptation

Climate change, through rising temperatures, changing rainfall patterns, and increasing sea levels, affects the nature of hydro meteorological hazards that can give rise to a disaster. Examples of such hazards are droughts, floods, and cyclones. Research on climate change adaptation has been ongoing since the 1990s.^[15]

Climate change contributes to disaster risk. So experts sometimes see climate change adaptation as one of many processes within disaster risk reduction.^[16] In turn, disaster risk reduction is part of the broader consideration of sustainable development. Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction have similar goals (to reduce potential impacts of hazards and increase the resilience of people at risk). They use similar concepts and are informed by similar sources and studies.^[17]

Disasters are often triggered by natural hazards. A natural event such as a fire or flood is not of itself a disaster: it's only when it affects people or is caused by them that is counts as a disaster. It is argued that natural disasters are always linked to human action or inaction or rooted in anthropogenic processes. Disasters, economic loss, and the underlying vulnerabilities that drive risk are increasing. Global risks like climate change are having major impacts everywhere.^[18] Scientists forecast climate change will increase the frequency and severity of extreme weather events and disasters. So adaptation may include measures to increase preparedness and relevant disaster response capacities.^{[citation needed]}

International governance

Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

The Sendai Framework places the responsibility of reducing disaster risk primarily on federal governments through seven targets divided into two categories: substantial reductions and increases. It aims to reduce disaster mortality, people affected, economic loss, and damage to infrastructure and services. The remaining targets work to increase access to warning systems, aid to developing countries, and the number of countries with disaster risk reduction strategies.^[19] Since the adoption of the Sendai Framework in 2015, the number of countries with national DRR strategies has increased dramatically, from 55 to 123 countries in 2022.^[6]^: 22

The framework also details four priorities for action to be accomplished by 2030:^[19]

Understanding disaster risk
Strengthening disaster risk governance
Investing in disaster risk reduction
Enhancing disaster preparedness

These priorities acknowledge current shortcomings of DRR efforts, such as the lack of communication between local and federal governments and private programs, as well inequities faced by women and people with disabilities in the realm of disaster response.

Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery

The Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) is a global partnership program established on September 29, 2006, to support developing countries on disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. The facility is administered by the World Bank and governed by a Consultative Group including the World Bank Group, the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and several other international organizations and countries.^[20]

GFDRR was initially launched to support the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 (HFA)^[21] approved during the Second World Conference on Disaster Reduction in 2005. On March 18, 2015, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (Sendai Framework) was adopted. GFDRR now supports the implementation of this framework.

International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction

The United Nations General Assembly designated October 13th as the International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction (IDDRR) to encourage citizens and governments alike to foster more disaster-resilient communities. The day was created in 1989 as part of the United Nations' proclamation of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Originally, the IDDRR was on the second Wednesday of October and intended to highlight the goals of the decade for disaster reduction.^[22] In 2009 the day was officially set as October 13, rather than the second Wednesday of the month.^[23]

The IDDRR supports the themes of the Sendai Framework, especially after the Midterm Review of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. The 2023 IDDRR, just months after this report, intended to bolster the framework's new plan for accelerated disaster resistance by highlighting inequalities in disaster preparedness. The 2023 IDDRR used the tagline "Fighting Inequality for a Resilient Future" and hashtags #ResilienceForAll, #BreakTheCycle, and #DDRDay to spread awareness on social media.^[24]

Sustainable Development Goals

In 2015 the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted as part of the broad intergovernmental agreement on development to 2030. Many of these objectives tie directly into disaster risk reduction, and sustainable development plans often mention DRR.^[25]

DRR is applicable and relevant to several of the Sustainable Development Goals:^[25]

SDG11 (sustainable cities and communities) lists DRR as a means of implementation. Targets 11.5 and 11.B call for more investment into disaster risk resilience strategies and policies, and 11.B aims to assess DRR strategies in accordance with the Sendai Framework.^[26]
SDG13 (climate action) also uses DRR as a means of implementation. Target 13.1 aims to strengthen resilience to climate related hazards, and measures the number of local and federal governments who have adopted DRR strategies.^[27]
Numerous other SDGs also rely on DRR strategies as an interdisciplinary method of achieving their goals. For example, SDG9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure) aims to build infrastructure that is resilient to hazards, and SDG1 (to end poverty) asserts that many impoverished people have the highest vulnerability to disasters.^[25] DRR implementation has long lasting effects on a wide range of social issues due to these related factors.

Issues and challenges

Communities and their organizations

Traditional emergency management thinking makes two misleading assumptions about communities. First, it sees other forms of social organisation (voluntary and community-based organisations, informal social groupings and families) as irrelevant to emergency action. Spontaneous actions by affected communities or groups (e.g., search and rescue) are viewed as irrelevant or disruptive, because they are not controlled by the authorities. The second assumption is that disasters produce passive 'victims' who are overwhelmed by crisis or dysfunctional behavior (panic, looting, self-seeking activities) and need to be controlled — in some cases, through the imposition of martial law. ^[28]^[29]

An alternative viewpoint emphasises the importance of communities and local organisations in disaster risk management. In this strategy, local people and organisations are the main actors in risk reduction and disaster response. Community-based disaster risk management responds to local problems and needs, capitalises on local knowledge and expertise, is cost-effective, improves the likelihood of sustainability through genuine 'ownership' of projects, strengthens community technical and organisational capacities, and empowers people by enabling them to tackle these and other challenges.^[30] Understanding the social capital already existent in the community can greatly help reducing the risk at the community level.^[31]^[32]

Low community involvement can increase the severity of disaster.^[33] Community volunteers provide crucial resources to recovery efforts, such as access to communication, search and rescue efforts, supply distribution, housing and food provision, and technological assistance.^[33]^[34] Government agencies rarely "consider the needs and desires of communities" or ask for community input when implementing their DRR strategies.^[34] A case study in Rwanda showed that only 14.7% of policy utilised "community's traditional knowledge" when creating plans, despite expressed interest from the community.^[33]

Governance

In most countries, risk management is decentralised to local governments. In urban areas, the most widely used tool is the local development plan (municipal, comprehensive or general plan), followed by emergency and risk reduction plans that local governments are required to adopt by law and are updated every 4–5 years.^[35] In many contexts, especially South of the Sahara, this process clashes with the lack of funds or mechanisms for transferring resources from the central to the local budget.^[36]

Gender

Disaster risk is not gender-neutral. Studies have shown that women and girls are disproportionately impacted by disasters. Following the 2004 tsunami in the Indian Ocean, 77% and 72% of the deaths in the districts of North Aceh and Aceh Besar, Indonesia, were female. And in India 62% of people who died were female.^[4] This is due to socially-constructed gender roles that determine what norms and behaviors are acceptable for women and men, and girls and boys. In particular, women tend to take responsibility for home-based tasks and can be reluctant to leave their assets in the case of hazard warning; and often do not learn survival skills that can help in disasters, such as learning to swim or climb.

A gender-sensitive approach would identify how disasters affect men, women, boys and girls differently and shape policy that addresses people's specific vulnerabilities, concerns and needs.^[5]

Cost and financing

Costs

The economic costs of climate-related disasters are on the rise. Recent global costs have averaged above US$330 billion/year (over 2015-2021).^[7]^: 21The insurance sector estimated that weather- and climate-related disasters contributed to $165 billion of economic losses worldwide in 2018 and $210 billion in 2020.^[37] ^[7]^: 50 These figures are likely to be underestimates because of under-reporting and technical difficulties in estimating losses. Disaster risks are expected to significantly increase in future and may have cascading economic impacts, including on the financial system and repayment of national debts.^[7]^: 49

Spending on DRR has proved difficult to quantify for many countries. Global estimates of costs are therefore not available. However an indication of the costs for developing countries is given by the $215 - US$387 billion per year (up to 2030) estimated costs for climate adaptation. DRR and climate adaptation share similar goals and strategies and governing entities have similar mandates including advocating for increased finance to address climate risks.^[7]^: 49

DRR activities are part of the national strategies and budget planning in most countries. However the priorities for DRR are often lower than for other development priorities. This has an impact on public sector budget allocations. For many countries, less than 1% of the national budget is available for DRR activities.^[7]^: 51 This can lead to an over-reliance on international development funding for some activities, which may not align fully with national priorities and needs. Other barriers include complex application processes and strict eligibility requirements that hamper access to international funding.^[7]^: 51

Financing needs and finance flows

Only around 90% of international funding for DRR is currently spent on responding to and recovering from disasters, rather than managing their future risks. Most of this funding is spent on the settlements, infrastructure and service development sectors. Moreover, only a very small percentage, around 0.5%, of total international development aid is currently spent on the pre-disaster phase of disaster risk reduction.^[7]^: 50 This is despite the finding that every dollar spent on risk reduction saves between $5 and $10 in economic losses from disasters.^[38] A case study of Niger showed positive cost and benefit results for preparedness spending across 3 different scenarios (from the absolute level of disaster loss, to the potential reduction in disaster loss and the discount rate), estimating that every $1 spent results in $3.25 to $5.31 of benefit.^[39]

The Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) is a multi-donor partnership supporting low and middle-income countries in managing paired risks of natural hazards and climate change. Between 2007 and 2022, GFDRR provided $890 million in technical assistance, analytics, and capacity building support to more than 157 countries. For example, GFDRR supported Maputo, Mozambique to develop detailed vulnerability maps to inform government funding decisions.^[7]^: 54 In 2022, the GFDRR committed $21.1 million in new grants and $3.3 million in additional funds to scale up existing activities.^[40] GFDRR also works to mobilise additional funding through the World Bank and other development banks' engagement. It estimates that each dollar of GFDRR financing influences at least 100 dollars in climate resilient development impact.^[40]

Innovations in financing DRR include the establishment of risk disclosure initiatives to understand whether companies are managing their exposure to disaster risks. They include regulatory frameworks to incentivise private investments in risk reduction and resilience. There has also been innovation in new financing instruments such as resilience bonds and use of green bonds.^[7]^: 49

History

Disaster risk reduction has been strongly influenced by mapping of natural disaster risks and research on vulnerability since the mid-1970s.^[41]^[42]

Disaster management thinking and practice since the 1970s has included more focus on understanding why disasters happen. It has also focused on actions that can reduce risk before a disaster occurs. This has put more emphasis on mitigation and preparedness in addition to the response and recovery phases of disasters. It has been widely embraced by governments, disaster planners and civil society organisations.^[43]

There have been growing calls for greater clarity about components of DRR and about indicators of progress toward resilience — a challenge that the international community took up at the UN's World Conference on Disaster Reduction (WCDR) in Kobe, Japan, in 2005, only days after the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake. The WCDR began the process of pushing international agencies and national governments beyond the vague rhetoric of most policy statements and toward setting clear targets and commitments for DRR.

The first step of the WCDR's process was formally approving the Hyogo Framework for Action (2005–2015) (HFA). The HFA was the first internationally accepted framework for DRR. It set out an ordered sequence of objectives (outcome – strategic goals – priorities), with five priorities for action attempting to 'capture' the main areas of DRR intervention. The UN's biennial Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction^[44] provided an opportunity for the UN and its member states to review progress against the Hyogo Framework. It held its first session 5–7 June 2007 in Geneva, Switzerland, where UNISDR is based. The subsequent Global Platforms were held in June 2009, May 2011 and May 2013, all in Geneva.

Subtitled "Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters," the HFA emphasises how resilience to hazards is needed for community development and planning.^[45]

International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (1990s)

The United Nations General Assembly designated the 1990s an International decade for natural disaster reduction. The United Nations' Secretary-General had been tasked with overseeing research into the relationship between disasters and development, and in 1987 reported that there was room for improvement from the international community.^[46] Due to the increasing numbers of international deaths and damages due to climate related hazards, especially in developing countries, the United Nations believed dedicating a decade to the topic would substantially improve policies at local, regional, and federal levels.

The 1987 General Assembly session proposed 5 goals to guide policy efforts:^[46]

Improve the capacity to mitigate effects of natural disasters, especially in developing countries
Devise plans to apply preexisting knowledge of disasters from diverse perspectives
Foster programs aimed to close knowledge gaps
Disseminate information about current measures being applied
Develop programs to prevent and mitigate disasters specific to each hazard and location

Before the start of the decade in 1989, The General Assembly discussed plans for the decade in more detail and created the International Framework of Action for the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction.^[22] This framework restates the goals, and adds further guidelines for national governments, the United Nations Systems, and the Secretary-General to follow.

Federal governments were encouraged to participate in the decade, formulate national mitigation programs, create scientific committees, encourage local action, inform the Secretary-General of their actions, increase public awareness, monitor the impact of disasters on health care, and improve availability of emergency supplies.^[22] The proposed role of the United Nations System focused on holding countries accountable for these goals, as well as providing resources or policy plans countries may need for implementation. However, many of the tasks given to the United Nations fall to the Secretary-General.

During the 1990s, there were three Secretary-Generals: Javier Pérez de Cuéllar, Boutros Boutros-Ghalil, and Koji Annan.^[47] Over the decade, these secretaries were tasked with establishing and leading a number of committees for the decade, including a scientific and technical committee on the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction, a special high-level council to provide general advice and promote awareness, and a secratariat that would handle daily activities and support the other committees.^[22] These groups, as well as leaders of each country, would report their progress to the Secretary-General, who would oversee all progress and report to the General Assembly every two years on the progress of the decade's goals.

Examples

Bangladesh

Based on the Climate Risk Index,^[48] Bangladesh is one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world. Bangladesh is highly vulnerable to different types of disasters because of climatic variability, extreme events, high population density, high incidence of poverty and social inequity, poor institutional capacity, inadequate financial resources, and poor infrastructure.^[49] Bangladesh commenced its disaster preparedness following the cyclone of 1991 and has now a comprehensive National Plan for Disaster Management which provides mechanisms at both national and sub-national levels.^[50]

European Union

In addition to providing funding to humanitarian aid, the European Commission's Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG-ECHO) is in charge of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism ^[51] to coordinate the response to disasters in Europe and beyond and contributes to at least 75% of the transport and/or operational costs of deployments. Established in 2001, the Mechanism fosters cooperation among national civil protection authorities across Europe. Currently 34 countries are members of the Mechanism; all 27 EU Member States in addition to Iceland, Norway, Serbia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Turkey and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Mechanism was set up to enable coordinated assistance from the participating states to victims of natural and man-made disasters in Europe and elsewhere.

United States

The United States has a government organization designated to address emergency management. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) created a model to measure hazardous events. This assessment plan, the FEMA model, uses history, vulnerability, maximum threat, and probability of each potential disaster to predict potential damage. Each hazard is then given a rating on the scale using these criteria and comparisons to other hazards to determine the priority of mitigation efforts.^[52]

As of May 2023, FEMA has updated their Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, which provides a framework for local governments to follow in the case of hazardous events. This strategy contains 4 steps: organise resources, assess risks, develop mitigation strategies, and implement plans.^[14] These steps are broad, as they are designed to be applied to a wide variety of hazards. FEMA also has more specific policy plans, such as their Hazard Mitigation Field Book (HMFB) on Roadways. This document focuses on preventing road erosion, inundation, and debris pileup caused by damaged culverts, embankments, and road surfaces. The HMFB uses a project identification diagram to realise each issue and a selection matrix to match that problem with an effective solution using duration, feasibility, design, and environmental considerations.^[53]

FEMA's Mitigation Directorate^[54] is responsible for programs that take action before a disaster, in order to identify risks and reduce injuries, loss of property, and recovery time.^[55] The agency has major analysis programs for floods, hurricanes and tropical storms, dams, and earthquakes.^[55]^[56]

Pre-Disaster Mitigation grants are available to acquire property for conversion to open space, retrofit existing buildings, construct tornado and storm shelters, manage vegetation for erosion and fire control, and small flood control projects.^[57] Critics say this program is underperforming because it is starved for funding compared to disaster response and recovery, the process of applying for a buyout is unreasonably slow, and is wasting taxpayer dollars because the National Flood Insurance Program has paid to reconstruct some properties up to 18 times.^[58] 1% of NFIP-insured properties are responsible for more than one quarter of the money the program has paid out.^[59]

References

^ "Disaster risk reduction progress score". Our World in Data. Retrieved 2024-04-04.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f UNGA (2016). Report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert working group on indicators and terminology for disaster risk reduction. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).
^ McBean, Gordon; Rodgers, Caroline (2010). "Climate hazards and disasters: the need for capacity building". WIREs Climate Change. 1 (6): 871–884. doi:10.1002/wcc.77. ISSN 1757-7780.
^ ^a ^b Neumayer, Eric; Plümper, Thomas (2007). "The Gendered Nature of Natural Disasters: The Impact of Catastrophic Events on the Gender Gap in Life Expectancy, 1981–2002". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 97 (3): 551–566. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00563.x. ISSN 0004-5608.
^ ^a ^b Le Masson, Virginie; Langston, Lara (March 2014). "How Should the new international disaster risk framework address gender equality?" (PDF). Overseas Development Institute.
^ ^a ^b UNDRR (2023). The Report of the Midterm Review of the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR: Geneva, Switzerland.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l UNDRR (2023). The Report of the Midterm Review of the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR: Geneva, Switzerland.
^ Gill, J.C., Duncan, M., Ciurean, R., Smale, L., Stuparu, D., Schlumberger, J, de Ruiter M., Tiggeloven, T., Torresan, S., Gottardo, S., Mysiak, J., Harris, R., Petrescu, E. C., Girard, T., Khazai, B., Claassen, J., Dai, R., Champion, A., Daloz, A. S., ... Ward, P. 2022. MYRIAD-EU D1.2 Handbook of Multi-hazard, Multi-Risk Definitions and Concepts. H2020 MYRIAD-EU Project, grant agreement number 101003276, pp 75.
^ "Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)". WMO Community Platform. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). n.d. Retrieved May 29, 2022. Disaster risk management (DRM) comprises processes and actions to achieve [DRR] objective[s]
^ ^a ^b Proag, Virenda (2014). "The concept of vulnerability and resilience". Procedia Economics and Finance. 18: 369–376.
^ ^a ^b ^c United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2009). 2009 UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. United Nations.
^ ^a ^b ^c Emanoel Omena Monte, Benício, Joel Avrush Goldenfum, Gean Paulo Miche, and José Rafael de Albuquerque Cavalcanti. January, 2021. “Terminology of natural hazards and disasters: A review and the case of Brazil.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol 52.
^ "Risk reduction". International Risk Management Institute IRMI. Retrieved October 20, 2023.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Local Mitigation Planning Handbook" (PDF). Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA. 2023.
^ Ara Begum, R., R. Lempert, E. Ali, T.A. Benjaminsen, T. Bernauer, W. Cramer, X. Cui, K. Mach, G. Nagy, N.C. Stenseth, R. Sukumar, and P. Wester, 2022: Chapter 1: Point of Departure and Key Concepts. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 121–196, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.003.
^ Kelman, Ilan; Gaillard, J C; Mercer, Jessica (March 2015). "Climate Change's Role in Disaster Risk Reduction's Future: Beyond Vulnerability and Resilience". International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 6 (1): 21–27. Bibcode:2015IJDRS...6...21K. doi:10.1007/s13753-015-0038-5. ISSN 2095-0055.
^ "Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation — IPCC". Retrieved 2022-11-16.
^ Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022. Our world at risk transforming governance for a resilient future. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022. ISBN 978-92-1-232028-1. OCLC 1337569431.
^ ^a ^b "What is the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction?" United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Retrieved October 12, 2022.
^ "Overview". World Bank. Archived from the original on 2021-03-22. Retrieved 2021-03-13.
^ "Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-06-13. Retrieved 2021-03-13.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly Session 44 Resolution 236. International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction A/RES/44/236 22 December 1989. Retrieved October 17, 2023.
^ United Nations General Assembly Session 64 Resolution 200. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction A/64/200 21 December 2009. Retrieved October 17, 2023.
^ "Concept Note: International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction 2023". United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2023.
^ ^a ^b ^c "The 17 Goals". United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved 22 October 2023.
^ "Issue Brief SDG 11" (PDF). United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations.
^ "The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2022: Climate Action" (PDF). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNSD). 2022.
^ § Quarantelli EL 1998, Major Criteria for Judging Disaster Planning and Managing and their Applicability in Developing Societies (University of Delaware: Disaster Research Center, Preliminary Paper 268).
^ § Dynes RR 1994, 'Community Emergency Planning: False Assumptions and Inappropriate Analogies'. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 12(2): 141–158.
^ § Maskrey A 1989, Disaster Mitigation: A Community-Based Approach (Oxford: Oxfam).
^ Aldrich, Daniel P.; Meyer, Michelle A. (February 2015). "Social Capital and Community Resilience". American Behavioral Scientist. 59 (2): 254–269. doi:10.1177/0002764214550299. S2CID 145471345.
^ Sanyal, Saswata; Routray, Jayant Kumar (2016-08-27). "Social capital for disaster risk reduction and management with empirical evidences from Sundarbans of India". International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 19: 101–111. Bibcode:2016IJDRR..19..101S. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.010.
^ ^a ^b ^c Nahayo, Lamek; Mupenzi, Christophe; Kayiranga, Alphonse; Karamage, Fidele; Ndayisaba, Felix; Nyesheja, Enan Muhire; Li, Lanhai (2017). "Early alert and community involvement: approach for disaster risk reduction in Rwanda". Natural Hazards. 86 (2): 505–517. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2702-5. ISSN 0921-030X.
^ ^a ^b Satizábal, Paula; Cornes, Isabel; de Lourdes Melo Zurita, María; Cook, Brian R. (January 2022). "The power of connection: Navigating the constrains of community engagement for disaster risk reduction". International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 68 (102699) – via Science Direct.
^ Tiepolo, Maurizio (2017). Relevance and Quality of Climate Planning for Large and Medium-Sized Cities of the Tropics. Green Energy and Technology. Cham: Springer. pp. 199–226. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59096-7_10. ISBN 978-3-319-59096-7.
^ Tiepolo, Maurizio and Braccio, Sarah (2020). "Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into Local Development Plans for Rural Tropical Africa: A Systematic Assessment". Sustainability. 12 (2196): 2196. doi:10.3390/su12062196.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ "Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2018: "secondary" perils on the frontline" (PDF). SwissRe Institute SIGMA. 2019.
^ "A Needless Toll of Natural Disasters", Op-Ed, Boston Globe, 23 March 2006, by Eric Schwartz (UN Secretary General's Deputy Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery
^ Dare to prepare: taking risk seriously Archived 2013-12-13 at the Wayback Machine Kellett, J. and Peters, K. (2013) Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved 10 December 2013
^ ^a ^b GFDRR (2023) GFDRR Annual Report 2022. February 28, 2023
^ Shi, Peijun; Kasperson, Roger, eds. (2015). "World Atlas of Natural Disaster Risk". IHDP/Future Earth-Integrated Risk Governance Project Series. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45430-5. ISBN 978-3-662-45429-9. ISSN 2363-4979. S2CID 199492512.
^ Blaikie, Piers; Cannon, Terry; Davis, Ian; Wisner, Ben (2004). At Risk: Natural hazards, people's risk and disasters (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415252157.
^ § UN ISDR 2004, Living with Risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives (Geneva: UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), [1]
^ "Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction". Archived from the original on November 9, 2018.
^ UNISDR. (2012) Towards a post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
^ ^a ^b United Nations General Assembly Session 42 Resolution 169. International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction A/RES/42/169 (1987) Retrieved October 18, 2023.
^ "UN Secretariat Documentation". Dag Hammarskjöld Library. October 4, 2023. Retrieved October 18, 2023.
^ Eckstein, David, V. Künzel, L. Schäfer and M. Winges (2019). "GLOBAL CLIMATE RISK INDEX 2020 Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events? Weather-Related Loss Events in 2018 and 1999 to 2018" (PDF). Retrieved Nov 27, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Shaw, Rajib; Islam, Aminul; Mallick, Fuad (2013), Shaw, Rajib; Mallick, Fuad; Islam, Aminul (eds.), "National Perspectives of Disaster Risk Reduction in Bangladesh", Disaster Risk Reduction Approaches in Bangladesh, Tokyo: Springer Japan, pp. 45–62, doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54252-0_3, ISBN 978-4-431-54252-0, retrieved 2020-11-27
^ Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief: National Plan for Disaster Management (2016-2020) Building Resilience for Sustainable Human Development
^ "EU Civil Protection Mechanism". European Commission. Archived from the original on 2015-03-10. Retrieved 2021-07-28.
^ Yanilmaz, Sumeyye; Baskak, Dilber; Yucesan, Melih; Gul, Muhammet (December 2021). "Extension of FEMA and SMUG models with Bayesian best-worst method for disaster risk reduction". International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 66 (102631) – via Science Direct.
^ "Hazard Mitigation Field Handbook: Roadways" (PDF). Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA. 2010.
^ "Mitigation". Federal Emergency Management Agency. Archived July 1, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
^ ^a ^b "FEMA's Mitigation Directorate Fact Sheet". Federal Emergency Management Agency.
^ HAZUS Archived July 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine is a computer model for hurricane, earthquake, and flood damage estimates.
^ "Grant Program Comparison: Mitigation Division Grant Programs". Archived October 10, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
^ Debt-Laden FEMA Is Slow To Act On Program That Buys Flooded Houses
^ Planet Money – Episode 797: Flood Money

External links

Disasters

Overview

Disasters

Natural disasters – list by death toll

Geological

Mass wasting	Landslide Avalanche Mudflow Debris flow
Earthquake (List)	Seismic hazard Seismic risk Soil liquefaction
Volcano eruption	Pyroclastic flow Lahar Volcanic ash
Natural erosion	Sinkhole

Hydrological

Flood (List)	Coastal flood Flash flood Storm surge
Other	Tsunami Megatsunami Limnic eruption

Meteorological

Temperature	Blizzard Cold wave Ice storm Heat wave
Drought	Megadrought
Cyclonic storms	Bomb cyclone Thunderstorm (Hail) Tornado (Tornado outbreak) Tropical cyclone
Other	Derecho Wildfire Firestorm ARkStorm

Astronomical

Unrelated to natural hazards

Accidents

Transport	Rail Maritime Shipwreck Air Spaceflight
Industrial	Structural failures and collapses Bridge Dam Nuclear by death toll Civilian radiation Civilian nuclear Military nuclear Oil spills Levee breach Mast and tower Infrastructure
Health	Famine List Famine scales Epidemic list Pandemic

Man-made

Preparation

Countermeasures

Media

Disaster film (List of disaster films)

Organizations

WikiProject

This page was last edited on 29 April 2024, at 10:29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia