To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clactonian
Clactonian Flake Tool from Rickson’s Farm pit, Swanscombe, Kent, UK.
Clactonian Flake Tool from Rickson’s Farm pit, Swanscombe, Kent, UK.
Geographical rangeEngland
PeriodLower Paleolithic
Datesc. 424,000 – c. 400,000 BP
Type siteClacton-on-Sea
Major sitesBarnham, Nile, Swanscombe Heritage Park
Preceded byAcheulean
Followed byMousterian

The Clactonian is the name given by archaeologists to an industry of European flint tool manufacture that dates to the early part of the interglacial period known as the Hoxnian, the Mindel-Riss or the Holstein stages (c. 400,000 years ago). Clactonian tools were made by Homo heidelbergensis.[1]

It is named after 400,000-year-old finds made by Hazzledine Warren in a palaeochannel at Clacton-on-Sea in the English county of Essex in 1911. The artifacts found there included flint chopping tools, flint flakes and the tip of a worked wooden shaft along with the remains of a giant elephant and hippopotamus. Further examples of the tools have been found at sites including Barnfield Pit and Rickson's Pit,[2] near Swanscombe in Kent and Barnham in Suffolk; similar industries have been identified across Northern Europe. The Clactonian industry involved striking thick, irregular flakes from a core of flint, which was then employed as a chopper. The flakes would have been used as crude knives or scrapers. Unlike the Oldowan tools from which Clactonian ones derived, some were notched, implying that they were attached to a handle or shaft. Retouch is uncommon and the prominent bulb of percussion on the flakes indicates use of a hammerstone.

An "Egyptian version" of the Clactonian industry was proposed in 1972, based on excavations on the banks of the Nile River, at the 100 foot terrace.[3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    6 303
    1 532
    419
  • Lower paleolithic culture- clactonian and levalloisian (Pre-historic archaeology)
  • Tools Technique- Clactonian, levalloisian technique |for NET/JRF, UPSC, BPSC,UPPSC Lecture- 6
  • Tools of Clactonian Technique |#shorts |Stone Age For NET/JRF,UPSC,UPPSC,BPSC,MPPSC & All state PCS

Transcription

The Clactonian controversy

The Clactonian industry may have co-existed with the Acheulean industry, which used identical basic techniques but which also had handaxe technology; tools made by bifacially working a flint core.

The justification for considering "Clactonian" as a tradition distinct from Acheulean has been called into question in a 1994 article. The Clactonian industry may in fact be the same thing as the Acheulean and only assessed as being different due to its tools being Acheulean ones made by individuals who had no need for handaxes on the occasion that they made them. Differences in environment and the availability and quality of local raw materials may account for the differences between the two industries, which, at one point it was inferred, were only perceived by modern archaeologists.[4]

However, the 2004 excavation of a butchered Pleistocene elephant at the Southfleet Road site of High Speed 1 in Kent recovered numerous Clactonian flint tools but no handaxes. As a handaxe would have been more useful than a chopper in dismembering an elephant carcass it is considered strong evidence of the Clactonian being a separate industry. Flint of sufficient quality was available in the area and it is likely that the people who carved up the elephant did not possess the knowledge to make the more advanced bifacial handaxe.[citation needed] Proponents[who?] of the Clactonian as an independent industry point to the lack of concrete evidence in favour of it being an anomalous Acheulean industry. The precise provenance of the few attributed bifacial Clactonian tools (which point to Acheulean influence) is in dispute.[citation needed]

The traditional chronology of Clactonian being followed by Acheulean is also being increasingly challenged[by whom?] since finds of Acheulean tools were made at Boxgrove in Sussex and High Lodge in Suffolk. [citation needed] These finds came from deposits connected with the Anglian Stage, the glaciation that preceded the Hoxnian Stage and therefore would have preceded the Clactonian. Whether or not they are separate industries it would seem that the 'Clactonian' and 'Acheulean' stone tool makers would have had cultural contact with each other.

Map of England showing important sites of the Clactonian industry (clickable map).

See also

References

  1. ^ Ashton, Nick (2017). Early Humans. London: William Collins. p. 145-47, 314. ISBN 978-0-00-815035-8.
  2. ^ Tester, P. J. (1984). "Clactonian Flints from Rickson's Pit, Swanscombe". Archaeologia Cantiana. 100. Kent Archaeological Society: 15–28. Retrieved 12 July 2016. Open access icon
  3. ^ Langer, William L., ed. (1972). An Encyclopedia of World History (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. p. 9. ISBN 0-395-13592-3.
  4. ^ Ashton, N.; McNabb, J.; et al. Contemporaneity of Clactonian and Acheulian flint industries at Barnham, Suffolk in Antiquity 68 (1994), 260. pp. 585–589.

Further reading

  • Butler, C, Prehistoric Flintwork, Tempus : Strood, 2005

External links

This page was last edited on 13 April 2024, at 20:46
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.