To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

British American Land Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British American Land Company (BALC) was a company formed in 1832 for the purpose of purchasing land and encouraging British immigration to Lower Canada. It was founded and promoted by John Galt, Edward Ellice[a] and others to acquire and manage the development of almost 1,100,000 acres (1,719 sq mi; 4,452 km2) of Crown land and other lands in the Eastern Townships of Lower Canada, in order to encourage the immigration of British subjects to the region.

In comparison to the Canada Company, a similar enterprise in Upper Canada that thrived through collaboration with the local government, the BALC indulged in land speculation, made immigration a secondary priority, and struggled throughout its existence.[2]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    4 414 231
    303
    2 226
    162 105
    1 963
  • When is Thanksgiving? Colonizing America: Crash Course US History #2
  • David Thompson explorer
  • American Voices / Hard Times 03 - Hard Times on the Land
  • CHRISTMAS SPECIAL - Bastogne 1944 - The Forgotten Flying Heroes
  • Ch. 12 - The Second War for Independence

Transcription

Hi I’m John Green, this is Crash Course US History and today we're going to tell the story of how a group of plucky English people struck a blow for religious freedom and founded the greatest, freest and fattest nation the world has ever seen. These Brits entered a barren land containing no people and quickly invented the automobile, baseball and Star Trek and we all lived happily ever after. Mr. Green, Mr. Green, if it is really that simple, I am so getting an A in this class. Oh, me from the past, you're just a delight. [INTRO] So most Americans grew up hearing that the United States was founded by pasty English people who came here to escape religious persecution, and that's true of the small proportion of people who settled in the Massachusetts Bay and created what we now know is New England. But these Pilgrims and Puritans, there's a difference, weren’t the first people or even the first Europeans to come to the only part of the globe we didn't paint over. In fact they weren’t the first English people. The first English people came to Virginia. Off topic but how weird is it that the first permanent English colony in the Americas was named not for Queen Elizabeth’s epicness but for her supposedly chastity. Right anyway, those first English settlers weren't looking for religious freedom, they wanted to get rich. The first successful English colony in America was founded in Jamestown, Virginia in 1607. I say "successful" because there were two previous attempts to colonize the region. They were both epic failures. The more famous of which was the colony of Roanoke Island set up by Sir Walter Raleigh which is famous because all the colonists disappeared leaving only the word Croatoan on carved into a tree. Jamestown was a project of the Virginia Company which existed to make money for its investors, something it never did. The hope was that they would find gold in the Chesapeake region like the Spanish had in South America, so there were a disproportionate number of goldsmiths and jewelers there to fancy up that gold which of course did not exist. Anyway, it turns out that jewelers dislike farming so much so that Captain John Smith who soon took over control of the island once said that they would rather starve than farm. So in the first year, half of the colonists died. Four hundred replacements came, but, by 1610, after a gruesome winter called the starving time, the number of colonists had dwindled to sixty-five. And eventually word got out that the new world’s one-year survival rate was like twenty percent and it became harder to find new colonists. But 1618, a Virginia company hit upon a recruiting strategy called the head right system which offered fifty acres of land for each person that a settler paid to bring over, and this enabled the creation of a number of large estates which were mostly worked on and populated by indentured servants. Indentured servants weren't quite slaves, but they were kind of temporary slaves, like they could be bought and sold and they had to do what their masters commanded. But after seven to ten years of that, if they weren't dead, they were paid their freedom dues which they hoped would allow them to buy farms of their own. Sometimes that worked out, but often either the money wasn't enough to buy a farm or else they were too dead to collect it. Even more ominously in 1619, just twelve years after the founding of Jamestown the first shipment of African slaves arrived in Virginia. So the colony probably would have continued to struggle along if they hadn't found something that people really loved: tobacco. Tobacco had been grown in Mexico since at least 1000 BCE, but the Europeans had never seen it and it proved to be kind of a "thank you for the small pox; here's some lung cancer” gift from the natives. Interestingly King James hated smoking. He called it “a custom loathsome to the eye and hateful to the nose" but he loved him some tax revenue, and nothing sells like drugs. By 1624 Virginia was producing more than 200,000 pounds of tobacco per year. By the 1680s, more than 30 million pounds per year. Tobacco was so profitable the colonists created huge plantations with very little in the way of towns or infrastructure to hold the social order together, a strategy that always works out brilliantly. The industry also structured Virginian society. First off, most of the people who came in the 17th century, three-quarters of them were servants .So Virginia to give a microcosm of England: a small class of wealthy landowners sitting atop a mass of servants. That sounds kind of dirty but it was mostly just sad. The society was also overwhelmingly male; because male servants were more useful in the tobacco fields, they were the greatest proportion of immigrants. In fact they outnumbered women five to one. The women who did come over were mostly indentured servants, and if they were to marry, which they often did because they were in great demand, they had to wait until their term of service was up. This meant delayed marriage which meant fewer children which further reduced the number of females. Life was pretty tough for these women, but on the upside Virginia was kind of a swamp of pestilence, so their husbands often died, and this created a small class of widows or even unmarried women who, because of their special status, could make contracts and own property, so that was good, sort of. Ok. So a quick word about Maryland. Maryland was the second Chesapeake Colony, founded in 1632, and by now there was no messing around with joint stock companies. Maryland was a proprietorship: a massive land grant to a single individual named Cecilius Calvert. Calvert wanted to turn Maryland into like a medieval feudal kingdom to benefit himself and his family, and he was no fan of the representational institutions that were developing in Virginia. Also Calvert was Catholic, and Catholics were welcome in Maryland which wasn't always the case elsewhere. Speaking of which, let's talk about Massachusetts. So Jamestown might have been the first English colony, but Massachusetts Bay is probably better known. This is a largely because the colonists who came there were so recognizable for their beliefs and also for their hats. That’s right. I’m talking about the Pilgrims and the Puritans. And no, I will not be talking about Thanksgiving... is a lie. I can’t help myself, but only to clear up the difference between Pilgrims and Puritans and also to talk about Squanto. God I love me some Squanto. Let's go to the Thought Bubble. Most of the English men and women who settled in New England were uber-Protestant Puritans will believed the Protestant Church of England was still too Catholic-y with its kneeling and incense and extravagantly-hatted archbishops. The particular Puritans who, by the way did not call themselves that; other people did, who settled in new England were called Congregationalists because they thought congregations should determine leadership and worship structures, not bishops. The Pilgrims were even more extreme. They wanted to separate more or less completely from the Church of England. So first they fled to the Netherlands, but the Dutch were apparently too corrupt for them, so they rounded up investors and financed a new colony in 1620. They were supposed to live in Virginia, but in what perhaps should have been taken as an omen, they were blown wildly off course and ended up in what's now Massachusetts, founding a colony called Plymouth. While still on board their ship the Mayflower 41 of the 150 or so colonists wrote and signed an agreement called the Mayflower Compact in which they all bound themselves to follow "just and equal laws" that their chosen representatives would write-up. Since this was the first written framework for government in the US, it's kind of a big deal. But anyway the Pilgrims had the excellent fortune of landing in Massachusetts with six weeks before winter, and they have a good sense not to bring very much food with them or any farm animals. Half of them died before winter was out. The only reason they didn't all die was that local Indians led by Squanto gave them food and saved them. A year later, grateful that they had survived mainly due to the help of an alliance with the local chief Massasoit, and because the Indians had taught them how to plant corn and how to catch fish, the Pilgrims held the big feast: the first Thanksgiving. Thanks Thought Bubble! And by the way, that feast was on the fourth Thursday in November, not mid-October as is celebrated in some of these green areas we call not America. Anyway Squanto was a pretty amazing character and not only because he helped save the Pilgrims. He found that almost all of his tribe, the Patuxet had been wiped out by disease and eventually settled with the Pilgrims on the site of his former village and then died of disease because it is always ruining everything. So the Pilgrims struggled on until 1691 when their colony was subsumed by the larger and much more successful Massachusetts Bay Colony. The Massachusetts Bay colony was chartered in 1629 by London merchants who, like the founders of the Virginia Company, hoped to make money. But unlike Virginia, the board of directors relocated from England to America which meant that in Massachusetts they had a greater degree of autonomy and self-government than they did in Virginia. Social unity was also much more important in Massachusetts than it was in Virginia. The Puritans' religious mission meant that the common good was, at least at first, put above the needs or the rights of the individual. Those different ideas in the North and South about the role of government would continue... until now. Oh God. It's time for the mystery document? The rules are simple. I read the mystery document which I have not seen before. If I get it right, then I do not get shocked with the shock pen, and if I get it wrong I do. All right. "Wee must be knitt together in this worke as one man, wee must entertaine each other in brotherly Affeccion, wee must be willing to abridge our selves of our superfluities (su-per-fluities? I don't know), for the supply of others necessities, wee must uphold a familiar Commerce together in all meekenes, gentlenes, patience and liberallity, ... for wee must Consider that wee shall be as a Citty upon a Hill, the eies of all people are uppon us; soe that if wee shall deale falsely with our god in this worke wee have undertaken and soe cause him to withdrawe his present help from us, wee shall be made a story and a byword through the world." All right, first thing I noticed: the author of this document is a terrible speller or possibly wrote this before English was standardized. Also, a pretty religious individual and the community in question seems to embrace something near socialism of bridging the superfluous for others' necessities. Also it says that the community should be like a city upon a hill, like a model for everybody, and because of that metaphor, I know exactly where it comes from: the sermon A Model of Christian Charity by John Winthrop. Yes! Yes! No punishment! This is one of the most important sermons in American history. It shows us just how religious the Puritans were, but it also shows us that their religious mission wasn't really one of individualism but of collective effort. In other words, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one. But this city on a hill metaphor is the basis for one kind of American exceptionalism: the idea that we are so special and so godly that we will be a model to other nations, at least as long, according to Winthrop, as we act together. Lest you think Winthrop’s words were forgotten, they did become the centerpiece of Ronald Reagan’s 1989 farewell address. Okay so New England towns were governed democratically, but that doesn't mean that the Puritans were big on equality or that everybody was able to participate in government because no. The only people who could vote or hold office were church members, and to be a full church member you had to be a “visible saint", so really, power stayed in the hands of the church elite. The same went for equality. While it was better than in the Chesapeake Colonies or England, as equality went...eh, pretty unequal. As John Winthrop declared, "Some must be rich and some poor, some high and eminent in power and dignity, others mean and in subjection." Or as historian Eric Foner put it "Inequality was considered an expression of God's will and while some liberties applied to all inhabitants, there were separate lists of rights for freemen, women, children and servants." There was also slavery in Massachusetts. The first slaves were recorded in the colony in 1640. However, Puritans really did foster equality in one sense. They wanted everyone to be able to read the Bible. In fact, parents could be punished by the town councils for not properly instructing their children in making them literate. So when Roger Williams called for citizens to be able to practice any religion they chose, he was banished from the colonies. So was Ann Hutchinson who argued the church membership should be based on inner grace and not on outward manifestations like church attendance. Williams went on to found Rhode Island, so that worked out fine for him, but Hutchinson, who was doubly threatening to Massachusetts because she was a woman preaching unorthodox ideas, was too radical and was further banished to Westchester, New York where she and her family were killed by Indians. Finally somebody doesn't die of disease or starvation. So Americans like to think of their country as being founded by pioneers of religious freedom who were seeking liberty from the oppressive English. We've already seen that's only partly true. For one thing, Puritan ideas of equality and representation weren't particularly equitable or representational. In truth, America was also founded by indigenous people and by Spanish settlers, and the earliest English colonies weren't about religion; they were about money. We'll see this tension between American mythology and American history again next week and also every week. Thanks for watching; I’ll see you next time. Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan Muller, our script supervisor is Meredith Danko, the associate producer is Danica Johnson, the show is written by my high school history teacher, Raoul Meyer and myself, and our graphics team is Thought Bubble. If you have questions about today's video or really about anything about American history, ask them in comments; the entire Crash Course team and many history professionals are there to help you. Thanks for watching Crash Course. Please make sure you are subscribed and, as we say in my home town, don't forget to be awesome.

Origin and formation

Townships in the Eastern Townships
First colonization roads in the Townships
Survey layout for a township

Following the success of the Canada Company in spurring settlement efforts in Upper Canada, similar efforts were initiated to establish a similar company to promote settlement in the Eastern Townships of Lower Canada.

A group of investors in Montreal, headed by Francis Nathaniel Burton, proposed organizing a Lower Canada Land Company, and sent William Bowman Felton to London to promote their venture. While there, he encountered a group with similar objectives. The groups decided to combine together, and, at a meeting in February 1832, decided to proceed with creating the British American Land Company.[3][b]

It was incorporated by royal charter in March 1834,[5] and secured a private Act from the Parliament of the United Kingdom,[c] enabling it to:

  1. operate directly in any of the Provinces and colonies in British North America by virtue of the Royal charter, and appoint Commissioners and Agents for the purpose of purchasing and disposing of land therein;
  2. where any seigniorial lands are acquired by the Company (whether held à titre de fief et seigneurie, à titre de fief en arrière-fief, or à titre de cens), commute all feudal and seigniorial rights, so that such lands will be held in free and common socage (and any Crown lands acquired by the Company would have the same status); and
  3. hire indentured servants, for periods of time not to exceed seven years, for service in British North America.

Commissioners

The following Commissioners were appointed during the existence of BALC:[6][7]

  1. Peter McGill and George Moffatt (acting jointly) (1834-1835)
  2. Arthur C. Webster (1835-1837)
  3. John Fraser (1837-1844)
  4. Alexander Tilloch Galt (1844-1855)
  5. Richard William Heneker (1856-1902)[d]
  6. James Davidson (1903-)
  7. George Cate

Land holdings and later interests

The lands of the British American Land Company were chiefly concentrated between the upper Saint-François, Lake Mégantic on the Chaudière, and the International Boundary

Initial activities

In December 1833, it was announced that an agreement had been reached with Edward Smith-Stanley, Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, to acquire a total of 847,661 acres (1,324 sq mi; 3,430 km2) for a purchase price of £120,000. This consisted of 596,325 acres (932 sq mi; 2,413 km2) of unsurveyed lands in the County of Sherbrooke;[e] together with 251,336 acres (393 sq mi; 1,017 km2) in Crown reserves and surveyed Crown lands in the Counties of Sherbrooke, Shefford and Stanstead.[10]

Upon Fraser's appointment in 1835, the Company's activities began in earnest, being concentrated in three places:[11]

  1. Sherbrooke, as the Company's headquarters
  2. Victoria, in Lingwick Township,[f] as the centre of settlement activities[g]
  3. Port St. Francis, at the foot of Lake Saint Pierre,[h] as the port of entry for the district[i]
Lands (shaded in red) held by BALC in the Eastern Townships, 1839
Lands (shaded in red) held by BALC in the Eastern Townships, 1839

BALC would later acquire additional lands through public auctions and private sales,[j] bringing its total holdings up to 1,094,272 acres (1,710 sq mi; 4,428 km2).[6][17]

Colonisation efforts

Wharves and warehouses were constructed at Port St. Francis, as were grist mills, sawmills and other facilities within the territory.[11] Lands were sold subject to a 20% down payment, with the balance payable in three subsequent annual instalments, and the Company also offered to help clear the land and build a log house upon it for an extra charge.[11] During 1836, during the first year of activity, three hundred families had settled in Victoria, occupying 23,000 acres (35.9 sq mi; 93.1 km2), while 10,000 acres (15.6 sq mi; 40.5 km2) had been sold in other districts.[18]

By deliberately working to increase the English-speaking portion of the population of Lower Canada, it was denounced by the Parti patriote and was referred to in the Ninety-two Resolutions adopted by the Legislative Assembly of Lower Canada in 1834.[k][20] It was also denounced during the Lower Canada Rebellion in 1837, where a proclamation issued by Patriote leader Robert Nelson declared that all unsold Company lands "are of right the property of the State of Lower Canada."[21]

Sherbrooke, where the Saint-François and Magog Rivers meet (1839). The British American Land Company would later exploit the waterpower arising from its water rights to promote the town's industrial development.

The expenses incurred to open up the lands were high in relation to the revenues earned from their subsequent disposition.[22][23] The 1837 Rebellion discouraged immigration to Lower Canada,[6] frightening off the better class of potential immigrants,[l] and many of the current settlers were defaulting on their payments or even abandoning their lands.[18] Many of the local agents were also neglecting their duties or pilfering the company stores,[18] and the Company resisted attempts by local councils to impose property taxes on its holdings.[25] This would eventually lead to the Company experiencing financial problems in 1841, forcing it to return 511,237 acres (799 sq mi; 2,069 km2) of the St. Francis tract to the Province of Canada.[26][m]

In 1843, the Company began focus its efforts on selling land to the local French-Canadian population,[29][n] disposing it on new terms, consisting of no down payment, interest payments only for the first ten years, with the principal then being payable in four equal annual instalments.[31] In the beginning, such obligations could be settled by payment in kind.[32]

In 1858, the Company returned a further 292,729 acres (457 sq mi; 1,185 km2) to the Province, in consideration for certain sums due to the Crown.[33]

Exploitation of natural resources and manufacturing

The Company's finances would subsequently improve, and its earnings would be invested in other industrial concerns, including railroads,[o] mining[p] and Sherbrooke's textile mills,[38][q] and it would operate other industrial enterprises itself.[r] It would also get into the business of lending money, and, in 1876, the law governing interest was modified with respect to the loans made by the Company, so that it could charge an annual rate up to 8%,[41] in place of the then legal maximum of 6%.[42]

It would also begin to sell landholdings in large blocks for their value as timber. In 1872, it sold 99,833 acres (156 sq mi; 404 km2) to Cyrus Sullivan Clark of Bangor, Maine, who purchased a further 7,901 acres (12 sq mi; 32 km2) from the company in the following year.[43] These holdings were approximately half the size of the Crown timber limits that he already possessed.[43][s]

Later years

By 1910, it had sold the greater part of its holdings,[46] but continued to operate until its dissolution in 1948.[47] Most of the Company's records appear to have since been carelessly destroyed.[48]

Notable shareholders

Shareholders in the company included:[49]

Coat of arms

Coat of arms of British American Land Company[50][51]
Crest
A plough proper in front of a garb Or
Escutcheon
Argent on a saltire Azure between in chief an oak tree eradicated, in fess two bee hives and in base a ship under sail all proper, a cornucopia Or, on a chief Ermine a lion passant guardant Or between a thistle proper and a harp Or
Supporters
Dexter a woodman holding an axe sinister a reaper holding a sickle proper
Motto
Neu segnes jaceant terrae ("Do not let even poor and infertile grounds lie neglected")

Notes and references

Notes

  1. ^ who was Lower Canada's largest absentee landowner at the time[1]
  2. ^ at the same meeting, John Galt was named as the Honorary secretary of the Company,[3][4]
  3. ^ An Act for granting certain powers to the British American Land Company, 1834, c. xv (later supplemented by An Act to facilitate the proof of the Charter and Act of Incorporation of the British American Land Company, S.Prov.C. 1847, c. 107 ); later amended by 1847 c. lvi, 1871 c. clxxi, 1883 c. iv, and 1894 c. xv
  4. ^ in addition to his role as Commissioner (in which he had an activist role in investing the Company's assets in industrial development), Heneker was also Mayor of Sherbrooke for a time, Chairman of the Eastern Townships Bank and other industrial concerns, as well as having a close link for many years with Bishop's College[8]
  5. ^ known as the St. Francis Territory, situated between the upper Saint-François River and Lake Mégantic[9]
  6. ^ just outside Bury Township,[12] near the present community of Scotstown[13]
  7. ^ Victoria would shortly be abandoned, thus becoming a ghost town[14]
  8. ^ 46°16′6″N 72°37′18″W / 46.26833°N 72.62167°W / 46.26833; -72.62167; now part of Nicolet
  9. ^ as the result of the construction of better roads into the district, development of the port was later abandoned[15]
  10. ^ notably being able to employ cherry picking in selecting the most valuable land, at a price less than either the upset price or price by auction anywhere in the district[16]
  11. ^ one of the supporters of this measure was Marcus Child, the local MLA for Stanstead[19]
  12. ^ in 1841, only 400 of the 28,000 emigrants landing at Quebec would go to the Eastern Townships, and less than 1,500 acres (2.3 sq mi; 6.1 km2) were sold[24]
  13. ^ into which other colonisation efforts would be undertaken[27][28]
  14. ^ in Compton County, this would lead to the anglophone and francophone populations becoming approximately equal by the end of the 19th Century[30]
  15. ^ The St. Lawrence and Atlantic Railroad,[34] in which Galt and the Company respectively invested $30,000 and $96,000 in shares.[35] The enterprise was seen by Galt as being beneficial to developing the remainder of the Company's estates, as well as other parts of the Townships.[36]
  16. ^ the British American Exploring and Mining Association[37]
  17. ^ including the Sherbrooke Cotton Factory,[39] the first joint-stock industrial company to be incorporated in Canada,[35] in which Galt arranged for the Company's support in rescuing it from the verge of bankruptcy in 1847,[35] and the Sherbrooke Manufacturing Company[40]
  18. ^ Galt managed a large sawmill as well as a factory for making pails[35]
  19. ^ During the Long Depression of the 1870s, Clark would lose these lands as a consequence of a default on the mortgage on his properties, but would be able to repurchase 42,745 acres (67 sq mi; 173 km2) from the Eastern Townships Bank by 1879-80.[44] He would enter into partnership with John Henry Pope to form the Brompton Mills Lumber Company,[45] which would later, after several subsequent owners, be acquired by Kruger Inc.

References

  1. ^ Baskerville, Peter A. (6 February 2006). "British American Land Company". thecanadianencyclopedia.ca. Canadian Encyclopedia.
  2. ^ Browde, Anatole (2002). "Settling the Canadian Colonies: A Comparison of Two Nineteenth-Century Land Companies". Business History Review. Harvard Business School. 76 (2): 299–335. doi:10.2307/4127841. ISSN 0007-6805. JSTOR 4127841.(subscription required)
  3. ^ a b Report of the provisional committee of the British American Land Company. 1832.
  4. ^ Little 1977, p. 27, fn. 54.
  5. ^ "Royal Charter". British American Land Company. 1834.
  6. ^ a b c Channell 1896, p. 30.
  7. ^ Rudin, Ronald (1979). "Land Ownership and Urban Growth: The Experience of Two Quebec Towns, 1840-1914" (PDF). Urban History Review. 8 (2): 23–46. doi:10.7202/1019376ar., at p. 34
  8. ^ Rudin 1998.
  9. ^ Little 1989a, p. 10.
  10. ^ Information respecting the Eastern Townships of Lower Canada, in which the British American Land Company intend to commence operations for the sale and settlement of lands in the ensuing Spring. British American Land Company. December 1833.
  11. ^ a b c Skelton 1920, p. 39.
  12. ^ Rolph, Thomas (1836). "Victoria". A Brief Account, Together with Observations, Made During a Visit in the West Indies, and a Tour through the United States of America, in Parts of the Years 1832-3. Dundas: G. Heyworth Hackstaff.
  13. ^ Channell 1896, p. 33.
  14. ^ Channell 1896, p. 34.
  15. ^ Little 1977, pp. 37–38.
  16. ^ Smith 1976, p. 162.
  17. ^ Myers 1914, p. 86.
  18. ^ a b c Skelton 1920, p. 40.
  19. ^ Little 1989a, p. 13.
  20. ^ "Key terms: British American Land Company". collectionscanada.gc.ca. Library and Archives Canada.
  21. ^ Myers 1914, p. 99.
  22. ^ Channell 1896, p. 40.
  23. ^ Smith 1976, p. 164.
  24. ^ Skelton 1920, pp. 43–44.
  25. ^ Little 1977, p. 35.
  26. ^ Little 1977, p. 27.
  27. ^ Little 1977.
  28. ^ Fournier 2012.
  29. ^ Skelton 1920, p. 51.
  30. ^ Channell 1896, p. 36.
  31. ^ Skelton 1920, p. 52.
  32. ^ Skelton 1920, pp. 52–53.
  33. ^ Gagnon, Chs. A.E. (1890). "No. 6: Third Report of the Secretary of the Province of Quebec for the term of 1888-89, Registrar's Division". Sessional Papers. Vol. 2. Quebec: Queen's Printer. p. 4.
  34. ^ An Act to Incorporate the St. Lawrence and Atlantic Railroad Company, S.Prov.C. 1845, c. 25
  35. ^ a b c d Kesteman 1990.
  36. ^ Smith 1976, p. 168.
  37. ^ An Act to Incorporate the British American Exploring and Mining Association, S.Prov.C. 1864, c. 130
  38. ^ Myers 1914, pp. 86–87.
  39. ^ An Act to incorporate the Sherbrooke Cotton Factory, S.Prov.C. 1845, c. 91
  40. ^ An Act to incorporate the Sherbrooke Manufacturing Company, S.Prov.C. 1857, c. 176
  41. ^ An Act respecting Loans by "The British American Land Company", S.C. 1876, c. 56
  42. ^ An Act respecting Interest, C.S.C. 1859, c. 58, s. 9
  43. ^ a b Little 1989b, p. 107.
  44. ^ Little 1989b, pp. 107–109.
  45. ^ Waite, P.B. (1982). "Pope, John Henry". In Halpenny, Francess G (ed.). Dictionary of Canadian Biography. Vol. XI (1881–1890) (online ed.). University of Toronto Press.
  46. ^ "British American Land Company". patrimoine-culturel.gouv.qc.ca (in French). Répertoire du patrimoine culturel du Québec, Ministry of Culture and Communications.
  47. ^ "British American Land Company". The London Gazette (Supplement). No. 38260. 13 April 1948. p. 2876.
  48. ^ Little 1977, p. xi.
  49. ^ "British American Land Company: Firm details". Legacies of British Slave-ownership. University College London. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
  50. ^ "The British American Land Company: Registration of Arms and Supporters". reg.gg.ca. Canadian Heraldic Authority. 15 August 2012. p. 171.
  51. ^ Fox-Davies, Arthur Charles (1915). The Book of Public Arms. London: T.C. & E.C. Jack. p. 116.

Bibliography

History
Academic works
Biography

External links

This page was last edited on 12 March 2024, at 04:19
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.